Abstract In the pursuit of transforming the transportation sector towards sustainability, a technological shift in vehicle drive systems is being promoted worldwide. Conventional gasoline or diesel fueled cars powered by internal combustion engines (internal combustion engine vehicle, ICEV) are to be replaced with alternative cars that are electrically driven (electric vehicle, EV) and powered by a battery, which is either externally charged (battery-electric vehicle, BEV) or internally charged via a hydrogen fuel cell (fuel cell electric vehicle, FCEV). However, whether or not EVs are superior to ICEVs throughout their entire life cycle is still subject to debate. Though considerable numbers of environmental life cycle assessment (eLCA) studies and—to a much lesser extent—life cycle costing (LCC) and social life cycle assessment (sLCA) studies have already been conducted, their individual results alone do not allow decision-makers to draw conclusions concerning the overall sustainability performance of the various vehicle technologies. Therefore, we are presenting a novel approach to analyze ICEV-, BEV-, and FCEV-type passenger cars on a multidimensional basis. This approach is based upon and combines existing studies about eLCA, LCC, sLCA, and further assessments to carry out a comprehensive meta-analysis by using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods. Through a transparent and differentiated presentation of the results, the adopted approach furthermore enables decision-makers to identify specific aspects influencing the overall performance of each vehicle technology and to take measures that allow for the implementation of sustainable vehicle concepts. © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ ). Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the 27th CIRP Life Cycle Engineering (LCE) Conference.
[1]
Danilo J. Santini,et al.
Cost analysis of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles including Maintenance & Repair Costs and Resale Values
,
2012
.
[2]
Ulrich Fahl,et al.
Perspectives of electric mobility: Total cost of ownership of electric vehicles in Germany
,
2016
.
[3]
Anibal T. de Almeida,et al.
A sustainability assessment of electric vehicles as a personal mobility system
,
2012
.
[4]
Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.
The environmental performance of current and future passenger vehicles: Life cycle assessment based on a novel scenario analysis framework
,
2015
.
[5]
Jarosław Wątróbski,et al.
Multi-Criteria Analysis of Electric Vans for City Logistics
,
2017
.
[6]
Luis C. Dias,et al.
Applying Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to the Life-Cycle Assessment of vehicles
,
2015
.
[7]
S. Mühlmeier,et al.
Who will buy electric cars? An empirical study in Germany
,
2011
.
[8]
P. Vincke,et al.
Note-A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making
,
1985
.
[9]
Murat Kucukvar,et al.
Application of the TOPSIS and intuitionistic fuzzy set approaches for ranking the life cycle sustainability performance of alternative vehicle technologies
,
2016
.