Dynamics, interactions and delays of the 2019 Ridgecrest rupture sequence

[1]  T. Ulrich,et al.  Broadband Dynamic Rupture Modeling With Fractal Fault Roughness, Frictional Heterogeneity, Viscoelasticity and Topography: The 2016 Mw 6.2 Amatrice, Italy Earthquake , 2022, Geophysical Research Letters.

[2]  B. Duan,et al.  Dynamic Modeling of Interactions between Shallow Slow-Slip Events and Subduction Earthquakes , 2022, Seismological Research Letters.

[3]  J. Ampuero,et al.  Bridging time scales of faulting: From coseismic to postseismic slip of the Mw 6.0 2014 South Napa, California earthquake , 2022, Science advances.

[4]  D. Oglesby,et al.  Rupture Heterogeneity and Directivity Effects in Back‐Projection Analysis , 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[5]  B. Duan,et al.  Community‐Driven Code Comparisons for Three‐Dimensional Dynamic Modeling of Sequences of Earthquakes and Aseismic Slip , 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[6]  M. Oskin,et al.  Near-Field High-Resolution Maps of the Ridgecrest Earthquakes from Aerial Imagery , 2021, Seismological Research Letters.

[7]  L. Meng,et al.  Source Imaging With a Multi‐Array Local Back‐Projection and Its Application to the 2019 Mw 6.4 and Mw 7.1 Ridgecrest Earthquakes , 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[8]  T. Lay,et al.  The 2019 Ridgecrest, California earthquake sequence: Evolution of seismic and aseismic slip on an orthogonal fault system , 2021 .

[9]  R. Bürgmann,et al.  Diffuse Deformation and Surface Faulting Distribution from Submetric Image Correlation along the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, Ruptures , 2021, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[10]  Alice-Agnes Gabriel,et al.  3D Acoustic-Elastic Coupling with Gravity: The Dynamics of the 2018 Palu, Sulawesi Earthquake and Tsunami , 2021, SC21: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis.

[11]  E. Tinti,et al.  Constraining families of dynamic models using geological, geodetic and strong ground motion data: the Mw 6.5, October 30th, 2016, Norcia earthquake, Italy , 2021, Earth and Planetary Science Letters.

[12]  T. Ulrich,et al.  The State of Pore Fluid Pressure and 3‐D Megathrust Earthquake Dynamics , 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[13]  J. Ampuero,et al.  Deep Ductile Shear Zone Facilitates Near‐Orthogonal Strike‐Slip Faulting in a Thin Brittle Lithosphere , 2021, Geophysical Research Letters.

[14]  A. Kato,et al.  Conjugate faulting and structural complexity on the young fault system associated with the 2000 Tottori earthquake , 2021, Communications Earth & Environment.

[15]  C. Kyriakopoulos,et al.  On the Rupture Propagation of the 2019 M6.4 Searles Valley, California, Earthquake, and the Lack of Immediate Triggering of the M7.1 Ridgecrest Earthquake , 2021, Geophysical Research Letters.

[16]  R. Harris,et al.  A Geology and Geodesy Based Model of Dynamic Earthquake Rupture on the Rodgers Creek‐Hayward‐Calaveras Fault System, California , 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[17]  B. Duan,et al.  3D Finite-Element Modeling of Dynamic Rupture and Aseismic Slip over Earthquake Cycles on Geometrically Complex Faults , 2020 .

[18]  Y. Ben‐Zion,et al.  Variations of Earthquake Properties Before, During, and After the 2019 M7.1 Ridgecrest, CA, Earthquake , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[19]  J. E. McDonald,et al.  Documentation of Surface Fault Rupture and Ground-Deformation Features Produced by the 4 and 5 July 2019 Mw 6.4 and Mw 7.1 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence , 2020 .

[20]  S. Toda,et al.  Long- and Short-Term Stress Interaction of the 2019 Ridgecrest Sequence and Coulomb-Based Earthquake Forecasts , 2020, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[21]  R. Bürgmann,et al.  Rupture Process of the 2019 Ridgecrest, California Mw 6.4 Foreshock and Mw 7.1 Earthquake Constrained by Seismic and Geodetic Data , 2020 .

