The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative image guidance systems.

OBJECT Several retrospective studies have demonstrated higher accuracy rates and increased safety for navigated pedicle screw placement than for free-hand techniques; however, the accuracy differences between navigation systems has not been extensively studied. In some instances, 3D fluoroscopic navigation methods have been reported to not be more accurate than 2D navigation methods for pedicle screw placement. The authors of this study endeavored to identify if 3D fluoroscopic navigation methods resulted in a higher placement accuracy of pedicle screws. METHODS A systematic analysis was conducted to examine pedicle screw insertion accuracy based on the use of 2D, 3D, and conventional fluoroscopic image guidance systems. A PubMed and MEDLINE database search was conducted to review the published literature that focused on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative, real-time fluoroscopic image guidance in spine fusion surgeries. The pedicle screw accuracy rates were segregated according to spinal level because each spinal region has individual anatomical and morphological variations. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the pedicle screw insertion accuracy rate differences among the navigation methods. RESULTS A total of 30 studies were included in the analysis. The data were abstracted and analyzed for the following groups: 12 data sets that used conventional fluoroscopy, 8 data sets that used 2D fluoroscopic navigation, and 20 data sets that used 3D fluoroscopic navigation. These studies included 1973 patients in whom 9310 pedicle screws were inserted. With conventional fluoroscopy, 2532 of 3719 screws were inserted accurately (68.1% accuracy); with 2D fluoroscopic navigation, 1031 of 1223 screws were inserted accurately (84.3% accuracy); and with 3D fluoroscopic navigation, 4170 of 4368 screws were inserted accurately (95.5% accuracy). The accuracy rates when 3D was compared with 2D fluoroscopic navigation were also consistently higher throughout all individual spinal levels. CONCLUSIONS Three-dimensional fluoroscopic image guidance systems demonstrated a significantly higher pedicle screw placement accuracy than conventional fluoroscopy or 2D fluoroscopic image guidance methods.

[1]  Ping Zhou,et al.  Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[2]  Constantin Schizas,et al.  Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy: A Meta-analysis , 2007, Spine.

[3]  G. Yoshida,et al.  Intraoperative, full-rotation, three-dimensional image (O-arm)-based navigation system for cervical pedicle screw insertion. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[4]  Myung-Hoon Shin,et al.  Accuracy and Safety in Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spines : Comparison Study between Conventional C-Arm Fluoroscopy and Navigation Coupled with O-Arm® Guided Methods , 2012, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.

[5]  G B Jacobs,et al.  Frameless stereotactic guidance for surgery of the upper cervical spine. , 1997, Neurosurgery.

[6]  Charles Kuntz,et al.  Accuracy of Thoracic Vertebral Body Screw Placement Using Standard Fluoroscopy, Fluoroscopic Image Guidance, and Computed Tomographic Image Guidance: A Cadaver Study , 2003, Spine.

[7]  K. Schaller,et al.  Clinically relevant complications related to pedicle screw placement in thoracolumbar surgery and their management: a literature review of 35,630 pedicle screws. , 2011, Neurosurgical focus.

[8]  Tsung-Ting Tsai,et al.  Computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation of pedicle screw insertion: an in vivo feasibility study. , 2004, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[9]  Yasuo Ito,et al.  Clinical accuracy of 3D fluoroscopy-assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion. , 2008, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[10]  R. Härtl,et al.  Iso-C/3-dimensional neuronavigation versus conventional fluoroscopy for minimally invasive pedicle screw placement in lumbar fusion. , 2010, Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN.

[11]  Vincent Arlet,et al.  Complications of Pedicle Screw Fixation in Scoliosis Surgery: A Systematic Review , 2010, Spine.

[12]  Paul A Gardner,et al.  Intraoperative computed tomography image-guided navigation for posterior thoracolumbar spinal instrumentation in spinal deformity surgery. , 2010, Neurosurgical focus.

[13]  A. Dhawan,et al.  In Vivo Accuracy of Thoracic Pedicle Screws , 2001, Spine.

[14]  M. Gutberlet,et al.  Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in lumbar and sacral spine: comparison between free-hand and O-arm based navigation techniques , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[15]  Rupert Reichart,et al.  CT-navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of pedicle screws at the thoracolumbar spine: single center experience of 4,500 screws , 2013, European Spine Journal.

[16]  G. Lekovic,et al.  A comparison of two techniques in image-guided thoracic pedicle screw placement: a retrospective study of 37 patients and 277 pedicle screws. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[17]  Ulrich Hubbe,et al.  Image guided percutaneous trans-pedicular screw fixation of the thoracic spine. A clinical evaluation , 2009, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[18]  W. Castro,et al.  Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement in Lumbar Vertebrae , 1996, Spine.

[19]  A. Hartz,et al.  A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Raja Rampersaud,et al.  Clinical Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Two-Dimensional Fluoroscopy for the Percutaneous Placement of Lumbosacral Pedicle Screws , 2011, Spine.

[21]  S. Hodges,et al.  Analysis of CT-based navigation system for pedicle screw placement. , 2012, Orthopedics.

[22]  D. Resnick Prospective Comparison of Virtual Fluoroscopy to Fluoroscopy and Plain Radiographs for Placement of Lumbar Pedicle Screws , 2003, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[23]  H. Nakashima,et al.  Comparison of the Percutaneous Screw Placement Precision of Isocentric C-arm 3-dimensional Fluoroscopy-navigated Pedicle Screw Implantation and Conventional Fluoroscopy Method With Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2009, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[24]  P. Vock,et al.  Radiation dose for pedicle screw insertion. Fluoroscopic method versus computer-assisted surgery. , 1999, Spine.

[25]  K. Bulsara,et al.  Utility of Computerized Isocentric Fluoroscopy for Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgical Techniques , 2005, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[26]  S Vidyadhara,et al.  Randomized Clinical Study to Compare the Accuracy of Navigated and Non-Navigated Thoracic Pedicle Screws in Deformity Correction Surgeries , 2007, Spine.

[27]  H. Halm,et al.  Pedicle Screw Instrumentation of the Thoracic Spine in Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1997, Spine.

[28]  S. C. Açıkbaş,et al.  The effect of transpedicular screw misplacement on late spinal stability , 2003, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[29]  Jérôme Tonetti,et al.  Fluoroscopy-based navigation system in spine surgery , 2007, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[30]  R. Verma,et al.  Functional outcome of computer-assisted spinal pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies including 5,992 pedicle screws , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[31]  E. Emel,et al.  Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement for Upper and Middle Thoracic Pathologies Without Coronal Plane Spinal Deformity Using Conventional Methods , 2006, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[32]  Choll W. Kim,et al.  Use of navigation-assisted fluoroscopy to decrease radiation exposure during minimally invasive spine surgery. , 2008, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[33]  Dongsheng Zhou,et al.  Comparison of Isocentric C-Arm 3-Dimensional Navigation and Conventional Fluoroscopy for C1 Lateral Mass and C2 Pedicle Screw Placement for Atlantoaxial Instability , 2013, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[34]  M. Sanborn,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of confirmatory techniques for the placement of lumbar pedicle screws. , 2012, Neurosurgical focus.

[35]  A. Jayaswal,et al.  Outcome-Based Classification for Assessment of Thoracic Pedicular Screw Placement , 2008, Spine.

[36]  Robert F Spetzler,et al.  Intraoperative Iso-C C-Arm Navigation in Craniospinal Surgery: The First 60 Cases , 2004, Neurosurgery.

[37]  S. Esses,et al.  Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members. , 1993, Spine.

[38]  Ian Shrier,et al.  Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles. , 2007, American journal of epidemiology.

[39]  Tsung-Ting Tsai,et al.  Pedicle screw insertion: computed tomography versus fluoroscopic image guidance , 2008, International Orthopaedics.

[40]  Constantin Schizas,et al.  Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw insertion in percutaneous posterior transpedicular stabilization , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[41]  Kevin T Foley,et al.  Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion , 2003, Spine.

[42]  E. Massicotte,et al.  Clinical Accuracy of Cervicothoracic Pedicle Screw Placement: A Comparison of the “Open” Lamino-foraminotomy and Computer-assisted Techniques , 2007, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[43]  Y. R. Rampersaud,et al.  Clinical Accuracy of Fluoroscopic Computer-Assisted Pedicle Screw Fixation: A CT Analysis , 2005, Spine.

[44]  G. Yoshida,et al.  Clinical accuracy of three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement: a retrospective comparative study of conventional versus computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[45]  Y. Rampersaud,et al.  Fluoroscopic Computer-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement Through a Mature Fusion Mass: An Assessment of 24 Consecutive Cases With Independent Analysis of Computed Tomography and Clinical Data , 2007, Spine.

[46]  Nicholas Theodore,et al.  Placement of percutaneous thoracic pedicle screws using neuronavigation. , 2010, World neurosurgery.

[47]  J. Weber,et al.  Clinical and radiological results after parapedicular screw fixation of the thoracic spine. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[48]  N. Simunovic,et al.  Methodological issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies in orthopaedic research. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[49]  Vikas V Patel,et al.  Pedicle screw placement with O-arm and stealth navigation. , 2012, Orthopedics.

[50]  J. Massie,et al.  Assessment of Pedicle Screw Placement Utilizing Conventional Radiography and Computed Tomography: A Proposed Systematic Approach to Improve Accuracy of Interpretation , 2004, Spine.

[51]  Kevin T. Foley,et al.  Minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation utilizing O-arm fluoroscopy with computer-assisted navigation: Feasibility, technique, and preliminary results , 2010, Surgical neurology international.

[52]  Howard S. Smith,et al.  Evidence-Based Medicine Evidence-Based Medicine , Systematic Reviews , and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management : Part 6 . Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies , 2022 .

[53]  Three‐dimensional image‐guided placement of percutaneous pedicle screws without the use of biplanar fluoroscopy or Kirschner wires: technical note , 2010, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[54]  Rani Nasser,et al.  Clinical Assessment of Percutaneous Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Using the O-Arm Multidimensional Surgical Imaging System , 2012, Neurosurgery.

[55]  L. Nolte,et al.  Improved Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Insertion With Computer-Assisted Surgery: A Prospective Clinical Trial of 30 Patients , 1997, Spine.

[56]  S. Rajasekaran,et al.  Iso-C3D navigation assisted pedicle screw placement in deformities of the cervical and thoracic spine , 2010, Indian journal of orthopaedics.

[57]  Yasuo Ito,et al.  Upper lumbar pedicle screw insertion using three-dimensional fluoroscopy navigation: assessment of clinical accuracy. , 2010, Acta medica Okayama.

[58]  W. Tian,et al.  Comparison of the clinical accuracy of cervical (C2-C7) pedicle screw insertion assisted by fluoroscopy, computed tomography-based navigation, and intraoperative three-dimensional C-arm navigation. , 2010, Chinese medical journal.

[59]  R. Watkins,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Image-Guided Spine Surgery , 2010, The open orthopaedics journal.

[60]  F. Costa,et al.  A Prospective Multicenter Registry on the Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic, Lumbar, and Sacral Levels With the Use of the O-arm Imaging System and StealthStation Navigation , 2012, Spine.

[61]  F. Langlotz,et al.  Accuracy of Computer‐Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement: An In Vivo Computed Tomography Analysis , 1997, Spine.