Automated Hierarchy Evaluation System of Large Vessel Occlusion in Acute Ischemia Stroke

Background The detection of large vessel occlusion (LVO) plays a critical role in the diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Identifying LVO in the pre-hospital setting or early stage of hospitalization would increase the patients’ chance of receiving appropriate reperfusion therapy and thereby improve neurological recovery. Methods To enable rapid identification of LVO, we established an automated evaluation system based on all recorded AIS patients in Hong Kong Hospital Authority’s hospitals in 2016. The 300 study samples were randomly selected based on a disproportionate sampling plan within the integrated electronic health record system, and then separated into a group of 200 patients for model training, and another group of 100 patients for model performance evaluation. The evaluation system contained three hierarchical models based on patients’ demographic data, clinical data and non-contrast CT (NCCT) scans. The first two levels of modeling utilized structured demographic and clinical data, while the third level involved additional NCCT imaging features obtained from deep learning model. All three levels’ modeling adopted multiple machine learning techniques, including logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine (SVM), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGboost). The optimal cut-off for the likelihood of LVO was determined by the maximal Youden index based on 10-fold cross-validation. Comparisons of performance on the testing group were made between these techniques. Results Among the 300 patients, there were 160 women and 140 men aged from 27 to 104 years (mean 76.0 with standard deviation 13.4). LVO was present in 130 (43.3%) patients. Together with clinical and imaging features, the XGBoost model at the third level of evaluation achieved the best model performance on testing group. The Youden index, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and area under the curve (AUC) were 0.638, 0.800, 0.953, 0.684, 0.804, and 0.847, respectively. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study combining both structured clinical data with non-structured NCCT imaging data for the diagnosis of LVO in the acute setting, with superior performance compared to previously reported approaches. Our system is capable of automatically providing preliminary evaluations at different pre-hospital stages for potential AIS patients.

[1]  Bram van Ginneken,et al.  A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis , 2017, Medical Image Anal..

[2]  Adnan H Siddiqui,et al.  Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis. , 2016, JAMA.

[3]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Burden of large vessel occlusion stroke and the service gap of thrombectomy: A population-based study using a territory-wide public hospital system registry , 2020, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[4]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[5]  R. Nogueira,et al.  Response by Lima et al to Letter Regarding Article, "Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination: A Simple and Accurate Prehospital Scale to Detect Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes". , 2016, Stroke.

[6]  C. Levi,et al.  Validation of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale-8 to Detect Large Vessel Occlusion in Ischemic Stroke. , 2017, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[7]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  FSL , 2012, NeuroImage.

[8]  Ninon Burgos,et al.  New advances in the Clinica software platform for clinical neuroimaging studies , 2019 .

[9]  E. López‐Cancio,et al.  Design and Validation of a Prehospital Stroke Scale to Predict Large Arterial Occlusion: The Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation Scale , 2014, Stroke.

[10]  G. Andersen,et al.  Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity Scale to Predict Large Artery Occlusion: Design and Comparison With Other Scales , 2016, Stroke.

[11]  Christopher Joseph Pal,et al.  Brain tumor segmentation with Deep Neural Networks , 2015, Medical Image Anal..

[12]  D. Liebeskind,et al.  Imaging of Occlusive Thrombi in Acute Ischemic Stroke , 2015, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[13]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[14]  J. Broderick,et al.  Design and Validation of a Prehospital Scale to Predict Stroke Severity: Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Severity Scale , 2015, Stroke.

[15]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks , 2017, Nature.

[16]  J. Saver Time Is Brain—Quantified , 2006, Stroke.

[17]  J. Friedman Stochastic gradient boosting , 2002 .

[18]  Eric E. Smith,et al.  Accuracy of Prediction Instruments for Diagnosing Large Vessel Occlusion in Individuals With Suspected Stroke: A Systematic Review for the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke , 2018, Stroke.

[19]  Gary A. Ford,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Stroke Referrals From Primary Care, Emergency Room Physicians, and Ambulance Staff Using the Face Arm Speech Test , 2003, Stroke.

[20]  M. Froehler,et al.  The CT‐Defined Hyperdense Arterial Sign as a Marker for Acute Intracerebral Large Vessel Occlusion , 2018, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[21]  M. Lou,et al.  Novel Prehospital Prediction Model of Large Vessel Occlusion Using Artificial Neural Network , 2018, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[22]  W. Youden,et al.  Index for rating diagnostic tests , 1950, Cancer.

[23]  T. Neumann-Haefelin,et al.  A Simple 3-Item Stroke Scale: Comparison With the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and Prediction of Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion , 2005, Stroke.

[24]  M. Chen,et al.  Transfer Delay Is a Major Factor Limiting the Use of Intra-Arterial Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke , 2011, Stroke.

[25]  J. Gornbein,et al.  Ischemic Strokes Due to Large-Vessel Occlusions Contribute Disproportionately to Stroke-Related Dependence and Death: A Review , 2017, Front. Neurol..

[26]  O. Adeoye,et al.  Letter by Adeoye et al Regarding Article, "Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity Scale to Predict Large Artery Occlusion: Design and Comparison With Other Scales". , 2016, Stroke.

[27]  Deniz Erdogmus,et al.  Tversky Loss Function for Image Segmentation Using 3D Fully Convolutional Deep Networks , 2017, MLMI@MICCAI.

[28]  Luca Maria Gambardella,et al.  Mitosis Detection in Breast Cancer Histology Images with Deep Neural Networks , 2013, MICCAI.

[29]  Abhinav Gupta,et al.  Training Region-Based Object Detectors with Online Hard Example Mining , 2016, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[30]  Nicholas L. Crookston,et al.  yaImpute: An R Package for kNN Imputation , 2008 .

[31]  Michael H. Lev,et al.  Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination: A Simple and Accurate Prehospital Scale to Detect Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes , 2016, Stroke.

[32]  G. Duckwiler,et al.  A Brief Prehospital Stroke Severity Scale Identifies Ischemic Stroke Patients Harboring Persisting Large Arterial Occlusions , 2008, Stroke.

[33]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[34]  Tianqi Chen,et al.  XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , 2016, KDD.

[35]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[36]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[37]  A. Tsang,et al.  Overview of endovascular thrombectomy accessibility gap for acute ischemic stroke in Asia: A multi-national survey , 2020, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[38]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.