Predicting Intrinsic Motivation.

Intrinsic motivation can be predicted from participants’ perceptions of the social environment and the task environment (Ryan & Deci, 2000)in terms of control, relatedness and competence. To determine the degree of independence of these factors 251 students in higher vocational education (physiotherapy and hotel management) indicated the extent to which they perceived control, relatedness, and competence in different types of education, their motivation to learn, and their study behaviors. Principal component analysis showed that the perceptions of control, relatedness and competence are so strongly related that when students rate one of the constructs negatively, such as their perception of the task control, they will also rate the others (relatedness and perception of competence) more negatively. These results were confirmed by analyses of two additional data sets. Consequences for measurement issues and motivational science are discussed. Predicting Intrinsic Motivation In the past two decades there has been a strongly renewed interest in the study of motivation in relation to learning. Simon (1995), for example, noted that it “is imperative for progress in instructional methods that we deal simultaneously with cognition and motivation in our research... We already have too much medicine that is (cognitively) good for the patient – who will not take it and medicine that patients find delicious – but that contributes little to their cognitive abilities”(p. 508). Pintrich (2003) described this as a motivation science coming into being. This interest has much to do with a new view on education. Simons, van der Linden, and Duffy (2000) for example stress new instructional methods (in their words “new learning”) such as independent learning, discovery learning, experiential learning, self-directed learning, problem-oriented education, simulations, and work-based learning. To a large extent, these methods are based on constructivism in which, according to Reiser (2001), learners are responsible for their own learning process. Such self-regulated learners are motivated, independent, and metacognitively active participants in their own learning (e.g., Bastiaens & Martens, 2000; Dalgarno, 1998; Duffy, Herrington & Oliver, 2000; Lowyck & Jonassen, 1993; Pierce & Jones, 1998; Wolters, 1998). All of these instructional methods hold that stimulating motivation is crucial in learning, but while an increasing number of researchers are trying to link instructional strategies, motivational processes and learning outcomes (Ellinger, 2004; Garris, Ahlers & Driskell, 2002), the research evidence is still “embryonic” (Garris et al., p. 442). Motivation is not an easy concept to define because it is related to many partly overlapping theoretical constructs (Norwich, 1999). On the one hand it is be seen as a relatively stable personality trait (e.g., Sheldon, Ryan, & Reis, 1996), while on the other hand it is seen to vary from situation to situation (e.g., Boekaerts & Minnaert, 2003). This article sees motivation as the latter case and finds its roots in the work of Ryan and Deci (2000) who distinguish between extrinsic motivation, which refers to the performance of an activity in order to attain a certain outcome, and intrinsic motivation, which refers to doing an activity for the inherent satisfaction of the activity itself. The effort or motivation on which constructivist learning environments try to rely is typically intrinsic motivation, with its associated features as curiosity, deep level learning, explorative behavior and self regulation (Martens, Gulikers, & Bastiaens, in press). Research has shown that intrinsically motivated students exhibit study behaviors that can be described as explorative, reflective, self-regulated, and aimed at deep level processing (e.g., Boekaerts & Minnaert, 2003; Martens et al, in press; Ryan & Deci, 2000). Ryan and Deci developed a model to explain and predict the persistence of intrinsic motivation. They state : “...our theory of motivation does not concern what causes intrinsic motivation (which we see as an

[1]  E. Deci,et al.  On the Importance of Self-Determination for Intrinsically-Motivated Behavior , 1978 .

[2]  R. Ryan,et al.  Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. , 1983 .

[3]  E. Deci,et al.  The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality , 1985 .

[4]  E. Deci,et al.  The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  D. Main,et al.  Children's preference for challenge: the role of perceived competence and control. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Mable B. Kinzie,et al.  Learner Control and Achievement in Science Computer-Assisted Instruction. , 1988 .

[7]  Terry E. Duncan,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. , 1989, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[8]  R. Ryan,et al.  Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Susan Harter,et al.  Causes, correlates, and the functional role of global self-worth: A life-span perspective. , 1990 .

[10]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[11]  E H Wagner,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for smoking cessation. , 1990, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[12]  E. Deci,et al.  Ego-involved persistence: When free-choice behavior is not intrinsically motivated , 1991 .

[13]  Michael E. Enzle,et al.  Surveillant intentions and intrinsic motivation. , 1993 .

[14]  Ann Marie Ryan,et al.  The Big Five in Personnel Selection: Factor Structure in Applicant and Nonapplicant Populations , 1993 .