[22]  Jerome A. Treiman,et al.  Surface Displacement Distributions for the July 2019 Ridgecrest, California, Earthquake Ruptures , 2020 .

[23]  L. Luzi,et al.  Analysis of Near-Source Ground Motion from the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence , 2020 .

[24]  A. Ziv,et al.  Fault Rerupture during the July 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Pair from Joint Slip Inversion of InSAR, Optical Imagery, and GPS , 2020 .

[25]  Y. Fialko,et al.  Finite Slip Models of the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence Constrained by Space Geodetic Data and Aftershock Locations , 2020 .

[26]  T. Ulrich,et al.  Stress, rigidity and sediment strength control megathrust earthquake and tsunami dynamics , 2020, Nature Geoscience.

[27]  S. Wei,et al.  Highly Heterogeneous Pore Fluid Pressure Enabled Rupture of Orthogonal Faults During the 2019 Ridgecrest Mw7.0 Earthquake , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[28]  D. Garagash.  Fracture mechanics of rate-and-state faults and fluid injection induced slip , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A.

[29]  D. Shelly.  A High-Resolution Seismic Catalog for the Initial 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence: Foreshocks, Aftershocks, and Faulting Complexity , 2020 .

[30]  A. Donnellan,et al.  Using Daily Observations from Planet Labs Satellite Imagery to Separate the Surface Deformation between the 4 July Mw 6.4 Foreshock and 5 July Mw 7.1 Mainshock during the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence , 2020 .

[31]  D. Sandwell,et al.  Coseismic Displacements and Surface Fractures from Sentinel-1 InSAR: 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquakes , 2020 .

[32]  D. Melgar,et al.  Real-Time High-Rate GNSS Displacements: Performance Demonstration during the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, Earthquakes , 2020 .

[33]  J. Shaw,et al.  Detailed 3D Fault Representations for the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, Earthquake Sequence , 2020, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[34]  S. Wei,et al.  Slip Complementarity and Triggering between the Foreshock, Mainshock, and Afterslip of the 2019 Ridgecrest Rupture Sequence , 2020, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[35]  Hejun Zhu,et al.  Time‐Lapse Imaging of Coseismic Ruptures for the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquakes Using Multiazimuth Backprojection With Regional Seismic Data and a 3‐D Crustal Velocity Model , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[36]  Xin Wang,et al.  Seismotectonics and Fault Geometries of the 2019 Ridgecrest Sequence: Insight From Aftershock Moment Tensor Catalog Using 3‐D Green's Functions , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[37]  R. Harris,et al.  Dynamic Rupture Simulations of the M6.4 and M7.1 July 2019 Ridgecrest, California, Earthquakes , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[38]  F. Gallovič,et al.  Bayesian Self‐Adapting Fault Slip Inversion With Green's Functions Uncertainty and Application on the 2016 Mw7.1 Kumamoto Earthquake , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[39]  W. Ellsworth,et al.  Rapid Characterization of the July 2019 Ridgecrest, California, Earthquake Sequence From Raw Seismic Data Using Machine‐Learning Phase Picker , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[40]  J. Avouac,et al.  Cascading and pulse-like ruptures during the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquakes in the Eastern California Shear Zone , 2020, Nature Communications.

[41]  Thorne Lay,et al.  Coseismic Rupture Process of the Large 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquakes From Joint Inversion of Geodetic and Seismological Observations , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[42]  Oliver L. Stephenson,et al.  Hierarchical interlocked orthogonal faulting in the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence , 2019, Science.

[43]  D. Melgar,et al.  Complex Rupture of an Immature Fault Zone: A Simultaneous Kinematic Model of the 2019 Ridgecrest, CA Earthquakes , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[44]  M. Denolle,et al.  Relating teleseismic backprojection images to earthquake kinematics , 2019, Geophysical Journal International.

[45]  Wenbin Xu,et al.  Dynamic viability of the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake cascade on weak crustal faults , 2018, Nature Communications.

[46]  Alice-Agnes Gabriel,et al.  Off-fault plasticity in three-dimensional dynamic rupture simulations using a modal Discontinuous Galerkin method on unstructured meshes: implementation, verification and application , 2018, Geophysical Journal International.

