Regulatory focus and preference reversal between hedonic and utilitarian consumption

This article explores the impact of consumers' regulatory goals on their relative focus on hedonic (versus utilitarian) benefits of products. Drawing from extant literature, we argue that promotion-focused consumers will exhibit more favorable attitude towards a product when its hedonic benefits are highlighted in comparison to its utilitarian benefits. Prevention-focused consumers on the other hand will exhibit more favorable attitude towards a product when its utilitarian benefits are highlighted in comparison to its hedonic benefits. We further argue that this effect is moderated by contextual factors, such as evaluation mode. In addition, we argue that the posited difference only holds when the hedonic and utilitarian products are evaluated individually. When the two products are evaluated jointly, both promotion and prevention-focused individuals will exhibit more favorable attitude towards the hedonic product. Two studies were conducted to test the hypotheses and findings supported our predictions. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  J. Joško Brakus,et al.  Adoption of New and Really New Products: The Effects of Self-Regulation Systems and Risk Salience , 2007 .

[2]  R. Oliver,et al.  Assessing the Dimensionality and Structure of the Consumption Experience: Evaluation, Feeling, and Satisfaction , 1993 .

[3]  Mahesh Gopinath,et al.  The Role of Regulatory Focus in the Experience and Self-Control of Desire for Temptations , 2006 .

[4]  Jongwon Park,et al.  Effects of Parent-Extension Similarity and Self Regulatory Focus on Evaluations of Brand Extensions , 2006 .

[5]  Kevin E. Voss,et al.  Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude , 2003 .

[6]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  General Evaluability Theory , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[7]  E. Higgins,et al.  Transfer of value from fit. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Jing Wang,et al.  The Role of Regulatory Focus in Preference Construction , 2006 .

[9]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Options: A Review and Theoretical Analysis , 1999 .

[10]  J. J. F. Sherry.  A Sociocultural Analysis of a Midwestern American Flea Market , 1990 .

[11]  William R. Darden,et al.  Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value , 1994 .

[12]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives , 1996 .

[13]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Form versus Function: How the Intensities of Specific Emotions Evoked in Functional versus Hedonic Trade-Offs Mediate Product Preferences , 2007 .

[14]  I. Simonson,et al.  Earning the Right to Indulge: Effort as a Determinant of Customer Preferences toward Frequency Program Rewards , 2002 .

[15]  Michel Tuan Pham,et al.  Ideals and Oughts and the Reliance of Affect Versus Substance in Persuasion , 2004 .

[16]  M. Strahilevitz,et al.  Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You are Trying to Sell , 1998 .

[17]  E. Okada.  Justification Effects on Consumer Choice of Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods , 2005 .

[18]  R. Dhar,et al.  Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods , 2000 .

[19]  R. Batra,et al.  Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes , 1991 .

[20]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  Understanding Regulatory Fit , 2006 .

[21]  S. Czellár,et al.  The Importance of a General Measure of Brand Engagement on Market Behavior: Development and Validation of a Scale , 2009 .

[22]  Arjun Chaudhuri,et al.  A study of emotion and reason in products and services , 2002 .

[23]  S. Kopp,et al.  Emotion regulation consumption: When feeling better is the aim , 2011 .

[24]  E. Higgins.  Beyond pleasure and pain. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[25]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  How Regulatory Fit Affects Value in Consumer Choices and Opinions , 2006 .