Classical conditioning in rabbits using pontine nucleus stimulation as a conditioned stimulus and inferior olive stimulation as an unconditioned stimulus

Classical conditioning of skeletal muscle responses was accomplished by pairing microstimulation of the pontine nuclei as a conditioned stimulus (CS) with microstimulation of the dorsal accessory olive as an unconditioned stimulus (US). A conditioned response identical in form to the behavioral response elicited by the olivary stimulation was established when the CS was forward paired with the US, and behavioral extinction occurred with CS‐alone presentations or unpaired CS‐US presentations. Conditioned responding could not be established or maintained when the CS and US were simultaneously presented or when the US preceded the CS (i.e., backward paired). Complete lesions of the interpositus nucleus abolished both conditioned and unconditioned responses. These findings support the idea that plasticity associated with classical conditioning of skeletal muscle responses occurs in regions of the cerebellum that receive convergent CS and US input.

[1]  D. Marr A theory of cerebellar cortex , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  S. R. Coleman,et al.  Classical conditioning of the rabbit's (Oryctolagus cuniculus) nictitating membrane response under symmetrical CS-US interval shifts. , 1971, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[3]  J. Albus A Theory of Cerebellar Function , 1971 .

[4]  F. Walberg,et al.  The olivocerebellar projection in the cat studied with the method of retrograde axonal transport of horseradish peroxidase , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  J. Eccles An instruction-selection theory of learning in the cerebellar cortex , 1977, Brain Research.

[6]  F. Walberg,et al.  The olivocerebellar projection in the cat studied with the method of retrograde axonal transport of horseradish peroxidase , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  G. Hoyle Learning, using natural reinforcements, in insect preparations that permit cellular neuronal analysis. , 1980, Journal of neurobiology.

[8]  D. Alkon CELLULAR ANALYSIS OF A GASTROPOD (HERMISSENDA CRASSICORNIS) MODEL OF ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING , 1980 .

[9]  D L Alkon,et al.  Associative neural and behavioral change in Hermissenda: consequences of nervous system orientation for light and pairing specificity. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  M. Gabriel,et al.  Mechanism and Generality of Stimulus Significance Coding in a Mammalian Model System , 1982 .

[11]  Masao Ito,et al.  Climbing fibre induced depression of both mossy fibre responsiveness and glutamate sensitivity of cerebellar Purkinje cells , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  A. L. Beggs,et al.  Associative Processes in Spinal Reflexes , 1982 .

[13]  J. Houk,et al.  Somatosensory properties of the inferior olive of the cat , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Cerebellum: essential involvement in the classically conditioned eyelid response. , 1984, Science.

[15]  A. Gelperin,et al.  In vitro expression of in vivo learning by an isolated molluscan CNS , 1984, Brain Research.

[16]  M. Glickstein,et al.  Discrete lesions of the cerebellar cortex abolish the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response of the rabbit , 1984, Behavioural Brain Research.

[17]  E. Kandel,et al.  The use of simple invertebrate systems to explore psychological issues related to associative learning , 1984 .

[18]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Neuronal responses of the rabbit cerebellum during acquisition and performance of a classically conditioned nictitating membrane-eyelid response , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  J. Houk,et al.  Inferior olivary neurons in the awake cat: detection of contact and passive body displacement. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  A. L. Beggs,et al.  Classical conditioning of a flexor nerve response in spinal cats: effects of tibial nerve CS and a differential conditioning paradigm. , 1985, Behavioral neuroscience.

[21]  Joseph E. Steinmetz,et al.  Classical conditioning of the rabbit eyelid response with mossy fiber stimulation as the conditioned stimulus , 1985 .

[22]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Lesions of the inferior olivary complex cause extinction of the classically conditioned eyeblink response , 1985, Brain Research.

[23]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Effect of kainic acid lesions of the cerebellar interpositus nucleus on eyelid conditioning in the rabbit , 1985, Brain Research.

[24]  M. Kano,et al.  Long-term depression of parallel fibre synapses following stimulation of climbing fibres , 1985, Brain Research.

[25]  M. M. Patterson,et al.  Fixation of spinal reflex alterations in spinal rats by sensory nerve stimulation. , 1985, Behavioral neuroscience.

[26]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Classical conditioning using stimulation of the inferior olive as the unconditioned stimulus. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  D J Rosen,et al.  Classical conditioning of the rabbit eyelid response with a mossy-fiber stimulation CS: I. Pontine nuclei and middle cerebellar peduncle stimulation. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[28]  R. Kesner,et al.  Learning and memory : a biological view , 1986 .

[29]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  The role of the middle cerebellar peduncle in acquisition and retention of the rabbit’s classically conditioned nictitating membrane response , 1986 .

[30]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Rapid transfer of training occurs when direct mossy fiber stimulation is used as a conditioned stimulus for classical eyelid conditioning , 1986, Neuroscience Research.

[31]  W. Davis 8 – INVERTEBRATE MODEL SYSTEMS* , 1986 .

[32]  Richard F. Thompson The neurobiology of learning and memory. , 1986, Science.

[33]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Initial localization of the acoustic conditioned stimulus projection system to the cerebellum essential for classical eyelid conditioning. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Paul R. Solomon,et al.  Lesions of the middle cerebellar peduncle disrupt acquisition and retention of the rabbit's classically conditioned nictitating membrane response. , 1987, Behavioral neuroscience.

[35]  J L Lewis,et al.  Lesions of the middle cerebellar peduncle disrupt acquisition and retention of the rabbit's classically conditioned nictitating membrane response. , 1987, Behavioral neuroscience.

[36]  J. Steinmetz,et al.  Acquisition of classical conditioning without cerebellar cortex , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.