On the interpretation of the number attraction effect: Response time evidence.

[1]  N. Gage,et al.  I think you think I think... , 1968 .

[2]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[3]  Mary C. Potter,et al.  Rapid serial visual presentation (rsvp): a method for studying language processing , 2018 .

[4]  K. Forster,et al.  The psychological status of overgenerated sentences , 1985, Cognition.

[5]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[6]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[7]  David E. Kieras,et al.  New methods in reading comprehension research , 1986 .

[8]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[9]  K. Bock,et al.  Broken agreement , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Richard S. Kayne.  Romance Clitics, Verb Movement and PRO , 1991 .

[11]  K. Bock.  Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production , 1992 .

[12]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[13]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Meaning, sound and syntax in english number agreement , 1993 .

[14]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Constructing Subject-Verb Agreement in Speech: The Role of Semantic and Morphological Factors , 1995 .

[15]  J L Nicol.  Effects of clausal structure on subject-verb agreement errors , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[16]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  One or more labels on the bottles? Notional concord in Dutch and French , 1996 .

[17]  G. Waters,et al.  Processing resource capacity and the comprehension of garden path sentences , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Kathleen M. Eberhard,et al.  The Marked Effect of Number on Subject–Verb Agreement☆ , 1997 .

[19]  K. Forster,et al.  Subject-verb agreement processes in comprehension , 1997 .

[20]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. , 1997, Psychological review.

[21]  E. Gibson.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[22]  J. Nicol,et al.  Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production: is proximity concord syntactic or linear? , 1998, Cognition.

[23]  G. Vigliocco,et al.  When Sex and Syntax Go Hand in Hand: Gender Agreement in Language Production , 1999 .

[24]  K. Bock,et al.  The Ties That Bind: Creating Number Agreement in Speech , 1999 .

[25]  G Vigliocco,et al.  Syntactic Accuracy in Sentence Production: The Case of Gender Disagreement in Italian Language-Impaired and Unimpaired Speakers , 1999, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[26]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Representations and Processes in the Production of Pronouns: Some Perspectives from Dutch☆☆☆ , 1999 .

[27]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Agreement Processes in Sentence Comprehension , 1999 .

[28]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. , 1999, Psychological review.

[29]  P. Gordon,et al.  Memory interference during language processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  K. Bock,et al.  Some Attractions of Verb Agreement , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  When Sex Affects Syntax: Contextual Influences in Sentence Production , 2001 .

[32]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Object Attraction in Subject-Verb Agreement Construction , 2001 .

[33]  J Barker,et al.  Semantic Factors in the Production of Number Agreement , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[34]  Merrill F. Garrett,et al.  The Relation between Gender and Number Agreement Processing , 2002 .

[35]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Subject-verb agreement errors in French and English: The role of syntactic hierarchy , 2002 .

[36]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2002 .

[37]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  The Influence of Animacy on Relative Clause Processing , 2002 .

[38]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  M. MacDonald,et al.  Conflicting cues and competition in subject-verb agreement , 2003 .

[40]  Robert J Hartsuiker,et al.  Morphophonological influences on the construction of subject – verb agreement , 2004 .

[41]  Eric S Solomon,et al.  Semantic integration and syntactic planning in language production , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  P. Gordon,et al.  Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity , 2004 .

[43]  K. Bock,et al.  Producing number agreement: How pronouns equal verbs , 2004 .

[44]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Comparing categorization models. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[45]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. , 2004, Psychological review.

[46]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. , 2004, Psychological review.

[47]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  Normal and pathological development of subject–verb agreement in speech production: a study on French children , 2004, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[48]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses , 2005 .

[49]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Notional number agreement in English , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[50]  Robert M Nosofsky,et al.  Speeded classification in a probabilistic category structure: contrasting exemplar-retrieval, decision-boundary, and prototype models. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Making syntax of sense: number agreement in sentence production. , 2005, Psychological review.

[52]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[53]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush , 2006 .

[54]  Matthew J. Rambert,et al.  Number Agreement in British and American English: Disagreeing to Agree Collectively , 2006 .

[55]  Robert M Nosofsky,et al.  Speeded old-new recognition of multidimensional perceptual stimuli: modeling performance at the individual-participant and individual-item levels. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Agreement and movement: A syntactic analysis of attraction , 2006, Cognition.

[57]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  William Badecker,et al.  Morphology, agreement and working memory retrieval in sentence production : Evidence from gender and case in Slovak , 2007 .

[59]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[60]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[61]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[62]  Silvia P. Gennari,et al.  Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.