Importance of detailed chemical kinetics on combustion and soot modelling of ventilated and under-ventilated fires in compartment

A novel in-house computation code based on large eddy simulations (LES) incorporating fully coupled subgrid-scale (SGS) turbulence, combustion, soot and radiation models for turbulent reacting flows in compartment fires has been developed. It uniquely embraces the detailed reaction mechanisms for the chemical processes involved during combustion, which provides a comprehensive description of the fuel oxidation processes. Furthermore, it gives a more complete representation of the generation of intermediate chemical by-products including toxic gases such as carbon monoxide and irritant gases such as soot. Since the modelling of hydrocarbons by-products are enabled when considering the full chemical profile, the formation of soot particles is correlated to the concentration of main soot incipient acetylene, which provides an appropriate representation of nucleation, surface growth processes. The LES code has been validated with experimental fire tests results for both ventilated and under-ventilated fires in compartment for confirmation of its robustness. The importance of incorporating the detailed reaction mechanisms in compartment fire simulations has been confirmed by comparing with experiments. For under-ventilated fires in compartment, the chemical kinetics become increasingly important since the combustion efficiency drops significantly involving generation of intermediate chemical species. It is discovered that species concentrations especially CO2 and CO are more accurately predicted by the detailed scheme comparing to the multi-step scheme, since the formation of hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides are considered. In general, the simulation incorporating detailed kinetics showed an averaged improvement of 9.2% and 81.7% in the prediction of CO2/CO ratio and volume fraction of soot respectively. This also improves the replication of the flame structure as the fire is chemically-driven within the combustion zone.

[1]  N. C. Markatos,et al.  Mathematical modelling of buoyancy-induced smoke flow in enclosures , 1982 .

[2]  Andrew W. Cook,et al.  Subgrid-scale modeling for turbulent reacting flows , 1998 .

[3]  Christophe Duwig,et al.  Large Eddy Simulation of turbulent combustion in a stagnation point reverse flow combustor using detailed chemistry , 2014 .

[4]  T. A. Zang,et al.  Toward the large-eddy simulation of compressible turbulent flows , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  A. Coppalle,et al.  Under-ventilated Compartment Fires: A Full-Scale Test with Wood Pallets , 2011 .

[6]  Jennifer X. Wen,et al.  The effect of microscopic and global radiative heat exchange on the field predictions of compartment fires , 2001 .

[7]  W. S. Hsu,et al.  Investigating the effect of computational grid sizes on the predicted characteristics of thermal radiation for a fire , 2009 .

[8]  William M Pitts.  Carbon monoxide production in compartment fires: : reduced-scale enclosure test facility , 1994 .

[9]  F. Ducros,et al.  Subgrid scale variance and dissipation of a scalar field in large eddy simulations , 2001 .

[10]  James J. Riley,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF CLOSURE MODELS FOR NONPREMIXED TURBULENT REACTING FLOWS , 1994 .

[11]  J. C. Ho,et al.  Comparison of different combustion models in enclosure fire simulation , 2001 .

[12]  Siuming Lo,et al.  Flickering Behavior of Turbulent Buoyant Fires Using Large-Eddy Simulation , 2007 .

[13]  K. M. Leung,et al.  A simplified reaction mechanism for soot formation in nonpremixed flames , 1991 .

[14]  Guan Heng Yeoh,et al.  Numerical Simulation of a Ceiling Jet Fire in a Large Compartment , 2013 .

[15]  Habib N. Najm,et al.  Regular Article: A Semi-implicit Numerical Scheme for Reacting Flow , 1999 .

[16]  Siuming Lo,et al.  Development of Wall-Adapting Local Eddy Viscosity Model for Study of Fire Dynamics in a Large Compartment , 2013 .

[17]  H. Bockhorn.  A Short Introduction to the Problem — Structure of the Following Parts , 1994 .

[18]  Wan Ki Chow,et al.  A theoretical model to predict plume rise in shaft generated by growing compartment fire , 2011 .

