Taylor Series Models in Deterministic Global Optimization

Deterministic global optimization requires a global search with rejection of subregions. To reject a subregion, bounds on the range of the constraints and objective function can be used. Although often effective, simple interval arithmetic sometimes gives impractically large bounds on the ranges. However, Taylor models as developed by Berz et al may be effective in this context. Efficient incorporation of such models in a general global optimization package is a significant project. Here, we use the system COSY-INFINITY by Berz et al to study the bounds on the range of various order Taylor models for certain difficult test problems we have previously encountered. Based on that, we conclude that Taylor models may be useful for some, but not all, problems in verified global optimization. Forthcoming improvements in the COSY-INFINITY interface will help us reach stronger conclusions. 1 Deterministic Global Optimization Deterministic global optimization involves exhaustive search over the domain. The domain is subdivided (“branching”), and those subdomains that cannot possibly contain global minimizers are rejected. For example, if the problem is the unconstrained problem Enclose the minimizers of φ(x) subject to x ∈ x, (1.1) then evaluating φ at a particular point x gives an upper bound for the global minimum of φ over the region x. Some method is then used to bound the range of φ over subregions x ⊂ x. If the lower bound φ, so obtained, for φ over x has φ > φ(x), then x may be rejected as not containing any global optima; see Figure 1 for the situation in one dimension. A related problem is that of finding all roots within a given region, that is, Enclose all x with f(x) = 0 subject to x ∈ x. (1.2) 2 R. Baker Kearfott, Alvard Arazyan In equation (1.2), bounds on f over a subregion x ⊂ x are obtained; denote the interval vector representing such bounds by f(x). If 0 6∈ f(x), that is, unless the lower bound for each component of f is less than zero and the upper bound is greater than zero, then there cannot be a solution of f(x) = 0 in x, and x can be rejected.

[1]  Martin Berz,et al.  Computation and Application of Taylor Polynomials with Interval Remainder Bounds , 1998, Reliab. Comput..

[2]  Eldon Hansen,et al.  Global optimization using interval analysis , 1992, Pure and applied mathematics.

[3]  Suiunbek Ibraev,et al.  A new parallel method for verified global optimization , 2002 .

[4]  Tibor Csendes,et al.  On the selection of subdivision directions in interval branch-and-bound methods for global optimization , 1995, J. Glob. Optim..

[5]  R. Baker Kearfott Empirical Evaluation of Innovations in Interval Branch and Bound Algorithms for Nonlinear Systems , 1997, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[6]  V. Kreinovich Computational Complexity and Feasibility of Data Processing and Interval Computations , 1997 .

[7]  Martin Berz,et al.  New applications of Taylor model methods , 2000 .

[8]  M. Berz,et al.  COSY INFINITY and Its Applications in Nonlinear Dynamics , 1996 .

[9]  Martin Berz,et al.  Exact Bounds on the Long Term Stability of Weakly Nonlinear Systems Applied to the Design of Large S , 1994 .

[10]  Martin Berz,et al.  Efficient Control of the Dependency Problem Based on Taylor Model Methods , 1999, Reliab. Comput..

[11]  G. William Walster,et al.  On stopping criteria in verified nonlinear systems or optimization algorithms , 2000, TOMS.

[12]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  Numerica: A Modeling Language for Global Optimization , 1997, IJCAI.

[13]  M. Berz ALGORITHMS FOR HIGHER ORDER AUTOMATIC DIFFERENTIATION IN MANY VARIABLES WITH APPLICATIONS TO BEAM PHYSICS , 1991 .

[14]  T. Csendes,et al.  A review of subdivision direction selection in interval methods for global optimization , 1997 .

[15]  R. B. Kearfott Rigorous Global Search: Continuous Problems , 1996 .