Controlling form errors in 3D printed models associated to size and position on the working plane

The purpose of this paper is to assess the main effects on the geometric errors in terms of flatness, circularity and cylindricity based on the size of the printed benchmarks and according to the position of the working plane of the 3D printer. Three benchmark models of different sizes, with a parallelepiped and cylinder shape placed in five different positions on the working plane are considered. The sizes of models are chosen from the Renard series R40. Benchmark models are fabricated in ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene) using RepRap Prusa i3 3D printer. A sample of five parts for each geometric category, as defined from the R40 geometric series of numbers, is printed close to each corner of the plate, and in the plate center position. Absolute Digimatic Height Gauge 0–450 mm with an accuracy of ± 0.03 mm by Mitutoyo is used to perform all measurements: flatness on box faces, and circularity/cylindricity on cylinders. Results show that the best performances, in terms of form accuracy, are reached in the upper-left printable area while they decrease with the sample size. Being quality a critical factor for a successful industrial application of the AM processes, the results discussed in this paper can provide the AM community with additional scientific data useful to understand how to improve the quality of parts which may be obtained through new generations of 3D printer.

[1]  Debasish Dutta,et al.  A review of process planning techniques in layered manufacturing , 2000 .

[2]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  Manufacturability Analysis of Flatness Tolerances in Solid Freeform Fabrication , 2001 .

[3]  Massimo Martorelli,et al.  Surface roughness visualisation for rapid prototyping models , 2002, Comput. Aided Des..

[4]  Syed H. Masood,et al.  A Generic Part Orientation System Based on Volumetric Error in Rapid Prototyping , 2002 .

[5]  N. Venkata Reddy,et al.  Slicing procedures in layered manufacturing: a review , 2003 .

[6]  Ratnadeep Paul,et al.  Optimal part orientation in Rapid Manufacturing process for achieving geometric tolerances , 2011 .

[7]  G. Sequenzia,et al.  Experimental methodology for the tappet characterization of timing system in I.C.E. , 2013 .

[8]  Antonio Lanzotti,et al.  A Graph-based Software Tool for the CAD Modeling of Mechanical Assemblies , 2013, GRAPP/IVAPP.

[9]  Prashant K. Jain,et al.  Role of build orientation in layered manufacturing: a review , 2013, Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag..

[10]  David W. Rosen,et al.  Design for Additive Manufacturing , 2015, Additive Manufacturing Technologies.

[11]  Ratnadeep Paul,et al.  Optimization of layered manufacturing process for reducing form errors with minimal support structures , 2015 .

[12]  Antonio Lanzotti,et al.  On the Geometric Accuracy of RepRap Open-Source Three-Dimensional Printer , 2015 .

[13]  Antonio Lanzotti,et al.  Understanding Process Parameter Effects of RepRap Open-Source Three-Dimensional Printers Through a Design of Experiments Approach , 2015 .

[14]  Sam Anand,et al.  Optimum Part Build Orientation in Additive Manufacturing for Minimizing Part Errors and Support Structures , 2015 .

[15]  G. Sequenzia,et al.  Meshing angles evaluation of silent chain drive by numerical analysis and experimental test , 2016 .