[47]  S. Somala,et al.  A Suite of Exercises for Verifying Dynamic Earthquake Rupture Codes , 2018 .

[48]  Alice-Agnes Gabriel,et al.  Extreme Scale Multi-Physics Simulations of the Tsunamigenic 2004 Sumatra Megathrust Earthquake , 2017, SC17: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis.

[49]  A. Copley.  The strength of earthquake-generating faults , 2017, Journal of the Geological Society.

[50]  Xiaofei Chen,et al.  Effect of the time-weakening friction law during the nucleation process , 2017 .

[51]  Paul F. Gentle,et al.  Complex multifault rupture during the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake, New Zealand , 2017, Science.

[52]  František Gallovič,et al.  Fast and cheap approximation of Green function uncertainty for waveform-based earthquake source inversions , 2016 .

[53]  S. Carena,et al.  Coulomb stress evolution in a diffuse plate boundary: 1400 years of earthquakes in eastern California and western Nevada, USA , 2016 .

[54]  Michael Bader,et al.  Generating high performance matrix kernels for earthquake simulations with viscoelastic attenuation , 2016, 2016 International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation (HPCS).

[55]  Nadia Lapusta,et al.  Deeper penetration of large earthquakes on seismically quiescent faults , 2016, Science.

[56]  Alice-Agnes Gabriel,et al.  ASAGI: A Parallel Server for Adaptive Geoinformation , 2016, EASC.

[57]  Zheng‐Kang Shen,et al.  A Fault‐Based Model for Crustal Deformation, Fault Slip Rates, and Off‐Fault Strain Rate in California , 2016 .

[58]  Simon C. Stähler,et al.  Instaseis: instant global seismograms based on a broadband waveform database , 2015 .

[59]  Lion Krischer,et al.  ObsPy: a bridge for seismology into the scientific Python ecosystem , 2015 .

[60]  E. Fukuyama.  Dynamic faulting on a conjugate fault system detected by near-fault tilt measurements , 2015, Earth, Planets and Space.

[61]  Christian Pelties,et al.  On the initiation of sustained slip-weakening ruptures by localized stresses , 2015 .

[62]  J. Suppe,et al.  Fluid overpressures and strength of the sedimentary upper crust , 2014 .

[63]  Pradeep Dubey,et al.  Petascale High Order Dynamic Rupture Earthquake Simulations on Heterogeneous Supercomputers , 2014, SC14: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis.

[64]  En-Jui Lee,et al.  Full‐3‐D tomography for crustal structure in Southern California based on the scattering‐integral and the adjoint‐wavefield methods , 2014 .

[65]  Alice-Agnes Gabriel,et al.  Sustained Petascale Performance of Seismic Simulations with SeisSol on SuperMUC , 2014, ISC.

[66]  D. Fäh,et al.  Expected seismic shaking in Los Angeles reduced by San Andreas fault zone plasticity , 2014 .

[67]  Alice-Agnes Gabriel,et al.  Verification of an ADER-DG method for complex dynamic rupture problems , 2013 .

[68]  P. Mai,et al.  Source properties of dynamic rupture pulses with off‐fault plasticity , 2013 .

[69]  Y. Kaneko,et al.  Episodic fault creep events in California controlled by shallow frictional heterogeneity , 2013 .

[70]  E. Hauksson,et al.  The tectonic crustal stress field and style of faulting along the Pacific North America Plate boundary in Southern California , 2012 .

[71]  Abhijit Ghosh,et al.  Tremor asperities in the transition zone control evolution of slow earthquakes , 2012 .

[72]  P. Mai,et al.  The transition of dynamic rupture styles in elastic media under velocity-weakening friction , 2012 .

[73]  E. Dunham,et al.  Earthquake Ruptures with Strongly Rate-Weakening Friction and Off-Fault Plasticity, Part 1: Planar Faults , 2011 .

[74]  T. Hanks,et al.  Verifying a Computational Method for Predicting Extreme Ground Motion , 2011 .

[75]  M. Cocco,et al.  Fault lubrication during earthquakes , 2011, Nature.

