Biomechanical effects of continuous loop running in comparison to discontinuous runway running on locomotion and running shoe characterization

Abstract Running and running shoe biomechanics are usually measured in laboratory settings, capturing discontinuous running trials. Continuous running measured outdoors doesn’t allow comprehensive measurement equipment due to limited technology. This research compared biomechanical effects of continuous loop and discontinuous runway running on locomotion and running shoe characterisation. Twenty-two runners performed eight trials in three shoe conditions in a runway and a loop laboratory setting, while capturing ground reaction forces and lower limb kinematics. Running mode and shoe variable magnitudes and intra-participant variability, means were compared for main and interaction effects (p < 0.05) by a 2 × 3 within-participants repeated measures analysis of variance, and effect size estimation. Kinetic and kinematic variables indicated biomechanical effects induced by running mode. Continuous loop running significantly decreased ground contact time (241.31–234.47 ms), and braking force (0.37–0.35 bw). It showed a significantly flatter and inverted foot-strike at touchdown by reducing sagittal shoe ground angle (20.27–16.69°), and increasing ankle inversion angle (5.50–6.67°). Continuous loop running significantly increased intra-participant variability in ankle dorsiflexion (9.49–12.78) and maximal eversion angle (12.70–17.36). Kinetic and kinematics indicated biomechanical effects induced by running shoes, shoe classification was similar between modes. Running mode influences biomechanics, whilst shoe classification remains similar. Anterior-posterior braking force is overestimated in discontinuous runway running, combined with increased variability suggesting an inconsistent foot-strike. Variability at the ankle joint was seen to increase during continuous loop running, indicating a more rigid ankle complex during discontinuous runway running. Our findings suggest that continuous loop running should be used when precise absolute variable magnitudes are required while runway running tests appear sufficient for general comparative shoe evaluation.

[1]  D. Stefanyshyn,et al.  The Effects of Wedged Footwear on Lower Limb Frontal Plane Biomechanics During Running , 2013, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[2]  T. Rantalainen,et al.  Running in a minimalist and lightweight shoe is not the same as running barefoot: a biomechanical study , 2013, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[3]  Roy T H Cheung,et al.  Effects of footwear midsole thickness on running biomechanics , 2018, Journal of sports sciences.

[4]  J. Hamill,et al.  Running injury and stride time variability over a prolonged run. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[5]  E. Frederick,et al.  Midsole thickness affects running patterns in habitual rearfoot strikers during a sustained run. , 2014, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[6]  Jason Tak-Man Cheung,et al.  Segmented midsole hardness in the midfoot to forefoot region of running shoes alters subjective perception and biomechanics during heel-toe running revealing potential to enhance footwear , 2015 .

[7]  D Schmidtbleicher,et al.  Kinematics and Electromyography of Lower Limb Muscles in Overground and Treadmill Running , 1998, International journal of sports medicine.

[8]  Thomas L. Milani,et al.  VARIABILITY OF STRIDE FREQUENCY AND PRONATION VELOCITY DURING A 16 DAY RELAY-RUN AROUND GERMANY – A CASE STUDY , 2009 .

[9]  Corina Nüesch,et al.  Measuring joint kinematics of treadmill walking and running: Comparison between an inertial sensor based system and a camera-based system. , 2017, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Jasper Reenalda,et al.  Continuous three dimensional analysis of running mechanics during a marathon by means of inertial magnetic measurement units to objectify changes in running mechanics. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  Ground reaction forces in distance running. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Kurt Manal,et al.  A comparison of three-dimensional lower extremity kinematics during running between excessive pronators and normals. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  J. Richards,et al.  Three-dimensional kinematic comparison of treadmill and overground running , 2013, Sports biomechanics.

[14]  P. Samozino,et al.  Effect of midsole geometry on foot-strike pattern and running kinematics , 2013 .

[15]  D. Stefanyshyn,et al.  Effect of torsional stiffness on biomechanical variables of the lower extremity during running , 2017 .

[16]  Isabel C N Sacco,et al.  Biomechanical variables and perception of comfort in running shoes with different cushioning technologies. , 2015, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[17]  A Leardini,et al.  Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[18]  Darren J. Stefanyshyn,et al.  Increasing Running Shoe Traction can Enhance Performance , 2014 .

[19]  D. Kerrigan,et al.  The Effect of Running Shoes on Lower Extremity Joint Torques , 2009, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[20]  T. Sterzing,et al.  Systematically modified crash-pad reduces impact shock in running shoes , 2010 .

[21]  Laurent Malisoux,et al.  Influence of midsole hardness of standard cushioned shoes on running-related injury risk , 2013, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[22]  Arnel Aguinaldo,et al.  Impact Loading in Running Shoes with Cushioning Column Systems , 2003 .

[23]  K. Newell,et al.  Long range correlations in the stride interval of running. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[24]  Thomas L. Milani,et al.  The position of medial dual density midsole elements in running shoes does not influence biomechanical variables , 2011 .

[25]  Who Participates in Running Events? Socio-Demographic Characteristics, Psychosocial Factors and Barriers as Correlates of Non-Participation—A Pilot Study in Belgium , 2017, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[26]  Thomas D. O'Brien,et al.  Biomechanical locomotion adaptations on uneven surfaces can be simulated with a randomly deforming shoe midsole , 2017 .

[27]  B M Nigg,et al.  The influence of running velocity and midsole hardness on external impact forces in heel-toe running. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  Joseph Hamill,et al.  Tibial rotation in running: Does rearfoot adduction matter? , 2017, Gait & posture.

[29]  Brigit De Wit,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of the stance phase during barefoot and shod running. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  G K Cole,et al.  Application of the joint coordinate system to three-dimensional joint attitude and movement representation: a standardization proposal. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[31]  A. Schache,et al.  A comparison of overground and treadmill running for measuring the three-dimensional kinematics of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[32]  A. J. van den Bogert,et al.  Tibiocalcaneal kinematics of barefoot versus shod running. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  Thomas L. Milani,et al.  Methodological issues associated with the mean value of repeated laboratory running measurements , 2012 .

[34]  M Mochimaru,et al.  Comparison of 3 Methods for Computing Loading Rate during Running , 2016, International Journal of Sports Medicine.

[35]  Thorsten Sterzing,et al.  Influence of rearfoot and forefoot midsole hardness on biomechanical and perception variables during heel-toe running , 2013 .

[36]  Jonathan Kenneth Sinclair,et al.  The influence of barefoot and barefoot-inspired footwear on the kinetics and kinematics of running in comparison to conventional running shoes , 2013 .

[37]  K. Manal,et al.  Comparison of surface mounted markers and attachment methods in estimating tibial rotations during walking: an in vivo study. , 2000, Gait & posture.

[38]  D. Kerrigan,et al.  A kinematics and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill running. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[39]  Gerhard Tröster,et al.  Monitoring Kinematic Changes With Fatigue in Running Using Body-Worn Sensors , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[40]  Jonathan Kenneth Sinclair,et al.  The Influence of Energy Boost and Springblade Footwear on the Kinetics and Kinematics of Running , 2016 .

[41]  S. Hasan,et al.  Relationship between vertical ground reaction force and speed during walking, slow jogging, and running. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[42]  P J McNair,et al.  Kinematic and kinetic parameters associated with running in different shoes. , 1994, British journal of sports medicine.

[43]  Thorsten Sterzing,et al.  Running shoe crash-pad design alters shoe touchdown angles and ankle stability parameters during heel–toe running , 2015 .

[44]  Edward C Frederick,et al.  Relationship between running speed and initial foot contact patterns. , 2014, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[45]  Edward C. Frederick,et al.  Initial foot contact and related kinematics affect impact loading rate in running , 2017, Journal of sports sciences.