Laser in situ keratomileusis in United States Naval aviators

Purpose To evaluate the safety and efficacy of femtosecond‐assisted wavefront‐guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) as well as higher‐order aberrometric changes in a population of active‐duty United States Naval aviators. Setting Navy Refractive Surgery Centers, San Diego, California, and Portsmouth, Virginia, USA. Design Prospective noncomparative 2‐site study. Methods In this study of femtosecond‐assisted wavefront‐guided LASIK, 3 groups were differentiated according to the refractive status: myopia, mixed astigmatism, and hyperopia. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, refraction, mesopic low‐contrast CDVA, higher‐order aberrations (HOAs), and patient satisfaction were evaluated during a 3‐month follow‐up. Results The study enrolled, treated, and included for analysis 548 eyes with myopia, 60 eyes with mixed astigmatism, and 25 eyes with hyperopia. The UDVA was 20/20 or better in 98.3% of eyes with myopia and mixed astigmatism at all postoperative visits and in 95.7% of hyperopic eyes 3 months postoperatively. The gain in CDVA was 1 or more lines in 39.2%, 41.1%, and 30.4% of myopic, mixed astigmatic and hyperopic eyes, respectively. Loss of 2 lines of CDVA after surgery occurred in 2 myopic eyes (0.4%). At 3 months, a mean change of +0.03 &mgr;m ± 0.10 (SD) and +0.05 ± 0.08 &mgr;m was observed in higher‐order root mean square and primary spherical aberration, respectively. Of the patients, 95.9% said they believed that LASIK had helped their effectiveness as Naval aviators and 99.6% would recommend the same treatment to others. Conclusion Femtosecond‐assisted wavefront‐guided LASIK was an efficacious and safe option for refractive correction in Naval aviators, enabling a quick return to flight status. Financial Disclosure Drs. Tanzer and Schallhorn are consultants to Abbott Medical Optics, Inc. No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

[1]  D. Azar,et al.  Laser eye surgery for refractive errors , 2006, The Lancet.

[2]  B. Randleman,et al.  Visual acuity and higher‐order aberrations with wavefront‐guided and wavefront‐optimized laser in situ keratomileusis , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[3]  D. Tanzer,et al.  Late traumatic flap displacement after laser in situ keratomileuisis. , 2004, Military medicine.

[4]  Soosan Jacob,et al.  Wavefront‐ and topography‐guided ablation in myopic eyes using Zyoptix , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[5]  R. Vignal,et al.  Lumière diffractée et sensibilité à l’éblouissement après PKR et LASIK guidés par front d’onde , 2008 .

[6]  T. Brunstetter,et al.  [Scattered light and glare sensitivity after wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (WFG-PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (WFG-LASIK)]. , 2008, Journal francais d'ophtalmologie.

[7]  S. Schallhorn,et al.  Laser refractive surgery in the United States Navy , 2008, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[8]  David P Piñero,et al.  Advances in technologies for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery , 2008, Expert review of medical devices.

[9]  H. D. Cavanagh,et al.  Quality of Life Changes After Myopic Wavefront-Guided Laser In Situ Keratomileusis , 2009, Eye & contact lens.

[10]  T. Simpson,et al.  Wavefront-guided LASIK for myopia: effect on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and higher order aberrations. , 2009, Journal of refractive surgery.

[11]  D J Tanzer,et al.  Ejection from an aircraft following photorefractive keratectomy: a case report. , 2000, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[12]  D. Tanzer,et al.  Visual acuity recovery after late traumatic femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis flap loss. , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[13]  R. Mackool Standard graphs for reporting refractive surgery. , 2000, Journal of refractive surgery.

[14]  S. Schallhorn,et al.  One-month outcomes of wavefront-guided LASIK for low to moderate myopia with the VISX STAR S4 laser in 32,569 eyes. , 2009, Journal of refractive surgery.

[15]  Sandor E Kaupp,et al.  Comparison of night driving performance after wavefront-guided and conventional LASIK for moderate myopia. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[16]  Mounir A. Khalifa,et al.  Iris registration in wavefront‐guided LASIK to correct mixed astigmatism , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[17]  J. Alió,et al.  Very high-frequency digital ultrasound measurement of the LASIK flap thickness profile using the IntraLase femtosecond laser and M2 and Carriazo-Pendular microkeratomes. , 2008, Journal of refractive surgery.

[18]  F K Butler,et al.  Preliminary results of photorefractive keratectomy in active-duty United States Navy personnel. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[19]  Thomas Kohnen,et al.  Wavefront-guided LASIK with the Zyoptix 3.1 system for the correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism with 1-year follow-up: clinical outcome and change in higher order aberrations. , 2004, Ophthalmology.

[20]  Yair Levy,et al.  Laser in situ keratomileusis in a combat jet aircraft pilot. , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[22]  Shady T Awwad,et al.  Wavefront-guided LASIK for myopia using the LADAR CustomCornea and the VISX CustomVue. , 2007, Journal of refractive surgery.

[23]  D. Koch,et al.  Residual higher‐order aberrations caused by clinically measured cyclotorsional misalignment or decentration during wavefront‐guided excimer laser corneal ablation , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[24]  Wavefront‐guided laser in situ keratomileusis using the WaveScan system for correction of low to moderate myopia with astigmatism: 6‐month results in 277 eyes , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[25]  G. Waring,et al.  Standard graphs for reporting refractive surgery. , 2000, Journal of refractive surgery.

[26]  Lyndon Jones,et al.  Outcomes of wavefront‐guided laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia , 2011, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[27]  M. Moshirfar,et al.  Visual outcomes after wavefront‐guided photorefractive keratectomy and wavefront‐guided laser in situ keratomileusis: Prospective comparison , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[28]  Sanjay V. Patel,et al.  Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: Metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials , 2011, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[29]  Francisco Pérez-Ocón,et al.  Optical Image Quality and Visual Performance for Patients With Keratitis , 2009, Cornea.

[30]  Hui Chen,et al.  Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized LASIK with the WaveLight platform. , 2008, Journal of refractive surgery.