The mechanism and kinetics of void formation and growth in particulate filled PE composites

Volume strain measurements were carried out on PE/CaCO3 composites prepared with three different matrix polymers, containing various amounts of filler. The analysis of the debonding process and the various stages of void forma- tion proved that the model developed for the prediction of the initiation of debonding is valid also for the studied PE/CaCO3 composites. Debonding stress is determined by the strength of interfacial adhesion, particle size and the stiffness of the matrix. In thermoplastic matrices usually two competitive processes take place: debonding and the plastic deformation of the polymer. The relative magnitude of the two processes strongly influences the number and size of the voids formed. Because of this competition and due to the wide particle size distribution of commercial fillers, only a certain fraction of the particles initiate the formation of voids. The number of voids formed is inversely proportional to the stiffness of the matrix polymer. In stiff matrices almost the entire amount of filler separates from the matrix under the effect of external load, while less than 30% debond in a PE which has an initial modulus of 0.4 GPa. Further decrease of matrix stiffness may lead to the complete absence of debonding and the composite would deform exclusively by shear yielding. Voids initiated by debonding grow during the further deformation of the composite. The size of the voids also depends on the modulus of the matrix. The rate of volume increase considerably exceeds the value predicted for cross-linked rubbers. At the same defor- mation and filler content the number of voids is smaller and their size is larger in soft matrices than in polymers with larger inherent modulus.

[1]  Mary C. Boyce,et al.  Three-dimensional large-strain tensile deformation of neat and calcium carbonate-filled high-density polyethylene , 2005 .

[2]  A. Argon,et al.  Role of interfacial adhesion strength on toughening polypropylene with rigid particles , 2004 .

[3]  A. Lazzeri,et al.  Volume Strain Measurements on CaCO3/Polypropylene Particulate Composites: the Effect of Particle Size , 2004 .

[4]  S. M. Berezina,et al.  The effect of morphology of ternary-phase polypropylene/glass bead/ethylene-propylene rubber composites on the toughness and brittle-ductile transition , 2002 .

[5]  C. Tang,et al.  Tensile properties and damage behaviors of glass-bead-filled modified polyphenylene oxide under large strain , 2001 .

[6]  G. Kim,et al.  FEG–ESEM investigation of micromechanical deformation processes in ultrafine monospherical SiO2 particle-filled polymer composites , 2001 .

[7]  W. Hale,et al.  A diffusion model for water vapor transmission through microporous polyethylene/CaCo3 films , 2001 .

[8]  G. Michler,et al.  Aggregation, fracture initiation, and strength of PP/CaCO3 composites , 1999 .

[9]  E. Fekete,et al.  Adhesion and Surface Modification , 1999 .

[10]  E. Fekete,et al.  Aggregation Tendency of Particulate Fillers: Determination and Consequences , 1998, Engineering Plastics.

[11]  G. Michler,et al.  Micromechanical deformation processes in toughened and particle filled semicrystalline polymers: Part 2. model representation for micromechanical deformation processes , 1998 .

[12]  B. Fisa,et al.  A model for filler—matrix debonding in glass‐bead‐filled viscoelastic polymers , 1997 .

[13]  I. Dubnikova,et al.  Debonding and fracture of particulate‐filled isotactic polypropylene , 1997 .

[14]  B. Fisa,et al.  Stress‐strain behavior and tensile dilatometry of glass bead‐filled polypropylene and polyamide 6 , 1997 .

[15]  L. Berglund,et al.  Prediction of failure initiation in polypropylene with glass beads , 1997 .

[16]  L. Berglund,et al.  Failure mechanisms in polypropylene with glass beads , 1997 .

[17]  R. Rothon Particulate-filled Polymer Composites , 1995 .

[18]  F. Maurer,et al.  Micromechanical deformations in particulate filled thermoplastics: volume strain measurements , 1994, Journal of Materials Science.

[19]  R. Landel,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Polymers and Composites , 1993 .

[20]  B. Pukánszky,et al.  Mechanism of interfacial interactions in particulate filled composites , 1993 .

[21]  A. Dahoun,et al.  Video-controlled tensile testing of polymers and metals beyond the necking point , 1992 .

[22]  A. Schouten,et al.  Polymer-filler interactions in poly(vinyl chloride) filled with glass beads: effect of grafted poly(methyl methacrylate) , 1992 .

[23]  J. J. Aartsen,et al.  Interfacial debonding in polyamide-6/glass bead composites , 1989 .

[24]  E. Vanhartingsveldt,et al.  Interfacial debonding in polyamide-6/glass bead composites , 1989 .

[25]  Pht Peter Vollenberg,et al.  Experimental determination of thermal and adhesion stress in particle filled thermoplasts , 1988 .

[26]  Pht Peter Vollenberg The mechanical behaviour of particle filled thermoplastics , 1987 .

[27]  P. Hornsby,et al.  Characterisation of distributive mixing in thermoplastics compositions , 1986 .

[28]  R. Farris,et al.  The Influence of Vacuole Formation on the Response and Failure of Filled Elastomers , 1968 .