Molecular dynamics and accuracy of NMR structures: Effects of error bounds and data removal

The effect of internal dynamics on the accuracy of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structures was studied in detail using model distance restraint sets (DRS) generated from a 6.6 nanosecond molecular dynamics trajectory of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. The model data included the effects of internal dynamics in a very realistic way. Structure calculations using different error estimates were performed with iterative removal of systematically violated restraints. The accuracy of each calculated structure was measured as the atomic root mean square (RMS) difference to the optimized average structure derived from the trajectory by structure factors refinement. Many of the distance restraints were derived from NOEs that were significantly affected by internal dynamics. Depending on the error bounds used, these distance restraints seriously distorted the structure, leading to deviations from the coordinate average of the dynamics trajectory even in rigid regions. Increasing error bounds uniformly for all distance restraints relieved the strain on the structures. However, the accuracy did not improve. Significant improvement of accuracy was obtained by identifying inconsistent restraints with violation analysis, and excluding them from the calculation. The highest accuracy was obtained by setting bounds rather tightly, and removing about a third of the restraints. The limiting accuracy for all backbone atoms was between 0.6 and 0.7 Å. Also, the precision of the structures increased with removal of inconsistent restraints, indicating that a high precision is not simply the consequence of tight error bounds but of the consistency of the DRS. The precision consistently overestimated the accuracy. Proteins 1999;34:453–463. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  I. Solomon Relaxation Processes in a System of Two Spins , 1955 .

[2]  J. Deisenhofer,et al.  Crystallographic refinement of the structure of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor at l.5 Å resolution , 1975 .

[3]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[4]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1978, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[5]  G. Lipari Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules , 1982 .

[6]  A. Szabó,et al.  Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 1. Theory and range of validity , 1982 .

[7]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[8]  Timothy F. Havel,et al.  A distance geometry program for determining the structures of small proteins and other macromolecules from nuclear magnetic resonance measurements of intramolecular1H−1H proximities in solution , 1984 .

[9]  Timothy F. Havel,et al.  An evaluation of the combined use of nuclear magnetic resonance and distance geometry for the determination of protein conformations in solution. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  K. Wüthrich NMR of proteins and nucleic acids , 1988 .

[11]  A. Lesk,et al.  The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[12]  Timothy F. Havel,et al.  Protein structures in solution by nuclear magnetic resonance and distance geometry. The polypeptide fold of the basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor determined using two different algorithms, DISGEO and DISMAN. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  C. Woodward,et al.  Structure of form III crystals of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  Michael Nilges,et al.  A simple method for delineating well‐defined and variable regions in protein structures determined from interproton distance data , 1987 .

[15]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Determination of three‐dimensional structures of proteins from interproton distance data by hybrid distance geometry‐dynamical simulated annealing calculations , 1988, FEBS letters.

[16]  L. Kay,et al.  Protein dynamics and distance determination by NOE measurements , 1988, FEBS letters.

[17]  M Karplus,et al.  Polar hydrogen positions in proteins: Empirical energy placement and neutron diffraction comparison , 1988, Proteins.

[18]  J H Prestegard,et al.  A dynamic model for the structure of acyl carrier protein in solution. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[19]  B. Brooks,et al.  The effects of truncating long‐range forces on protein dynamics , 1989, Proteins.

[20]  R. Huber,et al.  Accurate Bond and Angle Parameters for X-ray Protein Structure Refinement , 1991 .

[21]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  A novel, highly stable fold of the immunoglobulin binding domain of streptococcal protein G. , 1993, Science.

[22]  K Wüthrich,et al.  Efficient computation of three-dimensional protein structures in solution from nuclear magnetic resonance data using the program DIANA and the supporting programs CALIBA, HABAS and GLOMSA. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  T. James Relaxation matrix analysis of two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser effect spectra , 1991 .

[24]  P A Kollman,et al.  Are time-averaged restraints necessary for nuclear magnetic resonance refinement? A model study for DNA. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  C. Post Internal motional averaging and three-dimensional structure determination by nuclear magnetic resonance. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  Axel T. Brunger,et al.  X-PLOR Version 3.1: A System for X-ray Crystallography and NMR , 1992 .

