Optimization of Multibrid Permanent-Magnet Wind Generator Systems

This paper investigates the cost-effective ranges of gearbox ratios and power ratings of multibrid permanent-magnet (PM) wind generator systems by using a design optimization method. First, the analytical model of a multibrid wind turbine concept consisting of a single-stage gearbox and a three-phase radial-flux PM synchronous generator with a back-to-back power converter is presented. The design optimization is adopted with a genetic algorithm for minimizing generator system cost. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the developed electromagnetic design model, the optimization results of a 500-kW direct-drive PM generator and a 1.5-MW multibrid PM generator with various gear ratios are, respectively, compared with those from other methods. Then, the optimal design approach is further employed for a range from 750 kW up to 10 MW. The optimization results of PM generator systems including direct-drive and multibrid wind turbine configurations are obtained, and the suitable ranges of gear ratios for different power ratings are investigated. Finally, the detailed comparisons of the most cost-effective multibrid PM generator system and the optimized direct-drive PM generator system are also presented and discussed. The comparative results have shown that the multibrid wind turbine concept appears more cost-effective than the direct-drive concept.

[1]  H. Polinder,et al.  Comparison of direct-drive and geared generator concepts for wind turbines , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Electric Machines and Drives, 2005..

[2]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Handbook of Evolutionary Computation , 1997 .

[3]  Anders Grauers,et al.  Design of Direct-driven Permanent-magnet Generators for Wind Turbines , 1996 .

[4]  N. Bianchi,et al.  Permanent magnet generators for wind power industry: an overall comparison with traditional generators , 1996 .

[5]  Robert Harrison,et al.  Large Wind Turbines: Design and Economics , 2001 .

[6]  Stefan Lundberg.  Performance comparison of wind park configurations , 2003 .

[7]  Jason Cotrell,et al.  A Preliminary Evaluation of a Multiple-Generator Drivetrain Configuration for Wind Turbines , 2002 .

[8]  Maxime R. Dubois,et al.  Optimized Permanent Magnet Generator Topologies for Direct-Drive Wind Turbines , 2004 .

[9]  Marian Kazmierkowski.  The Electric Generators Handbook Volume I: Synchronous Generators and Volume IIii: variable speed generators (Boldea, I.; 2006) - [Book Review] , 2007, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

[10]  H. Polinder,et al.  Conventional and TFPM linear generators for direct-drive wave energy conversion , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[11]  S. Siegfriedsen,et al.  Multibrid technology—a significant step to multi‐megawatt wind turbines , 1998 .

[12]  Asko Parviainen,et al.  Design of axial-flux permanent-magnet low-speed machines and performance comparison between radial-flux and axial-flux machines , 2005 .

[13]  Polinder,et al.  Eddy-current losses in the solid back-iron of permanent magnet machines with concentrated fractional pitch windings , 1988 .

[14]  Han Li,et al.  Application research based on improved genetic algorithm for optimum design of power transformers , 2001, ICEMS'2001. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (IEEE Cat. No.01EX501).

[15]  R. Poore,et al.  Alternative Design Study Report: WindPACT Advanced Wind Turbine Drive Train Designs Study; November 1, 2000 -- February 28, 2002 , 2003 .

[16]  Birgitte Bak-Jensen,et al.  Conceptual survey of Generators and Power Electronics for Wind Turbines , 2001 .

[17]  Li Han,et al.  OPTIMIZATION FOR INDUCTION MOTOR DESIGN BY IMPROVED GENETIC ALGORITHM , 2004 .