Image compressive-sensing recovery using structured laplacian sparsity in DCT domain and multi-hypothesis prediction

In compressive sensing (CS), the seeking of a fair domain is of essentially significance to achieve a high enough degree of signal sparsity. Most methods in the literature, however, use a fixed transform domain or prior information that cannot exhibit enough sparsity for various images. Superiorly, we propose an algorithm to explore the structured Laplacian sparsity of DCT coefficients, which can adapt to the non-stationarity of natural images. Better sparsity is achieved by utilizing the nonlocal similarity of natural images and constructing structured image patch groups. Meanwhile, multiple hypotheses for each pixel could be obtained owing to the overlapping of the structured groups and similar patches. Additionally, for solving the optimization problem formulated from the techniques above, we design an efficient iterative method based on split Bregman iteration (SBI) algorithm. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm outperforms the other state-of-the-art methods in both objective and subjective recovery quality.

[1]  James E. Fowler,et al.  Block Compressed Sensing of Images Using Directional Transforms , 2010, 2010 Data Compression Conference.

[2]  Wen Gao,et al.  Image Compressive Sensing Recovery via Collaborative Sparsity , 2012, IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems.

[3]  Jian-Feng Cai,et al.  Split Bregman Methods and Frame Based Image Restoration , 2009, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[4]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[5]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Image Deblurring and Super-Resolution by Adaptive Sparse Domain Selection and Adaptive Regularization , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  Wen Gao,et al.  Compressed Sensing Recovery via Collaborative Sparsity , 2012, 2012 Data Compression Conference.

[7]  Wen Gao,et al.  Compression Artifact Reduction by Overlapped-Block Transform Coefficient Estimation With Block Similarity , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Image compressive sensing recovery using adaptively learned sparsifying basis via L0 minimization , 2014, Signal Process..

[9]  David L Donoho,et al.  Compressed sensing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[10]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A non-local algorithm for image denoising , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[11]  Tom Goldstein,et al.  The Split Bregman Method for L1-Regularized Problems , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[12]  Wen Gao,et al.  Structural Group Sparse Representation for Image Compressive Sensing Recovery , 2013, 2013 Data Compression Conference.

[13]  Chen Chen,et al.  Compressed-sensing recovery of images and video using multihypothesis predictions , 2011, 2011 Conference Record of the Forty Fifth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR).

[14]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Improved total variation based image compressive sensing recovery by nonlocal regularization , 2012, 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS2013).

[15]  Ali Bilgin,et al.  Compressed sensing using a Gaussian Scale Mixtures model in wavelet domain , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[16]  Laurent D. Cohen,et al.  Non-local Regularization of Inverse Problems , 2008, ECCV.

[17]  Lawrence Carin,et al.  Exploiting Structure in Wavelet-Based Bayesian Compressive Sensing , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[18]  Joseph W. Goodman,et al.  A mathematical analysis of the DCT coefficient distributions for images , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[19]  Gitta Kutyniok,et al.  1 . 2 Sparsity : A Reasonable Assumption ? , 2012 .

[20]  Yin Zhang,et al.  User’s Guide for TVAL3: TV Minimization by Augmented Lagrangian and Alternating Direction Algorithms , 2010 .