The predictive state: Science, territory and the future of the Indian climate

Acts of scientific calculation have long been considered central to the formation of the modern nation state, yet the transnational spaces of knowledge generation and political action associated with climate change seem to challenge territorial modes of political order. This article explores the changing geographies of climate prediction through a study of the ways in which climate change is rendered knowable at the national scale in India. The recent controversy surrounding an erroneous prediction of melting Himalayan glaciers by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change provides a window onto the complex and, at times, antagonistic relationship between the Panel and Indian political and scientific communities. The Indian reaction to the error, made public in 2009, drew upon a national history of contestation around climate change science and corresponded with the establishment of a scientific assessment network, the Indian Network for Climate Change Assessment, which has given the state a new platform on which to bring together knowledge about the future climate. I argue that the Indian Network for Climate Change Assessment is indicative of the growing use of regional climate models within longer traditions of national territorial knowledge-making, allowing a rescaling of climate change according to local norms and practices of linking scientific knowledge to political action. I illustrate the complex co-production of the epistemic and the normative in climate politics, but also seek to show how co-productionist understandings of science and politics can function as strategic resources in the ongoing negotiation of social order. In this case, scientific rationalities and modes of environmental governance contribute to the contested epistemic construction of territory and the evolving spatiality of the modern nation state under a changing climate.

[1]  People's Science Movements and Science Wars? , 2008 .

[2]  H. S. Ray,et al.  Methane budget from paddy fields in India , 1997 .

[3]  S. Elden Land, terrain, territory , 2010 .

[4]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[5]  K. Richards,et al.  Environmental Science and Policy , 2015 .

[6]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Earthly politics : local and global in environmental governance , 2004 .

[7]  S. Shapin Placing the View from Nowhere: Historical and Sociological Problems in the Location of Science , 1998 .

[8]  J. Crampton Cartographic calculations of territory , 2011 .

[9]  K. Sivaramakrishnan,et al.  Modern Forests: Statemaking and Environmental Change in Colonial Eastern India , 1999 .

[10]  Jeremy Black Mapping an Empire: The Geographical Construction of British India, 1765–1843: Edney, Matthew, H.: Chicago: University of Chicago Press 479 pp., Publication Date: May 1998 , 1999 .

[11]  P. Bagla Climate change. No sign yet of Himalayan meltdown, Indian report finds. , 2009, Science.

[12]  S. Shackley,et al.  Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority , 1996 .

[13]  Timothy Mitchell,et al.  Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity , 2002 .

[14]  P. Walsh The Power of Maps. , 1998 .

[15]  S. Whatmore Mapping knowledge controversies: science, democracy and the redistribution of expertise , 2009 .

[16]  Bruce Braun Producing vertical territory: geology and governmentality in late Victorian Canada , 2000 .

[17]  P. K. Basu,et al.  River of Love in an Age of Pollution: The Yamuna River of Northern India , 2007 .

[18]  S. Elden Governmentality, Calculation, Territory , 2007 .

[19]  J. Zhang,et al.  Cosmopolitan communities of climate risk:conceptual and empirical suggestions for a new research agenda , 2013 .

[20]  Ann Oakley,et al.  Trust in Numbers , 1995 .

[21]  H. Stevenson India and international norms of climate governance: a constructivist analysis of normative congruence building , 2011, Review of International Studies.

[22]  N. Thrift Environment and Planning D: Society and Space , 1995 .

[23]  D. Raghunandan India’s official position: a critical view based on science , 2011 .

[24]  Angela Oels,et al.  Rendering climate change governable: From biopower to advanced liberal government? , 2005 .

[25]  T. Gieryn Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional , 1983 .

[26]  Suraje Dessai,et al.  Negotiating future climates for public policy: a critical assessment of the development of climate scenarios for the UK , 2008 .

[27]  S. Narain,et al.  Global warming in an unequal world : a case of environmental colonialism , 1991 .

[28]  Matthew Henry Edney Mapping an Empire: The Geographical Construction of British India, 1765-1843 , 1997 .

[29]  S Jasanoff The Bhopal disaster and the right to know. , 1988, Social science & medicine.

[30]  David Demeritt,et al.  The Construction of Global Warming and the Politics of Science , 2001 .

[31]  M. Kandlikar,et al.  Who participates in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and why: A quantitative assessment of the national representation of authors in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2011 .

[32]  E. Swyngedouw Apocalypse Forever? , 2010 .

[33]  Glyn Williams Producing India: From colonial economy to national space , 2005 .

[34]  P. Jones,et al.  UK Climate Projections Briefing Report , 2010 .

[35]  M. Lahsen Trust Through Participation? Problems of Knowledge in Climate Decision Making , 2016 .

[36]  Aradhana Sharma Introduction: Rethinking Theories of the State in an Age of Globalization , 2006 .

[37]  T. Golan Predicting the Weather: Victorians and the Science of Meteorology , 2006 .

[38]  Hani Awad Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity by Timothy Mitchell , 2012 .

[39]  E. Carlson :Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States , 2008 .

[40]  Navroz K. Dubash,et al.  The politics of climate change in India: narratives of equity and cobenefits , 2013 .

[41]  Mike Hulme,et al.  Problems with making and governing global kinds of knowledge. , 2010 .

[42]  S. Jasanoff States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order , 2004 .

[43]  B. Hutter,et al.  Restoring reason: causal narratives and political culture , 2005 .

[44]  Shiv Visvanathan,et al.  Knowledge, justice and democracy. , 2005 .

[45]  Paul Humphreys,et al.  The philosophical novelty of computer simulation methods , 2009, Synthese.

[46]  Richard O. Mason,et al.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[47]  D. Jacob,et al.  Adaptation to changing water resources in the Ganges basin, northern India , 2011 .

[48]  Neha Pahuja,et al.  Climate Policy in India: What Shapes International, National and State Policy? , 2012, AMBIO.

[49]  S. Rayner,et al.  The Hartwell Paper: a new direction for climate policy after the crash of 2009 , 2010 .

[50]  E. Hawkins,et al.  The Potential to Narrow Uncertainty in Regional Climate Predictions , 2009 .

[51]  M. Svoboda Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity , 2011 .

[52]  D. Dennis,et al.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 1998 .

[53]  Eva Lövbrand,et al.  Making climate change governable: accounting for carbon as sinks, credits and personal budgets , 2011 .

[54]  John Pickles,et al.  A History of Spaces: Cartographic Reason, Mapping and the Geo-Coded World , 2003 .

[55]  S. Beck Between Tribalism and Trust: The IPCC Under the "Public Microscope" , 2012 .

[56]  V. Raina,et al.  Himalayan glaciers: a state-of-art review of glacial studies, glacial retreat and climate change. , 2009 .

[57]  S. Jasanoff A New Climate for Society , 2010 .

[58]  James C. Scott,et al.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 1999 .

[59]  A. Mackay Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2008 .

[60]  J. L. Heilbron,et al.  Leviathan and the air-pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life , 1989, Medical History.

[61]  Thongchai Winichakul Mapping: A New Technology of Space; Geo‐Body, from Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo‐Body of a Nation , 1997, Journal of Asian Studies.

[62]  M. Hulme Cosmopolitan Climates , 2010 .

[63]  J. Agnew The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory , 1994 .

[64]  Patrick Armstrong,et al.  Putting Science in its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge , 2005 .

[65]  M. Weber From Max Weber: Essays in sociology , 1946 .

[66]  M. Whitehead,et al.  The nature of the state: excavating the political ecologies of the modern state , 2007 .

[67]  F. Biermann Big science, small impacts—in the South? The influence of global environmental assessments on expert communities in India , 2001 .

[68]  This Fissured Land: An Ecological History of India , 1993 .

[69]  Eva Lövbrand,et al.  Co-producing European climate science and policy: a cautionary note on the making of useful knowledge , 2011 .

[70]  P. Pattberg,et al.  The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis , 2009, Global Environmental Politics.

[71]  N. Dubash Handbook of Climate Change and India: Development, Politics, and Governance , 2012 .

[72]  R. Guha,et al.  This Fissured Land: An Ecological History of India. , 1993 .

[73]  M. Hulme,et al.  Model migrations: mobility and boundary crossings in regional climate prediction , 2012 .

[74]  J. O’Reilly Tectonic History and Gondwanan Geopolitics in the Larsemann Hills, Antarctica , 2011 .

[75]  Lotta Dellve,et al.  Charmaz, Kathy (2006). Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: SAGE , 2006 .

[76]  Andrew P. Kythreotis,et al.  Progress in global climate change politics? Reasserting national state territoriality in a ‘post-political’ world , 2012 .

[77]  J. Black Mapping an Empire: The Geographical Construction of British India, 17651843 , 1999 .

[78]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Heaven and earth : the politics of environmental images , 2004 .

[79]  M. Kandlikar,et al.  Climate change research and analysis in India: an integrated assessment of a South–North divide , 1999 .

[80]  Naomi Oreskes,et al.  The rapid disintegration of projections: The West Antarctic Ice Sheet and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2012, Social studies of science.

[81]  R. Guha,et al.  This Fissured Land , 1992 .

[82]  Elana Tovah Wilson Rowe,et al.  International Science, Domestic Politics: Russian Reception of International Climate-Change Assessments , 2012 .

[83]  D. Weetman Green Politics , 1992 .

[84]  Y. Ezrahi,et al.  The descent of Icarus , 1990 .

[85]  C. Flachsland,et al.  The architecture of the global climate regime: a top-down perspective , 2010 .

[86]  E. Brink,et al.  Constructing grounded theory : A practical guide through qualitative analysis , 2006 .

[87]  F. Kruger Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction, and Opportunity , 2012 .

[88]  E. Laclau Imagined Communities , 2019, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Music and Culture.

[89]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective , 2007 .

[90]  S. Herbert,et al.  Progress in Human Geography , 2001 .

[91]  Brianne Yantz Reframing Rights : Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age , 2013 .

[92]  Sumathi Ramaswamy,et al.  Mapping an Empire: The Geographical Construction of British India . By Matthew H. Edney. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997. xxi, 458 pp. $35.00 (cloth). , 1998, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[93]  Y. Ezrahi,et al.  The descent of Icarus : science and the transformation of contemporary democracy , 1990 .