[27]  M. Karplus,et al.  Influence of rapid intramolecular motion on NMR cross-relaxation rates. A molecular dynamics study of antamanide in solution , 1992 .

[28]  T F Havel,et al.  The solution structure of eglin c based on measurements of many NOEs and coupling constants and its comparison with X‐ray structures , 1992, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[29]  R. Brueschweiler Normal modes and NMR order parameters in proteins , 1992 .

[30]  K Wüthrich,et al.  Determination of a high-quality nuclear magnetic resonance solution structure of the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor and comparison with three crystal structures. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Assessing the quality of solution nuclear magnetic resonance structures by complete cross-validation. , 1993, Science.

[32]  J. Thornton,et al.  PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures , 1993 .

[33]  M. Sippl Recognition of errors in three‐dimensional structures of proteins , 1993, Proteins.

[34]  W. Braun,et al.  Extensive distance geometry calculations with different NOE calibrations: New criteria for structure selection applied to Sandostatin and BPTI , 1993, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[35]  C. Sander,et al.  Quality control of protein models : directional atomic contact analysis , 1993 .

[36]  G M Clore,et al.  Exploring the limits of precision and accuracy of protein structures determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  Michael Nilges,et al.  Structure of the pleckstrin homology domain from β-spectrin , 1994, Nature.

[38]  D. Fushman,et al.  Determination of the backbone mobility of ribonuclease T1 and its 2'GMP complex using molecular dynamics simulations and NMR relaxation data. , 1994, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[39]  D. Pearlman,et al.  How well do time-averaged J-coupling restraints work? , 1994, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[40]  O. Jardetzky,et al.  An assessment of the precision and accuracy of protein structures determined by NMR. Dependence on distance errors. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  A T Brünger,et al.  Helix packing in proteins: Prediction and energetic analysis of dimeric, trimeric, and tetrameric GCN4 coiled coil structures , 1994, Proteins.

[42]  David A. Pearlman,et al.  How is an NMR structure best defined? An analysis of molecular dynamics distance-based approaches , 1994, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[43]  W. Braun,et al.  Pattern recognition and self‐correcting distance geometry calculations applied to myohemerythrin , 1994, FEBS letters.

[44]  C. Schiffer,et al.  Accounting for molecular mobility in structure determination based on nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic and X-ray diffraction data. , 1994, Methods in enzymology.

[45]  R. Abseher,et al.  NMR cross-relaxation investigated by molecular dynamics simulation: a case study of ubiquitin in solution. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[46]  A. Brünger,et al.  Conformational variability of solution nuclear magnetic resonance structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  W. Braun,et al.  Predicting the helix packing of globular proteins by self‐correcting distance geometry , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[48]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Structures of protein complexes by multidimensional heteronuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. , 1995, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[49]  W. Braun,et al.  Automated assignment of simulated and experimental NOESY spectra of proteins by feedback filtering and self-correcting distance geometry. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[50]  C. W. Hilbers,et al.  Solution structure of the single‐stranded DNA binding protein of the filamentous Pseudomonas phage Pf3: similarity to other proteins binding to single‐stranded nucleic acids. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[51]  A T Brünger,et al.  Do NOE distances contain enough information to assess the relative populations of multi-conformer structures? , 1996, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[52]  H Oschkinat,et al.  Automated NOESY interpretation with ambiguous distance restraints: the refined NMR solution structure of the pleckstrin homology domain from beta-spectrin. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[53]  Michael Nilges,et al.  Ambiguous NOEs and automated NOE assignment , 1998 .

[54]  R. Abseher,et al.  Are there non-trivial dynamic cross-correlations in proteins? , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[55]  R. Abseher,et al.  Essential spaces defined by NMR structure ensembles and molecular dynamics simulation show significant overlap , 1998, Proteins.

[56]  A T Brünger,et al.  Influence of internal dynamics on accuracy of protein NMR structures: derivation of realistic model distance data from a long molecular dynamics trajectory. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.