[76]  Andrea Bizzarri,et al.  How to Promote Earthquake Ruptures: Different Nucleation Strategies in a Dynamic Model with Slip-Weakening Friction , 2010 .

[77]  N. Lapusta,et al.  Three‐dimensional boundary integral modeling of spontaneous earthquake sequences and aseismic slip , 2009 .

[78]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Broadband simulations for Mw 7.8 southern San Andreas earthquakes: Ground motion sensitivity to rupture speed , 2008 .

[79]  Shuo Ma.  A physical model for widespread near‐surface and fault zone damage induced by earthquakes , 2008 .

[80]  J. Ampuero,et al.  Spectral element modeling of spontaneous earthquake rupture on rate and state faults: Effect of velocity‐strengthening friction at shallow depths , 2008 .

[81]  A. Michael,et al.  Damped regional‐scale stress inversions: Methodology and examples for southern California and the Coalinga aftershock sequence , 2006 .

[82]  M. Dumbser,et al.  An arbitrary high-order discontinuous Galerkin method for elastic waves on unstructured meshes — II. The three-dimensional isotropic case , 2006 .

[83]  J. Ampuero,et al.  Earthquake nucleation on (aging) rate and state faults , 2005 .

[84]  Elisa Tinti,et al.  A Kinematic Source Time Function Compatible With Earthquake Dynamics: Relations Between Kinematic and Dynamic Parameters , 2004 .

[85]  D. J. Andrews,et al.  Rupture models with dynamically determined breakdown displacement , 2004 .

[86]  Raul Madariaga,et al.  On the Self-Healing Fracture Mode , 2003 .

[87]  D. Andrews.  Rupture dynamics with energy loss outside the slip zone , 2003 .

[88]  R. Madariaga,et al.  The 1999 İzmit, Turkey, Earthquake: Nonplanar Fault Structure, Dynamic Rupture Process, and Strong Ground Motion , 2001 .

[89]  Thomas A. Hennig,et al.  The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission , 2001, Digital Earth Moving.

[90]  Christopher R. Bradley,et al.  Memory-Efficient Simulation of Anelastic Wave Propagation , 2001 .

[91]  Barbara Romanowicz,et al.  The three‐dimensional shear velocity structure of the mantle from the inversion of body, surface and higher‐mode waveforms , 2000 .

[92]  F. Cotton,et al.  Dynamic stress variations due to shear faults in a plane-layered medium , 1997 .

[93]  Barbara Romanowicz,et al.  Toward real-time estimation of regional moment tensors , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[94]  H. Kanamori,et al.  Preliminary Report on the 1995 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence in Eastern California , 1995 .

[95]  E. Hauksson,et al.  The 1992 Landers Earthquake Sequence: Seismological observations , 1993 .

[96]  Lisa Wald,et al.  Southern California earthquake data center , 1992 .

[97]  K. W. Neale,et al.  Dynamic fracture mechanics , 1991 .

[98]  B. Kennett,et al.  Traveltimes for global earthquake location and phase identification , 1991 .

[99]  D. Lockner,et al.  Fault stability inferred from granite sliding experiments at hydrothermal conditions , 1991 .

[100]  T. Heaton.  Evidence for and implications of self-healing pulses of slip in earthquake rupture , 1990 .

[101]  A. Ruina.  Slip instability and state variable friction laws , 1983 .

[102]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Preliminary reference earth model , 1981 .

[103]  A. Lachenbruch,et al.  Heat flow and energetic of the San Andreas fault zone , 1980 .

[104]  J. Dieterich.  Modeling of rock friction: 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations , 1979 .

[105]  A. Gabriel,et al.  A discontinuous Galerkin method for sequences of earthquakes and aseismic slip on multiple faults using unstructured curvilinear grids , 2022 .

[106]  C. Braitenberg,et al.  The Chile-2015 (Illapel) Earthquake and Tsunami , 2017 .

[107]  Malcolm Sambridge,et al.  A Parallel Tempering algorithm for probabilistic sampling and multimodal optimization , 2014 .

[108]  Sebastian Rettenberger,et al.  A Parallel Server for Adaptive Geoinformation , 2013 .

[109]  E. M. Anderson.  The dynamics of faulting , 1905, Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society.