[19]  Anthony P. Hamins,et al.  Measurements of Heat and Combustion Products in Reduced-Scale Ventilation-Limited Compartment Fires , 2014 .

[20]  Nicola Bianco,et al.  Adiabatic surface temperature as thermal/structural parameter in fire modeling: Thermal analysis for different wall conductivities , 2014 .

[21]  Konstantinos Gkagkas,et al.  Transported PDF modelling with detailed chemistry of pre- and auto-ignition in CH4/air mixtures , 2007 .

[22]  J. B. Moss,et al.  Predictions of soot and thermal radiation properties in confined turbulent jet diffusion flames , 1999 .

[23]  R. Huo,et al.  Comparison of FDS predictions by different combustion models with measured data for enclosure fires , 2010 .

[24]  M. Thomson,et al.  Application of an enhanced PAH growth model to soot formation in a laminar coflow ethylene/air diffusion flame , 2011 .

[25]  A. Leonard.  Energy Cascade in Large-Eddy Simulations of Turbulent Fluid Flows , 1975 .

[26]  Akira Yoshizawa,et al.  A Statistically-Derived Subgrid-Scale Kinetic Energy Model for the Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flows , 1985 .

[27]  S. S. Li,et al.  Large eddy simulation of post-flashover room fires based on the Vreman subgrid-scale model , 2015 .

[28]  R. W. Bilger,et al.  The prediction of turbulent diffusion flame fields and nitric oxide formation , 1977 .

[29]  Philip J. Smith,et al.  Predicting Radiative Transfer in Rectangular Enclosures Using the Discrete Ordinates Method , 1988 .

[30]  Craig L. Beyler,et al.  The role of temperature on carbon monoxide production in compartment fires , 1995 .

[31]  J. B. Moss,et al.  Flowfield modelling of soot formation at elevated pressure , 1989 .

[32]  Tracie Barber,et al.  LES and Multi-Step Chemical Reaction in Compartment Fires , 2015 .

[33]  Guan Heng Yeoh,et al.  NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF AN ENCLOSURE FIRE IN A LARGE TEST HALL , 2013 .

[34]  F. Nicoud,et al.  Subgrid-Scale Stress Modelling Based on the Square of the Velocity Gradient Tensor , 1999 .

[35]  W. Jones.  Models for turbulent flows with variable density and combustion , 1979 .

[36]  D. Price,et al.  Advances in fire retardant materials , 2008 .

[37]  Robert W. Bilger,et al.  Reaction rates in diffusion flames , 1977 .

[38]  Guan Heng Yeoh,et al.  Fire scene investigation of an arson fire incident using computational fluid dynamics based fire simulation , 2014 .

[39]  Vinod M. Janardhanan,et al.  Predicting the temperature and reactant concentration profiles of reacting flow in the partial oxidation of hot coke oven gas using detailed chemistry and a one-dimensional flow model , 2015 .

[40]  Guan Heng Yeoh,et al.  On modelling combustion, radiation and soot processes in compartment fires , 2003 .

[41]  F. Tap,et al.  Impact of detailed chemistry and transport models on turbulent combustion simulations , 2004 .

[42]  P. Moin,et al.  Application of a Fractional-Step Method to Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations , 1984 .

[43]  Tiefeng Wang,et al.  Simulation of partial oxidation of natural gas with detailed chemistry: Influence of addition of H2, C2H6 and C3H8 , 2010 .

[44]  Jennifer X. Wen,et al.  CFD modelling of confined jet fires under ventilation-controlled conditions , 2000 .

[45]  F. C. Lockwood,et al.  The prediction of the fluctuations in the properties of free, round-jet, turbulent, diffusion flames , 1975 .

[46]  C. Westbrook,et al.  Simplified Reaction Mechanisms for the Oxidation of Hydrocarbon Fuels in Flames , 1981 .

[47]  Jose L. Torero,et al.  SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering , 2016 .

[48]  Robert J. Santoro,et al.  The oxidation of soot and carbon monoxide in hydrocarbon diffusion flames , 1994 .