[15]  M. Barrett,et al.  Use of techniques promoting students' self-determination: Effects on students' analytic problem-solving skills , 1993 .

[16]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Need for cognition and desire for control as moderators of extrinsic reward effects: a person x situation approach to the study of intrinsic motivation. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Designing Environments for Constructive Learning , 2012, NATO ASI Series.

[18]  James P. Raffini 150 Ways to Increase Intrinsic Motivation in the Classroom , 1995 .

[19]  M. Lepper,et al.  Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. , 1996 .

[20]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Elements of the Competitive Situation that Affect Intrinsic Motivation , 1996 .

[21]  Frode Svartdal,et al.  Effect of reward on subjective autonomy and interest when initial interest is low. , 1996 .

[22]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Measurement Error in Psychological Research: Lessons From 26 Research Scenarios , 1996 .

[23]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  What Makes for a Good Day? Competence and Autonomy in the Day and in the Person , 1996 .

[24]  R. Vallerand,et al.  Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: toward a motivational model of high school dropout. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Penny Oldfather,et al.  Intrinsic motivations, literacy, and assessment practices: `That's my grade. That"s me." , 1997 .

[26]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  The Role of Choice in Reader Engagement , 1998 .

[27]  Paul R. Pintrich,et al.  Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms , 1998 .

[28]  Kathleen E. Cox,et al.  Creating Contexts for Involvement in Mathematics. , 1998 .

[29]  Linda Rhoades,et al.  Does Pay for Performance Increase or Decrease Perceived Self-Determination and Intrinsic Motivation? , 1999 .

[30]  E. Deci,et al.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  Pupils' reasons for learning and behaving and for not learning and behaving in English and maths lessons in a secondary school. , 1999, The British journal of educational psychology.

[32]  Jan Herrington,et al.  An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments , 2000 .

[33]  M. Lepper,et al.  The Construction of Preference: When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2006 .

[34]  Theo Bastiaens,et al.  Conditions for Web-Based Learning with Real Events , 2000 .

[35]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[36]  N. Ntoumanis,et al.  A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[37]  Alfred P. Rovai,et al.  Classroom community at a distance: A comparative analysis of two ALN-based university programs , 2001, Internet High. Educ..

[38]  David F. Bjorklund,et al.  The evolved child , 2002 .

[39]  Luc G. Pelletier,et al.  Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers' motivation and teaching behaviors. , 2002 .

[40]  A. Pellegrini,et al.  The Origins of Human Nature: Evolutionary Developmental Psychology , 2003 .

[41]  M. Lepper,et al.  The effects of praise on children's intrinsic motivation: a review and synthesis. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  James E. Driskell,et al.  Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model , 2002 .

[43]  P. Pintrich A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. , 2003 .

[44]  Alexander Minnaert,et al.  Assessment of Students’ Feelings of Autonomy, Competence, and Social Relatedness: A New Approach to Measuring the Quality of the Learning Process through Self- and Peer Assessment , 2003 .

[45]  J. Reeve,et al.  Testing models of the experience of self-determination in intrinsic motivation and the conundrum of choice. , 2003 .

[46]  E. Skinner,et al.  Sense of Relatedness as a Factor in Children's Academic Engagement and Performance. , 2003 .

[47]  Patricia L. Hardré,et al.  A motivational model of rural students' intentions to persist in, versus drop out of, high school , 2003 .

[48]  M. Bruinsma,et al.  Leidt hogere motivatie tot betere prestaties? Motivatie, informatieverwerking en studievoortgang in het hoger onderwijs , 2003 .

[49]  Theo J. Bastiaens,et al.  The impact of intrinsic motivation on e-learning in authentic computer tasks , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[50]  Hans van Buuren,et al.  Determining Sociability, Social Space, and Social Presence in (A)synchronous Collaborative Groups , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[51]  Ted Thompson,et al.  Failure–avoidance: parenting, the achievement environment of the home and strategies for reduction , 2004 .

[52]  Jenefer Husman,et al.  Effects of Time Perspective on Student Motivation: Introduction to a Special Issue , 2004 .

[53]  Andrea D. Ellinger The Concept of Self-Directed Learning and Its Implications for Human Resource Development , 2004 .

[54]  Richard M. Ryan,et al.  Autonomy and Competence in German and American University Students: A Comparative Study Based on Self-Determination Theory. , 2004 .