Correlation of the AOFAS Scores with a Generic Health Qualy Score in Foot and Ankle Surgery

Background: The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) is one scoring system used to assess and monitor the progress of patients after foot and ankle surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trend of the AOFAS score over a period of time and correlate it with the QUALY score, which is a valid and reliable scoring system. Methods: All patients undergoing surgery by one foot and ankle surgeon between January, 2001, and July, 2003, were reviewed. The preoperative AOFAS and QUALY and postoperative scores at 3, 6 and 12 months, and yearly were collected prospectively. Results: This study includes 204 operative procedures in 159 patients. The mean age of the patients was 51.9 (range 12 to 89) years. The AOFAS scores increased from a mean of 45.5 preoperatively to 76.5 at 3 months and reached a peak of 81.5 at 6 months and then started to decrease to 79.2 at 12 months. This fall, though seemingly marginal, was significant (p < 0. 01). This trend seems to be consistent for all the procedures. The 6-month AOFAS score was found to have a higher correlation with the final QUALY score (r 2 = 0.423) than the 12-month AOFAS score (r 2 = 0.326). Conclusions: The AOFAS score has low levels of correlation with the validated generic health QUALY score. Our study suggests that scores collected preoperatively, at 6 and 12 months after surgery, and annually there after may be best. The 3-month score may not be necessary. We recommend that a generic health score such as the QUALY score be used in conjunction with the AOFAS score to reflect outcome.

[1]  S. Pinney,et al.  A Meta-analysis of Outcome Rating Scales in Foot and Ankle Surgery: Is There a Valid, Reliable, and Responsive System? , 2004, Foot & ankle international.

[2]  L. Fleming,et al.  Evaluation of the Validity of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems by Correlation to the SF-36 , 2003, Foot & ankle international.

[3]  C. Nester,et al.  The Problem with Measuring Patient Perceptions of Outcome with Existing Outcome Measures in Foot and Ankle Surgery , 2003, Foot & ankle international.

[4]  G. Guyton Theoretical Limitations of the AOFAS Scoring Systems: An Analysis Using Monte Carlo Modeling , 2001, Foot & ankle international.

[5]  B. J. Cunningham,et al.  An Evaluation of the Use of Retrospectively Acquired Preoperative AOFAS Clinical Rating Scores to Assess Surgical Outcome after Elective Foot and Ankle Surgery , 2001, Foot & ankle international.

[6]  M. Nyska Principles of first metatarsal osteotomies. , 2001, Foot and ankle clinics.

[7]  K. Knahr,et al.  Scoring in forefoot surgery: a statistical evaluation of single variables and rating systems. , 1998, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[8]  J. Nunley,et al.  Clinical Rating Systems for the Ankle-Hindfoot, Midfoot, Hallux, and Lesser Toes , 1994, Foot & ankle international.

[9]  A. Carr,et al.  Outcome measures in orthopaedics , 1993 .

[10]  K. Roach,et al.  The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  P. Kind,et al.  A scale of valuations of states of illness: is there a social consensus? , 1978, International journal of epidemiology.