Determinants of Patent Citations in Biotechnology: An Analysis of Patent Influence Across the Industrial and Organizational Boundaries

The present paper extends the literature investigating key drivers leading certain patents to exert a stronger influence on the subsequent technological developments (inventions) than other ones. We investigated six key determinants, as (i) the use of scientific knowledge, (ii) the breadth of the technological base, (iii) the existence of collaboration in patent development, (iv) the number of claims, (v) the scope, and (vi) the novelty, and how the effect of these determinants varies when patent influence—as measured by the number of forward citations the patent received—is distinguished as within and across the industrial and organizational boundaries. We conducted an empirical analysis on a sample of 5671 patents granted to 293 US biotechnology firms from 1976 to 2003. Results reveal that the contribution of the determinants to patent influence differs across the domains that are identified by the industrial and organizational boundaries. Findings, for example, show that the use of scientific knowledge negatively affects patent influence outside the biotechnology industry, while it positively contributes to make a patent more relevant for the assignee's subsequent technological developments. In addition, the broader the scope of a patent the higher the number of citations the patent receives from subsequent non-biotechnology patents. This relationship is inverted U-shaped when considering the influence of a patent on inventions granted to other organizations than the patent's assignee. Finally, the novelty of a patent is inverted-U related with the influence the patent exerts on the subsequent inventions granted across the industrial and organizational boundaries.

[1]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Science as a Map in Technological Search , 2000 .

[2]  G. Lilien,et al.  The timing of competitive market entry: an exploratory study of new industrial products , 1990 .

[3]  Markus Reitzig,et al.  Value Appropriation as an Organizational Capability: The Case of Ip Protection Through Patents , 2009 .

[4]  Jean O. Lanjouw,et al.  How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data , 1996 .

[5]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  OECD Biotechnology Statistics 2009 , 2006 .

[6]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation , 2006 .

[7]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano science and technology , 2007 .

[8]  Karen R. Polenske,et al.  The Economic Geography of Innovation: Measuring the geography of innovation: a literature review , 2007 .

[9]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[10]  Dovev Lavie.  Alliance Portfolios and Firm Performance: A Study of Value Creation and Appropriation in the U.S. Software Industry , 2007 .

[11]  Ariel Pakes,et al.  Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During Thepost-1950 Period , 1985 .

[12]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  The nanotech vs . the biotech revolution : sources of productivity in incumbent firm research , 2007 .

[13]  Nei Pereira,et al.  On the assignment of biopharmaceutical patents , 2013 .

[14]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[15]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  Old technology meets new technology: complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation , 2008 .

[16]  Paul Nightingale,et al.  The myth of the biotech revolution: An assessment of technological, clinical and organisational change , 2007 .

[17]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[18]  S. Scotchmer,et al.  Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law , 1991 .

[19]  Fernando F. Suarez,et al.  The Role of Environmental Dynamics in Building a First Mover Advantage Theory , 2007 .

[20]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[21]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Applicant and Examiner Citations in US Patents: An Overview and Analysis , 2008 .

[22]  Joel Waldfogel,et al.  Close to You? Bias and Precision in Patent-Based Measures of Technological Proximity , 2007 .

[23]  Barry L. Bayus,et al.  The Market Evolution and Sales Takeoff of Product Innovations , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Shann-Bin Chang,et al.  Using patent analysis to establish technological position: Two different strategic approaches , 2012 .

[25]  Frank T. Rothaermel,et al.  Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[26]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities , 2007 .

[27]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[28]  A. Petruzzelli,et al.  In Search of Alliance-Level Relational Capabilities: Balancing Innovation Value Creation and Appropriability in R&D Alliances , 2011 .

[29]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .

[30]  C. Freeman,et al.  The Economics of Industrial Innovation - 3rd Edition , 1997 .

[31]  J. Davidson Frame,et al.  Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data , 1994 .

[32]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Patents, citations & innovations: A window on the knowledge economy , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[33]  R. Schmalensee.  Product Differentiation Advantages of Pioneering Brands , 1980 .

[34]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[35]  Jasjit Singh.  Distributed R&D, Cross-Regional Knowledge Integration and Quality of Innovative Output , 2006 .

[36]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Preface to the Japanese Translation of An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change , 2007 .

[37]  Suzanne Scotchmer,et al.  Patent Breadth, Patent Life, and the Pace of Technological Progress , 1998 .

[38]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[39]  M. Reitzig.  Improving patent valuations for management purposes--validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales , 2004 .

