Robotic competitions: short term pain for long term gain

In the last two decades many extracurricular robotics competitions have been established for university students, but there has been little academic research on whether they are benecial or detrimental to their target audience. By focusing in-depth on one such competition, National Instruments Autonomous Robotics Competition (NIARC), this paper examines the student experience, academic performance changes and identies other outcomes, that are inuenced by robotic competitions. Although the results cannot be generalised to all students in all such competitions, the paper identies important factors that need to be considered when deciding to promote these competitions to students. The student narrative shows that the competition has positively contributed to their studies, with a GPA analysis of Victoria University of Wellington (VUW) students suggesting improvements for team members in the long term.

[1]  Dale A. Carnegie,et al.  Steps to increase student engagement and retention in first year engineering , 2013, Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE).

[2]  Anna Friesel Learning Robotics by Combining the Theory with Practical Design and Competition in Undergraduate Engineering Education , 2007, Intell. Autom. Soft Comput..

[3]  Susan J. Masten,et al.  Design competitions: does "multidisciplinary" contribute to the team building experience? , 1996, Technology-Based Re-Engineering Engineering Education Proceedings of Frontiers in Education FIE'96 26th Annual Conference.

[4]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  Simultaneous localization and mapping: part I , 2006, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[5]  Javier Ruiz-del-Solar Robotics-Centered Outreach Activities: An Integrated Approach , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[6]  Richard Hansen,et al.  National Instruments LabVIEW: A Programming Environment for Laboratory Automation and Measurement , 2007 .

[7]  H. Turic,et al.  Constructive Education Approach: Robot Soccer , 2007, 2007 29th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces.

[8]  Blaine A. Price,et al.  Using Robotics to Motivate ‘Back Door’ Learning , 2004, Education and Information Technologies.

[9]  Phillip C. Wankat Undergraduate Student Competitions , 2005 .

[10]  Barbara M. Olds,et al.  A Model Curriculum for a Capstone Course in Multidisciplinary Engineering Design , 1994 .

[11]  Rachid Manseur Hardware competitions in engineering education , 2000, 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135).

[12]  E. Wang,et al.  Teaching freshmen design, creativity and programming with LEGOs and Labview , 2001, 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37193).

[13]  Gourab Sen Gupta,et al.  Robotics competitions in engineering eduction , 2000, 2009 4th International Conference on Autonomous Robots and Agents.