Towards an Authoritative OpenStreetMap: Conflating OSM and OS OpenData National Maps' Road Network

The quality aspects of OpenStreetMap (OSM), as the global representation of crowd-sourced mapping, have always been of priomary concern to academics. While the methodologies for checking its quality against the national maps have been implemented by a number of studies, there are minimal works on how to practically improve the quality of OSM towards being an authoritative map source. This paper presents a method for conflating road attributes, namely the name and reference code, of OSM with the Open Data provided by Ordnance Survey (the British national mapping agency). The added values in the proposed methodology include the daily updates and serving of the conflated maps via open Web Services. More importantly, the OSM crowd correction is facilitated by frequently highlighting and web-serving the individual differences. There are currently over 5,800 differences in matching road names and references between the two datasets. In addition to describing the conflation methodology, the different geographic distribution patterns of the identified differences are discussed. A negative effect of the road density on the ratio of the mismatched features between the two datasets is observable, evidenced by their different geographical distribution over the map. It is shown that the best correspondence between attributes exists in the very dense areas, followed by the very low density areas, and lastly in the middle to large sized cities.

[1]  Claire Ellul,et al.  Assessing Data Completeness of VGI through an Automated Matching Procedure for Linear Data , 2012, Trans. GIS.

[2]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The credibility of volunteered geographic information , 2008 .

[3]  Amir Pourabdollah,et al.  OSM–GB: Using Open Source Geospatial Tools to Create OSM Web Services for Great Britain , 2014 .

[4]  Roberto Canavosio-Zuzelski,et al.  A Photogrammetric Approach for Assessing Positional Accuracy of OpenStreetMap© Roads , 2013, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[5]  G. Sithole,et al.  Assessing the Quality of OpenStreetMap Data in South Africa in Reference to National Mapping Standards , 2014 .

[6]  Adam C. Winstanley,et al.  Towards quality metrics for OpenStreetMap , 2010, GIS '10.

[7]  Vyron Antoniou,et al.  User generated spatial content: an analysis of the phenomenon and its challenges for mapping agencies , 2011 .

[8]  Hartmut Asche,et al.  Improvement of Spatial Data Quality Using the Data Conflation , 2011, ICCSA.

[9]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .

[10]  M. Goodchild Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography , 2007 .

[11]  Angi Voß,et al.  A Comparison of the Street Networks of Navteq and OSM in Germany , 2011, AGILE Conf..

[12]  Robert Jeansoulin,et al.  Fundamentals of Spatial Data Quality , 2006 .

[13]  M. Haklay How Good is Volunteered Geographical Information? A Comparative Study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey Datasets , 2010 .

[14]  Glen Hart,et al.  Geospatial Information Integration for Authoritative and Crowd Sourced Road Vector Data , 2012, Trans. GIS.

[15]  P.A.J. van Oort,et al.  Spatial data quality: from description to application , 2006 .

[16]  Stefan Wiemann,et al.  Conflation Services within Spatial Data Infrastructures , 2010 .

[17]  P. Mooney,et al.  Comparison of the accuracy of OpenStreetMap for Ireland with Google Maps and Bing Maps , 2010 .