Goal-Oriented Multimedia Dialogue with Variable Initiative

A dialogue algorithm is described that executes Prolog-style rules in an attempt to achieve a goal. The algorithm selects paths in the proof in an attempt to achieve success and proves subgoals on the basis of internally available information where possible. Where “missing axioms” are discovered, the algorithm interacts with the user to solve subgoals, and it uses the received information from the user to attempt to complete the proof. A multimedia grammar codes messages sent to and received from the user into a combination of speech, text, and voice tokens. This theory is the result of a series of dialog projects implemented in our laboratory. These will be described including statistics that measure their levels of success.

[1]  Wayne H. Ward,et al.  High level knowledge sources in usable speech recognition systems , 1989, CACM.

[2]  I C Guinn Meta-Dialogue Behaviours: Improving the Efficiency of Human-Machine Dialogue -- A Computational Model of Variable Initiative and Negotiation in Collaborative Problem-Solving , 1995 .

[3]  David Traum,et al.  The Discourse System Project , 1989 .

[4]  D. Richard Hipp,et al.  Spoken Natural Language Dialog Systems: A Practical Approach , 1994 .

[5]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  User Models in Dialog Systems , 1989, Symbolic Computation.

[6]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Coordinating Text and Graphics in Explanation Generation , 1989, HLT.

[7]  Mark T. Maybury,et al.  Intelligent multimedia interfaces , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.

[8]  Rachel Reichman,et al.  Getting computers to talk like you and me , 1985 .

[9]  C. Raymond Perrault,et al.  Analyzing Intention in Utterances , 1986, Artif. Intell..

[10]  Chung Hee Hwang,et al.  The TRAINS project: a case study in building a conversational planning agent , 1994, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[11]  C. Raymond Perrault,et al.  Analyzing Intention in Dialogues , 1978 .

[12]  Alan W. Biermann,et al.  An Architecture for Voice Dialog Systems Based on Prolog-Style Theorem Proving , 1995, CL.

[13]  Judith D. Wilson,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems , 1990 .

[14]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems , 1987 .

[15]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse , 1986, CL.