Effects of feedback and peer pressure on contributions to enterprise social media

Increasingly, large organizations are experimenting with internal social media (e.g., blogs, forums) as a platform for widespread distributed collaboration. Contributions to their counterparts outside the organization's firewall are driven by attention from strangers, in addition to sharing among friends. However, employees in a workplace under time pressures may be reluctant to participate and the audience for their contributions is comparatively smaller. Participation rates also vary widely from group to group. So what influences people to contribute in this environment? In this paper, we present the results of a year-long empirical study of internal social media participation at a large technology company, and analyze the impact attention, feedback, and managers' and coworkers' participation have on employees' behavior. We find feedback in the form of posted comments is highly correlated with a user's subsequent participation. Recent manager and coworker activity relate to users initiating or resuming participation in social media. These findings extend, to an aggregate level, the results from prior interviews about blogging at the company and offer design and policy implications for organizations seeking to encourage social media adoption.

[1]  C. Manski Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem , 1993 .

[2]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[3]  Daniel R. Fesenmaier,et al.  Assessing Motivation of Contribution in Online Communities: An Empirical Investigation of an Online Travel Community , 1998, Electron. Mark..

[4]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Influence and correlation in social networks , 2008, KDD.

[5]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities , 2008, KDD.

[6]  Rachel K. E. Bellamy,et al.  BlogCentral: the role of internal blogs at work , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[7]  Fang Wu,et al.  How Public Opinion Forms , 2008, WINE.

[8]  D. Collett,et al.  Modelling Binary Data. , 1994 .

[10]  C. Steglich,et al.  8. Dynamic Networks and Behavior: Separating Selection from Influence , 2010 .

[11]  C. Steglich,et al.  DYNAMIC NETWORKS AND BEHAVIOR: SEPARATING SELECTION FROM INFLUENCE: separating selection from influence , 2010 .

[12]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  The Attention economy , 2001, UBIQ.

[13]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[14]  Eric A. von Hippel,et al.  How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance? , 2000 .

[15]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Understanding Effects of Proximity on Collaboration: Implications for Technologies to Support Remote Collaborative Work , 2002 .

[16]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Motivations for social networking at work , 2008, CSCW.

[17]  Dennis M. Wilkinson,et al.  Strong regularities in online peer production , 2008, EC '08.

[18]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities , 2006, CHI.

[19]  William W. S. Wei,et al.  Time series analysis - univariate and multivariate methods , 1989 .

[20]  Xin Li,et al.  Using Social Psychology to Motivate Contributions to Online Communities , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[21]  David R. Millen,et al.  Dogear: Social bookmarking in the enterprise , 2006, CHI.

[22]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  --Understanding Effects of Proximity on Collaboration : Implications for Technologies to Support Remote Collaborative Work , 2001 .

[23]  L. Lawley Corporate Blogging: Building community through persistent digital talk , 2006 .

[24]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  On the Structure, Properties and Utility of Internal Corporate Blogs , 2007, ICWSM.

[25]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm , 2001, ArXiv.

[26]  Fang Wu,et al.  Social Networks that Matter: Twitter Under the Microscope , 2008, First Monday.

[27]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Crossing Boundaries: A Case Study of Employee Blogging , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[28]  Fang Wu,et al.  Crowdsourcing, attention and productivity , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[29]  J. Kaczorowski,et al.  On the structure , 1999 .

[30]  Jonathan D. Cryer,et al.  Time Series Analysis , 1986 .

[31]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Community Effort in Online Groups: Who Does the Work and Why? , 2007 .

[32]  Li Sheng-mei,et al.  On the Structure of "秀才秀才,错字布袋 , 2003 .

[33]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Follow the (slash) dot: effects of feedback on new members in an online community , 2005, GROUP.

[34]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Mind your Ps and Qs: the impact of politeness and rudeness in online communities , 2008, CSCW.

[35]  Stephen Farrell,et al.  Socially augmenting employee profiles with people-tagging , 2007, UIST.

[36]  Bernard Fortin,et al.  Identification of Peer Effects through Social Networks , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[37]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[38]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Reputation systems , 2000, CACM.

[39]  Paul R. Cohen,et al.  Empirical methods for artificial intelligence , 1995, IEEE Expert.

[40]  Scott A. Golder,et al.  Blogging at work and the corporate attention economy , 2009, CHI.

[41]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .