“I know you can hear me”: Neural correlates of feigned hearing loss

In the assessment of human hearing, it is often important to determine whether hearing loss is organic or nonorganic in nature. Nonorganic, or functional, hearing loss is often associated with deceptive intention on the part of the listener. Over the past decade, functional neuroimaging has been used to study the neural correlates of deception, and studies have consistently highlighted the contribution of the prefrontal cortex in such behaviors. Can patterns of brain activity be similarly used to detect when an individual is feigning a hearing loss? To answer this question, 15 adult participants were requested to respond to pure tones and simple words correctly, incorrectly, randomly, or with the intent to feign a hearing loss. As predicted, more activity was observed in the prefrontal cortices (as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging), and delayed behavioral reaction times were noted, when the participants feigned a hearing loss or responded randomly versus when they responded correctly or incorrectly. The results suggest that cortical imaging techniques could play a role in identifying individuals who are feigning hearing loss. Hum Brain Mapp, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc

[1]  Matthias Gamer,et al.  fMRI-activation patterns in the detection of concealed information rely on memory-related effects. , 2012, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[2]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analyses. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  Xinghua Lu,et al.  Functional MRI Detection of Deception After Committing a Mock Sabotage Crime * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[4]  S. Spence,et al.  Looking for truth and finding lies: The prospects for a nascent neuroimaging of deception , 2008, Neurocase.

[5]  John-Dylan Haynes,et al.  Detecting concealed information using brain-imaging technology , 2008, Neurocase.

[6]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Assignment of functional activations to probabilistic cytoarchitectonic areas revisited , 2007, NeuroImage.

[7]  Masatoshi Itoh,et al.  Deceiving Others: Distinct Neural Responses of the Prefrontal Cortex and Amygdala in Simple Fabrication and Deception with Social Interactions , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Testing anatomically specified hypotheses in functional imaging using cytoarchitectonic maps , 2006, NeuroImage.

[9]  Julie A Fiez,et al.  Cerebellar damage produces selective deficits in verbal working memory. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  R. Gur,et al.  Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event‐related fMRI , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Jia-Hong Gao,et al.  Neural correlates of feigned memory impairment , 2005, NeuroImage.

[12]  S. H. A. Chen,et al.  Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation impairs verbal working memory , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[13]  J. Lorberbaum,et al.  A pilot study of functional magnetic resonance imaging brain correlates of deception in healthy young men. , 2004, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[14]  Rajesh Kumar,et al.  A method for removal of global effects from fMRI time series , 2004, NeuroImage.

[15]  Bradley McPherson,et al.  Occupational hearing loss: screening with distortion-product otoacoustic emissions , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[16]  C. Lynch,et al.  Non-organic hearing loss redefined: understanding, categorizing and managing non-organic behaviour , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[17]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Neural correlates of different types of deception: an fMRI investigation. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  I. Keogh,et al.  The use of cortical evoked response audiometry in the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss. , 2003, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[19]  Steve C R Williams,et al.  Acoustic noise and functional magnetic resonance imaging: Current strategies and future prospects , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  Jean-Francois Mangin,et al.  What is the best similarity measure for motion correction in fMRI time series? , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  K Ugurbil,et al.  Detunable transverse electromagnetic (TEM) volume coil for high‐field NMR , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Chetwyn C. H. Chan,et al.  Lie detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[23]  R. C. Gur,et al.  Brain Activity during Simulated Deception: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[24]  A. Vrij Detecting Lies and Deceit: The Psychology of Lying and the Implications for Professional Practice , 2000 .

[25]  W. Wilson,et al.  Use of the NAL-AB wordlists as a South African English speech discrimination test. , 1998, The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings.

[26]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  R. Peters,et al.  Auditory reaction times for functional and nonfunctional hearing loss. , 1977, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research.

[28]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  S. Gelfand Acoustic reflex threshold tenth percentiles and functional hearing impairment. , 1994, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[30]  P. Boyd,et al.  Application of phase-induced lateralization to the Stenger test. , 1991, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[31]  S. Ogawa Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast-dependent oxygenation , 1990 .