Normative models of enhancer function

In prokaryotes, thermodynamic models of gene regulation provide a highly quantitative mapping from promoter sequences to gene expression levels that is compatible with in vivo and in vitro bio-physical measurements. Such concordance has not been achieved for models of enhancer function in eukaryotes. In equilibrium models, it is difficult to reconcile the reported short transcription factor (TF) residence times on the DNA with the high specificity of regulation. In non-equilibrium models, progress is difficult due to an explosion in the number of parameters. Here, we navigate this complexity by looking for minimal non-equilibrium enhancer models that yield desired regulatory phenotypes: low TF residence time, high specificity and tunable cooperativity. We find that a single extra parameter, interpretable as the “linking rate” by which bound TFs interact with Mediator components, enables our models to escape equilibrium bounds and access optimal regulatory phenotypes, while remaining consistent with the reported phenomenology and simple enough to be inferred from upcoming experiments. We further find that high specificity in non-equilibrium models is in a tradeoff with gene expression noise, predicting bursty dynamics — an experimentally-observed hallmark of eukaryotic transcription. By drastically reducing the vast parameter space to a much smaller subspace that optimally realizes biological function prior to inference from data, our normative approach holds promise for mathematical models in systems biology.

[1]  W. Bialek,et al.  Action at a distance in transcriptional regulation , 2019, 1912.08579.

[2]  T. Lenstra,et al.  Live‐cell imaging reveals the interplay between transcription factors, nucleosomes, and bursting , 2019, The EMBO journal.

[3]  Chao Wu,et al.  Hit and run versus long-term activation of PARP-1 by its different domains fine-tunes nuclear processes , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Mariela D. Petkova,et al.  Optimal Decoding of Cellular Identities in a Genetic Network , 2016, Cell.

[5]  Sandy L. Klemm,et al.  Chromatin accessibility and the regulatory epigenome , 2019, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[6]  Shawn C. Little,et al.  Diverse Spatial Expression Patterns Emerge from Unified Kinetics of Transcriptional Bursting , 2018, Cell.

[7]  J. Gunawardena,et al.  Dissecting the sharp response of a canonical developmental enhancer reveals multiple sources of cooperativity , 2018, bioRxiv.

[8]  Daniel Jones,et al.  Measuring cis-regulatory energetics in living cells using allelic manifolds , 2018, bioRxiv.

[9]  Daniel S. Day,et al.  Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control , 2018, Science.

[10]  Charles H. Li,et al.  Mediator and RNA polymerase II clusters associate in transcription-dependent condensates , 2018, Science.

[11]  Thomas Gregor,et al.  Dynamic interplay between enhancer-promoter topology and gene activity , 2018, Nature Genetics.

[12]  Felix Naef,et al.  Modulation of transcriptional burst frequency by histone acetylation , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  J. Kinney,et al.  A Systematic and Scalable Approach for Dissecting the Molecular Mechanisms of Transcriptional Regulation in Bacteria , 2018 .

[14]  Michael J. Sweredoski,et al.  Systematic approach for dissecting the molecular mechanisms of transcriptional regulation in bacteria , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Keji Zhao,et al.  CTCF-Mediated Enhancer-Promoter Interaction Is a Critical Regulator of Cell-to-Cell Variation of Gene Expression. , 2017, Molecular cell.

[16]  R. Young,et al.  A Phase Separation Model for Transcriptional Control , 2017, Cell.

[17]  G. Tkačik,et al.  Evolution of new regulatory functions on biophysically realistic fitness landscapes , 2016, Nature Communications.

[18]  Jeremy Gunawardena,et al.  Information Integration and Energy Expenditure in Gene Regulation , 2016, Cell.

[19]  A. Raj,et al.  Enhancer Regulation of Transcriptional Bursting Parameters Revealed by Forced Chromatin Looping. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[20]  Gašper Tkačik,et al.  Intrinsic limits to gene regulation by global crosstalk , 2015, Nature Communications.

[21]  Felix Naef,et al.  Structure of silent transcription intervals and noise characteristics of mammalian genes , 2015, Molecular systems biology.

[22]  Gašper Tkačik,et al.  Stochastic Proofreading Mechanism Alleviates Crosstalk in Transcriptional Regulation. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[23]  D. Zheng,et al.  Pioneer factors govern super-enhancer dynamics in stem cell plasticity and lineage choice , 2015, Nature.

[24]  William Bialek,et al.  Information processing in living systems , 2014, 1412.8752.

[25]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Promoter architecture dictates cell-to-cell variability in gene expression , 2014, Science.

[26]  J. McNally,et al.  Single molecule analysis of transcription factor binding at transcription sites in live cells , 2014, Nature Communications.

[27]  Brian Munsky,et al.  Transcription Factors Modulate c-Fos Transcriptional Bursts , 2014, Cell reports.

