Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams

We examine how knowledge and experience affect both the mean and variance values of innovations from individuals and teams. We apply and extend theory on innovativeness and creativity to propose that holding multiple knowledge domains produces novel combinations that increase the variance of product performance; and that extensive experience produces outputs with high average performance. We analyzed innovations in the comic book industry, finding that innovations with extreme success and failure are affected by similar factors as high-performing innovations. Multi-member teams and teams with experience working together produced innovations with greater variation in value, but individuals were able to combine knowledge diversity more effectively than teams.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[2]  J. Mathieu,et al.  CREATIVITY AND STANDARDIZATION: COMPLEMENTARY OR CONFLICTING DRIVERS OF TEAM EFFECTIVENESS? , 2005 .

[3]  S. Hall,et al.  Surviving Radical Technological Change through Dynamic Capability : Evidence from the Typesetter Industry , 2005 .

[4]  C. Shalley,et al.  A Little Creativity Goes a Long Way: An Examination of Teams’ Engagement in Creative Processes , 2004 .

[5]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Diversity and creativity in work groups: A dynamic perspective on the affective and cognitive processes that link diversity and performance. , 2003 .

[7]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective , 2003 .

[8]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[9]  D. Harrison,et al.  Time, Teams, and Task Performance: Changing Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning , 2002 .

[10]  M. West.  Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups , 2002 .

[11]  P. Paulus.  Different Ponds for Different Fish: A Contrasting Perspective on Team Innovation , 2002 .

[12]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Creativity and group innovation , 2002 .

[13]  Sharon Bailin.  CREATIVITY IN CONTEXT , 2002 .

[14]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Minority dissent and team innovation: the importance of participation in decision making. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  From Guilford to Creative Synergy: Opening the Black Box of Team-Level Creativity , 2001 .

[16]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data , 2001 .

[17]  J. Ruiz Moreno.  [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[18]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[19]  John M. Mezias,et al.  Resource Partitioning, the Founding of Specialist Firms, and Innovation: The American Feature Film Industry, 1912--1929 , 2000 .

[20]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Innovations as Catalysts for Organizational Change: Shifts in Organizational Cognition and Search , 2000 .

[21]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[22]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958– 19901 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  Robert K. Kazanjian,et al.  Multilevel Theorizing about Creativity in Organizations: A Sensemaking Perspective , 1999 .

[24]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[25]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[26]  L. Argote.  Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[27]  D. Simonton.  Creativity as Blind Variation and Selective Retention : Is the Creative Process Darwinian ? , 2022 .

[28]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  Being Different Yet Feeling Similar: The Influence Of Demographic Composition And Organizational Culture On Work Processes And Outcomes , 1998 .

[29]  R. Weisberg.  Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. , 1998 .

[30]  Steve Duin,et al.  Comics: Between the Panels , 1998 .

[31]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[32]  Gregory J. Feist.  Handbook of Creativity: The Influence of Personality on Artistic and Scientific Creativity , 1998 .

[33]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[34]  Paul E. Tesluk,et al.  Influences of Organizational Culture and Climate on Individual Creativity. , 1997 .

[35]  R. Simon.  The consequences of “diversity” , 1996 .

[36]  N. Anderson,et al.  Innovation in top management teams , 1996 .

[37]  C. Ford.  A Theory of Individual Creative Action in Multiple Social Domains , 1996 .

[38]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[39]  J. R Hackman,et al.  Organizations in Changing Environments: The Case of East German Symphony Orchestras , 1996 .

[40]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Resource-Based View of the Firm in Two Environments: The Hollywood Film Studios From 1936 to 1965 , 1996 .

[41]  M. Field.  Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity , 1996 .

[42]  R. Saavedra,et al.  A naturalistic minority influence experiment: Effects on divergent thinking, conflict and originality in work‐groups , 1996 .

[43]  John D. Rogers,et al.  Dissent and the search for information. , 1996 .

[44]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[45]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Jumping Ship: The Diffusion of Strategy Abandonment , 1995 .

[46]  Daniel J. Brass.  Creativity: It's all in Your Social Network , 1995 .

[47]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[48]  Terry L. Amburgey,et al.  Strategic momentum: The effects of repetitive, positional, and contextual momentum on merger activity , 1992 .

[49]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  TOP MANAGEMENT, STRATEGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE STRUCTURES , 1992 .

[50]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[51]  Lars Gyllensten,et al.  Intelligence and Creativity , 1991 .

[52]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[53]  L. Argote,et al.  The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings , 1990 .

[54]  P. Hirsch.  PROCESSING FADS AND FASHIONS , 1990 .

[55]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The Lid on the Garbage Can: Institutional Constraints on Decision Making in the Technical Core of College-Text Publishers. , 1989 .

[56]  S. Stewman.  Organizational demography. , 1988, Annual review of sociology.

[57]  H. Simon,et al.  Rationality in Psychology and Economics , 1986 .

[58]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Learning from Experience in Organizations , 1985 .

[59]  Lung-fei Lee.  Generalized Econometric Models with Selectivity , 1983 .

[60]  T. M. Amabile.  The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. , 1983 .

[61]  T. M. Amabile.  Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. , 1982 .

[62]  R. Katz.  The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance. , 1982 .

[63]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[64]  M. Lessnoff.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1979 .

[65]  M. Bougon.  Cognition in Organizations: An Analysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra. , 1977 .

[66]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[67]  D. Forte.  Supreme Court Justices , 1973 .

[68]  S. Parnes,et al.  Applied Creativity: The Creative Studies Project: Part II--Results of the Two-Year Program. , 1972 .

[69]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[70]  P. Hirsch.  Processing Fads and Fashions: An Organization-Set Analysis of Cultural Industry Systems , 1972, American Journal of Sociology.

[71]  D. Campbell.  Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. , 1960, Psychological review.

[72]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[73]  Douglas N. Morgan.  Creativity Today: A Constructive Analytic Review of Certain Philosophical and Psychological Work , 1953 .

[74]  Frank Bodman,et al.  The Origins of Genius , 1950 .

[75]  D. North.  Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .