Association of Prehospital Mode of Transport With Mortality in Penetrating Trauma: A Trauma System–Level Assessment of Private Vehicle Transportation vs Ground Emergency Medical Services

Importance Time to definitive care following injury is important to the outcomes of trauma patients. Prehospital trauma care is provided based on policies developed by individual trauma systems and is an important component of the care of injured patients. Given a paucity of systems-level trauma research, considerable variability exists in prehospital care policies across trauma systems, potentially affecting patient outcomes. Objective To evaluate whether private vehicle prehospital transport confers a survival advantage vs ground emergency medical services (EMS) transport following penetrating injuries in urban trauma systems. Design, Setting, and Participants Retrospective cohort study of data included in the National Trauma Data Bank from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2012, comprising 298 level 1 and level 2 trauma centers that contribute data to the National Trauma Data Bank that are located within the 100 most populous metropolitan areas in the United States. Of 2 329 446 patients assessed for eligibility, 103 029 were included in this study. All patients were 16 years or older, had a gunshot wound or stab wound, and were transported by ground EMS or private vehicle. Main Outcome and Measure In-hospital mortality. Results Of the 2 329 446 records assessed for eligibility, 103 029 individuals at 298 urban level 1 and level 2 trauma centers were included in the analysis. The study population was predominantly male (87.6%), with a mean age of 32.3 years. Among those included, 47.9% were black, 26.3% were white, and 18.4% were Hispanic. Following risk adjustment, individuals with penetrating injuries transported by private vehicle were less likely to die than patients transported by ground EMS (odds ratio [OR], 0.38; 95% CI, 0.31-0.47). This association remained statistically significant on stratified analysis of the gunshot wound (OR,  0.45; 95% CI, 0.36-0.56) and stab wound (OR,  0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.52) subgroups. Conclusions and Relevance Private vehicle transport is associated with a significantly lower likelihood of death when compared with ground EMS transport for individuals with gunshot wounds and stab wounds in urban US trauma systems. System-level evidence such as this can be a valuable tool for those responsible for developing and implementing policies at the trauma system level.

[1]  S. Kaiser Association of Prehospital Mode of Transport with Mortality in Penetrating Trauma: A Trauma System-Level Assessment of Private Vehicle Transportation vs Ground Emergency Medical Services , 2018, The Journal of Emergency Medicine.

[2]  L. Jacobs,et al.  A Call to Action to Develop Programs for Bystanders to Control Severe Bleeding. , 2016, JAMA surgery.

[3]  E. Haut,et al.  Police transport versus ground EMS: A trauma system-level evaluation of prehospital care policies and their effect on clinical outcomes , 2016, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[4]  L. Jacobs The Hartford Consensus III: Implementation of Bleeding Control--If you see something do something. , 2015, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.

[5]  L. Jacobs The Hartford Consensus III: Implementation of Bleeding Control: If you see something do something. , 2015, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.

[6]  Samuel M. Galvagno,et al.  Increased mortality associated with EMS transport of gunshot wound victims when compared to private vehicle transport. , 2014, Injury.

[7]  Rama A Salhi,et al.  Severity-adjusted mortality in trauma patients transported by police. , 2014, Annals of emergency medicine.

[8]  E. Mackenzie,et al.  Developing best practices to study trauma outcomes in large databases: An evidence-based approach to determine the best mortality risk adjustment model , 2014, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[9]  A. Nathens,et al.  Are all deaths recorded equally? The impact of hospice care on risk-adjusted mortality , 2014, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[10]  P. Pronovost,et al.  Association Between Helicopter vs Ground Emergency Medical Services and Survival for Adults With Major Trauma , 2013 .

[11]  T. Esposito,et al.  Pre-hospital transport times and survival for Hypotensive patients with penetrating thoracic trauma , 2013, Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock.

[12]  Kent A Stevens,et al.  Influence of the National Trauma Data Bank on the study of trauma outcomes: is it time to set research best practices to further enhance its impact? , 2012, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[13]  P. Pronovost,et al.  Original Contribution Association between Helicopter Vs Ground Emergency Medical Services and Survival for Adults with Major Trauma Downloaded From: Http://jama.jamanetwork.com/ by a Helsebiblioteket Gir Deg Tilgang Til Jama User on 05/31/2012 , 2022 .

[14]  D. Chang,et al.  Prehospital Intravenous Fluid Administration Is Associated With Higher Mortality in Trauma Patients: A National Trauma Data Bank Analysis , 2011, Annals of surgery.

[15]  B. Carr,et al.  Injury-adjusted mortality of patients transported by police following penetrating trauma. , 2011, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[16]  Kent A. Stevens,et al.  Multiple imputation in trauma disparity research. , 2011, The Journal of surgical research.

[17]  Justin B Dimick,et al.  Introduction to propensity scores: A case study on the comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. , 2010, Archives of surgery.

[18]  D. Chang,et al.  Spine immobilization in penetrating trauma: more harm than good? , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[19]  Douglas L Packer,et al.  Contemporary management of atrial fibrillation: update on anticoagulation and invasive management strategies. , 2009, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[20]  M. Seamon,et al.  Prehospital procedures before emergency department thoracotomy: "scoop and run" saves lives. , 2007, The Journal of trauma.

[21]  Daniel O Scharfstein,et al.  A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  D. Cone Multicenter Canadian study of prehospital trauma care , 2004 .

[23]  Teri L. Sanddal,et al.  Effect of a voluntary trauma system on preventable death and inappropriate care in a rural state. , 2003, The Journal of trauma.

[24]  Thomas M Scalea,et al.  Endotracheal intubation in the field does not improve outcome in trauma patients who present without an acutely lethal traumatic brain injury. , 2003, The Journal of trauma.

[25]  J. Sampalis,et al.  Advanced or basic life support for trauma: meta-analysis and critical review of the literature. , 2000, The Journal of trauma.

[26]  K. Hennigan,et al.  Emergency medical services (EMS) vs non-EMS transport of critically injured patients: a prospective evaluation. , 2000, Archives of surgery.

[27]  J. Hedges,et al.  Does out-of-hospital EMS time affect trauma survival? , 1995, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[28]  P E Pepe,et al.  Immediate versus delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  J P Smith,et al.  Prehospital stabilization of critically injured patients: a failed concept. , 1985, The Journal of trauma.

[30]  R. Cales Trauma mortality in Orange County: the effect of implementation of a regional trauma system. , 1984, Annals of emergency medicine.

[31]  A. Franklin,et al.  University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. , 1983, Cutis.

[32]  R. Fischer,et al.  The importance of prompt transport of salvage of patients with penetrating heart wounds. , 1982, The Journal of trauma.

[33]  J. G. West,et al.  Systems of trauma care. A study of two counties. , 1979, Archives of surgery.