Game Analysis of the Evolution of Local Government’s River Chief System Implementation Strategy

As the executor of the River Chief System (RCS), local governments’ choice of implementation strategies directly affects the quality of regional water environment. The implementation of the RCS involves many interest subjects, and has gradually formed a game between enterprises’ sewage management and local governments’ RCS implementation strategies, and a game between the RCS implementation strategies of different local governments. The game behavior between the interested parties is long-term and dynamic in nature. Strategies such as reducing the cost of local governments’ implementation of the RCS and increasing the rate of sewage charges will lead to the evolution of the strategy set between enterprises’ treatment of sewage and local governments’ RCS implementation in the direction of {complete treatment of sewage, strictly enforcing the RCS}. Analysis of the evolutionary game model between the local governments reveals that strategies such as reducing the weight of economic indicators in local governments’ assessment, and increasing the material and spiritual rewards for implementing the RCS, will lead to the evolutionary game outcome of implementing the RCS between the local governments in the direction of {strictly enforcing the RCS, strictly enforcing the RCS}. The external effects of sewage discharge do not affect the evolution of the game system between the local governments.

[1]  Dali L. Yang,et al.  Environmental regulation, local legislation and pollution control in China , 2021, Environment and Development Economics.

[2]  Bing Zhang,et al.  Watering Down Environmental Regulation in China* , 2020, The Quarterly Journal of Economics.

[3]  Shuang Li,et al.  Evolutionary game analysis of coal-mine enterprise internal safety inspection system in China based on system dynamics , 2020 .

[4]  Juan Wang,et al.  Effect of water pollution control on provincial boundaries of River-Director System: based on the study of the Yangtze River valley in China , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[5]  Norimichi Matsueda Collective vs. individual lobbying , 2020, European Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  Wanhao Zhang,et al.  Achieve Sustainable development of rivers with water resource management - economic model of river chief system in China. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  Weimin Ma,et al.  What Drives Green Innovation? A Game Theoretic Analysis of Government Subsidy and Cooperation Contract , 2019, Sustainability.

[8]  B. Harstad,et al.  Gridlock and Inefficient Policy Instruments , 2019, Theoretical Economics.

[9]  Bing Zhang,et al.  Environmental regulation, emissions and productivity: Evidence from Chinese COD-emitting manufacturers , 2018, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.

[10]  Scott C. James,et al.  The Brexit Negotiations and Financial Services: A Two-Level Game Analysis , 2018, The Political Quarterly.

[11]  Jun Zhuang,et al.  Supervision after Certification: An Evolutionary Game Analysis for Chinese Environmental Labeled Enterprises , 2018 .

[12]  R. Amir,et al.  On Environmental Regulation of Oligopoly Markets: Emission versus Performance Standards , 2018 .

[13]  J. Coria,et al.  Prices vs quantities with multiple pollutants , 2013 .