Detail-Preserving PET Reconstruction with Sparse Image Representation and Anatomical Priors

Positron emission tomography (PET) reconstruction is an ill-posed inverse problem which typically involves fitting a high-dimensional forward model of the imaging process to noisy, and sometimes undersampled photon emission data. To improve the image quality, prior information derived from anatomical images of the same subject has been previously used in the penalised maximum likelihood (PML) method to regularise the model complexity and selectively smooth the image on a voxel basis in PET reconstruction. In this work, we propose a novel perspective of incorporating the prior information by exploring the sparse property of natural images. Instead of a regular voxel grid, the sparse image representation jointly determined by the prior image and the PET data is used in reconstruction to leverage between the image details and smoothness, and this prior is integrated into the PET forward model and has a closed-form expectation maximisation (EM) solution. Simulations show that the proposed approach achieves improved bias versus variance trade-off and higher contrast recovery than the current state-of-the-art methods, and preserves the image details better. Application to clinical PET data shows promising results.

[1]  Jinyi Qi,et al.  Iterative reconstruction techniques in emission computed tomography , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Anthonin Reilhac,et al.  Evaluation of Three MRI-Based Anatomical Priors for Quantitative PET Brain Imaging , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Incorporation of Anatomical MR Data for Improved Dunctional Imaging with PET , 1991, IPMI.

[4]  Shih-Fu Chang,et al.  Segmentation using superpixels: A bipartite graph partitioning approach , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[5]  Guobao Wang,et al.  PET Image Reconstruction Using Kernel Method , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[7]  Pascal Fua,et al.  SLIC Superpixels Compared to State-of-the-Art Superpixel Methods , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A non-local algorithm for image denoising , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[9]  Huafeng Liu,et al.  Dynamic Dual-Tracer PET Reconstruction , 2009, IPMI.

[10]  R. Leahy,et al.  Magnetic resonance-guided positron emission tomography image reconstruction. , 2013, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[11]  Ninon Burgos,et al.  Attenuation Correction Synthesis for Hybrid PET-MR Scanners: Application to Brain Studies , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  J. Bowsher,et al.  Utilizing MRI information to estimate F18-FDG distributions in rat flank tumors , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[13]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Anatomical-based FDG-PET reconstruction for the detection of hypo-metabolic regions in epilepsy , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Michael Brady,et al.  Edge- and Detail-Preserving Sparse Image Representations for Deformable Registration of Chest MRI and CT Volumes , 2013, IPMI.

[16]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Direct Estimation of Kinetic Parametric Images for Dynamic PET , 2013, Theranostics.

[17]  S. Gunn,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography Compartmental Models , 2001, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[18]  P. Green Bayesian reconstructions from emission tomography data using a modified EM algorithm. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[19]  Soo-Jin Lee,et al.  Incorporating Anatomical Side Information Into PET Reconstruction Using Nonlocal Regularization , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[20]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Learning a classification model for segmentation , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[21]  Hanan Samet,et al.  A general approach to connected-component labeling for arbitrary image representations , 1992, JACM.

[22]  Pengcheng Shi,et al.  Tracer Kinetics Guided Dynamic PET Reconstruction , 2007, IPMI.

[23]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Edge-Preserving PET Image Reconstruction Using Trust Optimization Transfer , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.