[28]  A. Stark,et al.  Transcriptional enhancers: from properties to genome-wide predictions , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[29]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  Single-Molecule Dynamics of Enhanceosome Assembly in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2014, Cell.

[30]  W. Austin Elam,et al.  Physical Biology of the Cell , 2014, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[31]  J. Elf,et al.  Direct measurement of transcription factor dissociation excludes a simple operator occupancy model for gene regulation , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[32]  F. Tostevin,et al.  The Berg-Purcell limit revisited. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[33]  Gašper Tkačik,et al.  Noise and information transmission in promoters with multiple internal States. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[34]  Felix Naef,et al.  Stimulus-induced modulation of transcriptional bursting in a single mammalian gene , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  D. Larson,et al.  Direct observation of frequency modulated transcription in single cells using light activation , 2013, eLife.

[36]  J. Svejstrup,et al.  Mechanistic Interpretation of Promoter-Proximal Peaks and RNAPII Density Maps , 2013, Cell.

[37]  A. Coulon,et al.  Eukaryotic transcriptional dynamics: from single molecules to cell populations , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[38]  X. Xie,et al.  Single Molecule Imaging of Transcription Factor Binding to DNA in Live Mammalian Cells , 2013, Nature Methods.

[39]  Hernan G. Garcia,et al.  Whither Physical Biology , 2012 .

[40]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Operator sequence alters gene expression independently of transcription factor occupancy in bacteria. , 2012, Cell reports.

[41]  J. Changeux Allostery and the Monod-Wyman-Changeux model after 50 years. , 2012, Annual review of biophysics.

[42]  Andrew Mugler,et al.  Analytic methods for modeling stochastic regulatory networks. , 2010, Methods in molecular biology.

[43]  M. Biggin Animal transcription networks as highly connected, quantitative continua. , 2011, Developmental cell.

[44]  Nacho Molina,et al.  Mammalian Genes Are Transcribed with Widely Different Bursting Kinetics , 2011, Science.

[45]  Aleksandra M Walczak,et al.  Information transmission in genetic regulatory networks: a review , 2011, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[46]  J. Kinney,et al.  Using deep sequencing to characterize the biophysical mechanism of a transcriptional regulatory sequence , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  W. Bialek,et al.  Optimizing information flow in small genetic networks. II. Feed-forward interactions. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[48]  L. Mirny,et al.  Nucleosome-mediated cooperativity between transcription factors , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  L. Mirny,et al.  Different gene regulation strategies revealed by analysis of binding motifs. , 2009, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[50]  E. Siggia,et al.  Analysis of Combinatorial cis-Regulation in Synthetic and Genomic Promoters , 2008, Nature.

[51]  D. Larson,et al.  Single-RNA counting reveals alternative modes of gene expression in yeast , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[52]  Jané Kondev,et al.  Transcriptional control of noise in gene expression , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  Glenn Vinnicombe,et al.  Noise in Gene Regulatory Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[54]  W. Bialek,et al.  The Role of Input Noise in Transcriptional Regulation , 2006, PloS one.

[55]  Daniel T Gillespie,et al.  Stochastic simulation of chemical kinetics. , 2007, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[56]  Terence Hwa,et al.  Combinatorial transcriptional control of the lactose operon of Escherichia coli , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  K. Struhl Transcriptional noise and the fidelity of initiation by RNA polymerase II , 2007, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[58]  S. Quake,et al.  A Systems Approach to Measuring the Binding Energy Landscapes of Transcription Factors , 2007, Science.

[59]  David N Arnosti,et al.  Transcriptional enhancers: Intelligent enhanceosomes or flexible billboards? , 2005, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[60]  Terence Hwa,et al.  Transcriptional regulation by the numbers: models. , 2005, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[61]  Hernan G. Garcia,et al.  Transcriptional Regulation by the Numbers 2: Applications , 2004, q-bio/0412011.

[62]  W. Bialek,et al.  Physical limits to biochemical signaling. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  J. Paulsson Summing up the noise in gene networks , 2004, Nature.

[64]  P N Goodfellow,et al.  A Genetic Switch: Gene Control and Phage λ , 1987 .

[65]  P. V. von Hippel,et al.  Selection of DNA binding sites by regulatory proteins. Statistical-mechanical theory and application to operators and promoters. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[66]  M. Ptashne A genetic switch : gene control and phage λ [i.e. lambda] , 1987 .

[67]  Mark Ptashne,et al.  A Genetic Switch: Gene Control and Phage Lambda , 1986 .

[68]  H. Berg,et al.  Physics of chemoreception. , 1977, Biophysical journal.

[69]  J. Hopfield Kinetic proofreading: a new mechanism for reducing errors in biosynthetic processes requiring high specificity. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  A. Tustin Automatic Control , 1951, Nature.