A generalized reconstruction framework for unconventional PET systems.

PURPOSE Quantitative estimation of the radionuclide activity concentration in positron emission tomography (PET) requires precise modeling of PET physics. The authors are focused on designing unconventional PET geometries for specific applications. This work reports the creation of a generalized reconstruction framework, capable of reconstructing tomographic PET data for systems that use right cuboidal detector elements positioned at arbitrary geometry using a regular Cartesian grid of image voxels. METHODS The authors report on a variety of design choices and optimization for the creation of the generalized framework. The image reconstruction algorithm is maximum likelihood-expectation-maximization. System geometry can be specified using a simple script. Given the geometry, a symmetry seeking algorithm finds existing symmetry in the geometry with respect to the image grid to improve the memory usage/speed. Normalization is approached from a geometry independent perspective. The system matrix is computed using the Siddon's algorithm and subcrystal approach. The program is parallelized through open multiprocessing and message passing interface libraries. A wide variety of systems can be modeled using the framework. This is made possible by modeling the underlying physics and data correction, while generalizing the geometry dependent features. RESULTS Application of the framework for three novel PET systems, each designed for a specific application, is presented to demonstrate the robustness of the framework in modeling PET systems of unconventional geometry. Three PET systems of unconventional geometry are studied. (1) Virtual-pinhole half-ring insert integrated into Biograph-40: although the insert device improves image quality over conventional whole-body scanner, the image quality varies depending on the position of the insert and the object. (2) Virtual-pinhole flat-panel insert integrated into Biograph-40: preliminary results from an investigation into a modular flat-panel insert are presented. (3) Plant PET system: a reconfigurable PET system for imaging plants, with resolution of greater than 3.3 mm, is shown. Using the automated symmetry seeking algorithm, the authors achieved a compression ratio of the storage and memory requirement by a factor of approximately 50 for the half-ring and flat-panel systems. For plant PET system, the compression ratio is approximately five. The ratio depends on the level of symmetry that exists in different geometries. CONCLUSIONS This work brings the field closer to arbitrary geometry reconstruction. A generalized reconstruction framework can be used to validate multiple hypotheses and the effort required to investigate each system is reduced. Memory usage/speed can be improved with certain optimizations.

[1]  Jinyi Qi,et al.  Iterative reconstruction techniques in emission computed tomography , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Ke Li,et al.  A dedicated high-resolution PET imager for plant sciences , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  D. Hunter,et al.  Optimization Transfer Using Surrogate Objective Functions , 2000 .

[4]  Jian Zhou,et al.  Adaptive Imaging for Lesion Detection Using a Zoom-in PET System , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  David J. Schlyer,et al.  Results from prototype II of the BNL simultaneous PET-MRI dedicated breast scanner , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[6]  Simon R. Cherry,et al.  maxPET, a dedicated mammary and axillary region PET imaging system for breast cancer , 2001 .

[7]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Clinical Imaging Characteristics of the Positron Emission Mammography Camera: PEM Flex Solo II , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Aswin Mathews,et al.  Image reconstruction and system modeling techniques for virtual-pinhole PET insert systems , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Application of annihilation coincidence detection to transaxial reconstruction tomography. , 1975, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  N. Volkow,et al.  RatCAP: miniaturized head-mounted PET for conscious rodent brain imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[11]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Fully-3D PET Image Reconstruction Using Scanner-Independent, Adaptive Projection Data and Highly Rotation-Symmetric Voxel Assemblies , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Yuan-Chuan Tai,et al.  Compton Scattering in Clinical PET/CT With High Resolution Half Ring PET Insert Device , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[13]  Neal H. Clinthorne,et al.  Real time image reconstruction using GPUs for a surgical PET imaging probe system , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[14]  Jian Zhou,et al.  Theoretical analysis and simulation study of a high-resolution zoom-in PET system. , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Determination of the attenuation map in emission tomography. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Endo-TOFPET-US: A multimodal ultrasonic probe featuring time of flight PET in diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy , 2013 .

[17]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization , 1989, Math. Program..

[18]  R. Leahy,et al.  Model-based normalization for iterative 3D PET image reconstruction , 2002 .

[19]  George Bosilca,et al.  Open MPI: Goals, Concept, and Design of a Next Generation MPI Implementation , 2004, PVM/MPI.

[20]  S. Siegel,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of a calculated attenuation correction for PET , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[21]  R. Siddon Fast calculation of the exact radiological path for a three-dimensional CT array. , 1985, Medical physics.

[22]  D. Newport,et al.  A Single Scatter Simulation Technique for Scatter Correction in 3D PET , 1996 .

[23]  R Freifelder,et al.  Dedicated PET scanners for breast imaging. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Jian Zhou,et al.  Fast and efficient fully 3D PET image reconstruction using sparse system matrix factorization with GPU acceleration. , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[26]  J F Oliver,et al.  Study of a high-resolution PET system using a silicon detector probe. , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  James F. Young,et al.  MicroPET: a high resolution PET scanner for imaging small animals , 1996, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[28]  Charles A. Bouman,et al.  Multigrid tomographic inversion with variable resolution data and image spaces , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[29]  Sang-June Park,et al.  Design of a very high-resolution small animal PET scanner using a silicon scatter detector insert , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  J. Pouliot,et al.  Development of a PET-Transrectal Ultrasound Prostate Imaging System , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[31]  W. W. Moses,et al.  List-mode maximum-likelihood reconstruction applied to positron emission mammography (PEM) with irregular sampling , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  Yuan-Chuan Tai,et al.  Improving PET imaging for breast cancer using virtual pinhole PET half-ring insert , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  Sergey Komarov,et al.  A high resolution PET insert system for clinical PET/CT scanners , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[34]  Christopher J. Thompson,et al.  Positron emission mammography (PEM): a promising technique for detecting breast cancer , 1995 .

[35]  Joseph A. O'Sullivan,et al.  Virtual-Pinhole PET , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[36]  Yuan-Chuan Tai,et al.  2D linear and iterative reconstruction algorithms for a PET-insert scanner. , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.