ChatGPT and the Future of Digital Health: A Study on Healthcare Workers’ Perceptions and Expectations

This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and intended practices of healthcare workers (HCWs) in Saudi Arabia towards ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI) Chatbot, within the first three months after its launch. We also aimed to identify potential barriers to AI Chatbot adoption among healthcare professionals. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1057 HCWs in Saudi Arabia, distributed electronically via social media channels from 21 February to 6 March 2023. The survey evaluated HCWs’ familiarity with ChatGPT-3.5, their satisfaction, intended future use, and perceived usefulness in healthcare practice. Of the respondents, 18.4% had used ChatGPT for healthcare purposes, while 84.1% of non-users expressed interest in utilizing AI Chatbots in the future. Most participants (75.1%) were comfortable with incorporating ChatGPT into their healthcare practice. HCWs perceived the Chatbot to be useful in various aspects of healthcare, such as medical decision-making (39.5%), patient and family support (44.7%), medical literature appraisal (48.5%), and medical research assistance (65.9%). A majority (76.7%) believed ChatGPT could positively impact the future of healthcare systems. Nevertheless, concerns about credibility and the source of information provided by AI Chatbots (46.9%) were identified as the main barriers. Although HCWs recognize ChatGPT as a valuable addition to digital health in the early stages of adoption, addressing concerns regarding accuracy, reliability, and medicolegal implications is crucial. Therefore, due to their unreliability, the current forms of ChatGPT and other Chatbots should not be used for diagnostic or treatment purposes without human expert oversight. Ensuring the trustworthiness and dependability of AI Chatbots is essential for successful implementation in healthcare settings. Future research should focus on evaluating the clinical outcomes of ChatGPT and benchmarking its performance against other AI Chatbots.

[1]  M. Temsah,et al.  Combining human and AI could predict nephrologies future, but should be handled with care , 2023, Acta paediatrica.

[2]  Satyam Singh,et al.  ChatGPT in medicine: an overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations , 2023, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence.

[3]  M. Temsah,et al.  Enhancing infectious disease response: A demonstrative dialogue with ChatGPT and ChatGPT-4 for future outbreak preparedness , 2023, New microbes and new infections.

[4]  A. Al-Eyadhy,et al.  ChatGPT-4 and the Global Burden of Disease Study: Advancing Personalized Healthcare Through Artificial Intelligence in Clinical and Translational Medicine , 2023, Cureus.

[5]  Khalid H. Malki,et al.  Enhancing Expert Panel Discussions in Pediatric Palliative Care: Innovative Scenario Development and Summarization With ChatGPT-4 , 2023, Cureus.

[6]  Khalid H. Malki,et al.  Overview of Early ChatGPT’s Presence in Medical Literature: Insights From a Hybrid Literature Review by ChatGPT and Human Experts , 2023, Cureus.

[7]  Sébastien Bubeck,et al.  Benefits, Limits, and Risks of GPT-4 as an AI Chatbot for Medicine. , 2023, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Wil M.P. van der Aalst,et al.  Welcome to the Era of ChatGPT et al. , 2023, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[9]  M. Cascella,et al.  Evaluating the Feasibility of ChatGPT in Healthcare: An Analysis of Multiple Clinical and Research Scenarios , 2023, Journal of Medical Systems.

[10]  Purvish M. Parikh,et al.  Judge Juan Manuel Padilla Garcia, ChatGPT, and a controversial medicolegal milestone , 2023, Indian Journal of Medical Sciences.

[11]  A. Al-Eyadhy,et al.  Mitigating the Burden of Severe Pediatric Respiratory Viruses in the Post-COVID-19 Era: ChatGPT Insights and Recommendations. , 2023, Cureus.

[12]  J. Patrinely,et al.  On the cusp: Considering the impact of artificial intelligence language models in healthcare. , 2023, Med.

[13]  G. Adamson.  Explaining Technology We Do Not Understand , 2023, IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society.

[14]  A. Landman,et al.  Assessing the Utility of ChatGPT Throughout the Entire Clinical Workflow , 2023, medRxiv.

[15]  A. McCoy,et al.  Assessing the Value of ChatGPT for Clinical Decision Support Optimization , 2023, medRxiv.

[16]  J. A. Teixeira da Silva,et al.  Can ChatGPT be trusted to provide reliable estimates? , 2023, Accountability in research.

[17]  A. Borji.  A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures , 2023, ArXiv.

[18]  A. Howard,et al.  ChatGPT and antimicrobial advice: the end of the consulting infection doctor? , 2023, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[19]  The Lancet Digital Health.  ChatGPT: friend or foe? , 2023, The Lancet. Digital health.

[20]  M. Temsah,et al.  Reflection with ChatGPT about the excess death after the COVID-19 pandemic , 2023, New Microbes and New Infections.

[21]  E. A. V. van Dis,et al.  ChatGPT: five priorities for research , 2023, Nature.

[22]  Samy I McFarlane,et al.  Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in Scientific Writing , 2023, Cureus.

[23]  B. Gordijn,et al.  ChatGPT: evolution or revolution? , 2023, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy.

[24]  Jianyang Deng,et al.  The Benefits and Challenges of ChatGPT: An Overview , 2023, Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems.

[25]  Tiffany H. Kung,et al.  Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models , 2022, medRxiv.

[26]  O. Winther,et al.  Can large language models reason about medical questions? , 2022, Patterns.

[27]  A. Pan,et al.  Healthcare Workers Attitudes, Practices and Sources of Information for COVID-19 Vaccination: An Italian National Survey , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[28]  A. Al-Eyadhy,et al.  Healthcare workers' COVID-19 Omicron variant uncertainty-related stress, resilience, and coping strategies during the first week of World Health Organization alert , 2021, medRxiv.

[29]  Yoshimi Fukuoka,et al.  A systematic review of artificial intelligence chatbots for promoting physical activity, healthy diet, and weight loss , 2021, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[30]  M. Cannarsa.  Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI , 2021, The Cambridge Handbook of Lawyering in the Digital Age.

[31]  A. Greenshaw,et al.  Developing, Implementing, and Evaluating an Artificial Intelligence–Guided Mental Health Resource Navigation Chatbot for Health Care Workers and Their Families During and Following the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocol for a Cross-sectional Study , 2022, JMIR research protocols.

[32]  D. Gozal,et al.  Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding COVID-19 outbreak in Bangladesh: An online-based cross-sectional study , 2020, PloS one.

[33]  Seong Ho Park,et al.  What should medical students know about artificial intelligence in medicine? , 2019, Journal of educational evaluation for health professions.

[34]  L. Lancia,et al.  Ethical difficulties in healthcare: A comparison between physicians and nurses , 2018, Nursing ethics.

[35]  Jessica A. Chen,et al.  Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review , 2018, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[36]  C. V. D. van der Vleuten,et al.  The pattern of social media use and its association with academic performance among medical students , 2018, Medical teacher.

[37]  Bill Bynum,et al.  Lancet , 2015, The Lancet.