[40]  Gregory S. Carpenter,et al.  Consumer Preference Formation and Pioneering Advantage , 1989 .

[41]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[42]  R. Nelson,et al.  On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope , 1990 .

[43]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[44]  Yongtae Park,et al.  On the Measurement of Patent Stock as Knowledge Indicators , 2006 .

[45]  D. Harhoff,et al.  The Value of European Patents , 2008 .

[46]  Nikolaus Thumm.  Europe's construction of a patent system for biotechnological inventions:: An assessment of industry views , 2002 .

[47]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  THE INSTITUTIONAL SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE AND THE VALUE OF ACADEMIC PATENTS , 2007 .

[48]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Performance Effects of (In)Direct Industry Science Links , 2008 .

[49]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[50]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  A market entry timing model for new techniques , 1986 .

[51]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[52]  Seung Geun Yeo,et al.  Aging , 2013, Korean journal of audiology.

[53]  J. Hagedoorn.  Sharing intellectual property rights - an exploratory study of joint patenting amongst companies. , 2003 .

[54]  F. Narin,et al.  Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents , 1991 .

[55]  S. Kalish,et al.  A MARKET ENTRY TIMING MODEL FOR NEW TECHNOLOGIES * , 2004 .

[56]  J. Marshall.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[57]  M. Tushman,et al.  On the Organizational Determinants of Technological Change: Towards a Sociology of Technological Evolution , 1992 .

[58]  O’D,et al.  Patent Breadth , Patent Life , and the Pace of Technological Progress , 1998 .

[59]  D. Archibugi,et al.  The globalisation of technology: a new taxonomy , 1995 .

[60]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 2004 .

[61]  G. Pisano.  The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[62]  Yangrae Cho,et al.  A stochastic patent citation analysis approach to assessing future technological impacts , 2012 .

[63]  Scott Shane,et al.  Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[64]  Jonathan D. Linton,et al.  The patent paradox – New insights through decision support using compound options , 2012 .

[65]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[66]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[67]  Marcus Wagner,et al.  The effect of alliances on innovation patterns: an analysis of the biotechnology industry , 2013 .

[68]  Kenneth W. Koput,et al.  A Chaotic Model of Innovative Search: Some Answers, Many Questions , 1997 .

[69]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[70]  M. Gittelman,et al.  A Note on the Value of Patents as Indicators of Innovation: Implications for Management Research , 2008 .

[71]  CattaniGino.  Preadaptation, Firm Heterogeneity, and Technological Performance , 2005 .

[72]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[73]  Daniele Rotolo,et al.  The impact of old technologies on innovation: the case of the US biotechnology industry , 2012, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[74]  Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsreihe,et al.  R & D cooperation and innovation activities of firms : Evidence for the German manufacturing industry , 2002 .

[75]  John Hagedoorn,et al.  Joint patenting amongst companies - exploring the effects of inter-firm R&D partnering and experience , 2003 .

[76]  James Bessen.  The Value of U.S. Patents by Owner and Patent Characteristics , 2006 .

[77]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[78]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis , 2006 .

[79]  L. Fleming.  Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search Lee Fleming , 2001 .

[80]  R. Reed,et al.  Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 1990 .

[81]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .

[82]  Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli,et al.  The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university-industry collaborations: A joint-patent analysis , 2011 .

[83]  Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist,et al.  Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin , 2006 .

[84]  Jennifer F. Reinganum.  Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly , 1982 .

[85]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[86]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[87]  小山 和伸.  Academy of Management Review : 抄録雑誌の概要 , 1987 .

[88]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Do alliances promote knowledge flows , 2006 .

[89]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development , 2004 .

[90]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .

[91]  B. Silverman,et al.  R&D, ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF CORPORATE TECHNOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE , 2004 .

[92]  Michelle Gittelman,et al.  Does Geography Matter for Science-Based Firms? Epistemic Communities and the Geography of Research and Patenting in Biotechnology , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[93]  W. Bennis,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[94]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[95]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[96]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition , 2001 .

[97]  J. Lerner.  The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[98]  Gino Cattani,et al.  Preadaptation, Firm Heterogeneity, and Technological Performance: A Study on the Evolution of Fiber Optics, 1970–1995 , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[99]  Ryan Lampe.  Strategic Citation , 2010, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[100]  Daniele Rotolo,et al.  Organizational factors and technological features in the development of green innovations: Evidence from patent analysis , 2011 .

[101]  Citations , 2002 .