A systemic approach to hazard analysis and control based on energy function

The hazard analysis and control is one of the most significant issues of the safety management process. The paper proposes a new approach to systemically identify and analyze multi-hazards. The energy function was first studied, summing up the energies involved in production and lives of the national economy with a unified function. Relationships between common production accidents and corresponding energies was presented. In order to take measures in emergency rescue based on energy change, four properties of energy, storability, additivity, transitivity and transformability, were analyzed. The method provide guidance for hazard identification and prevention, and it is proved by guiding the hazard identification of coal mine and carry out effective measures to prevent occurrence of disaster. It indicates that the proposed approach propose a systemic method to analyze multiple hazards and reduce risk of abnormal energy transfer.

[1]  Guoliang Feng,et al.  Optimal route of emergency resource scheduling based on GIS , 2017, EM-GIS.

[2]  Andrew Hale,et al.  The development of an audit technique to assess the quality of safety barrier management. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[3]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  The Walkerton E. coli outbreak: a test of Rasmussen's framework for risk management in a dynamic society , 2006 .

[4]  Dong Yuhua,et al.  Estimation of failure probability of oil and gas transmission pipelines by fuzzy fault tree analysis , 2005 .

[5]  J. Vrijling,et al.  An overview of quantitative risk measures for loss of life and economic damage. , 2003, Journal of hazardous materials.

[6]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[7]  Birgitte Rasmussen,et al.  Accidents and risk control , 1997 .

[8]  Gianluca Pescaroli,et al.  A definition of cascading disasters and cascading effects: Going beyond the “toppling dominos” metaphor , 2015 .

[9]  Lars Harms-Ringdahl,et al.  Analysis of safety functions and barriers in accidents , 2009 .

[10]  Jian Shuai,et al.  The energy source based job safety analysis and application in the project , 2017 .

[11]  Sidney Dekker,et al.  Drift into Failure: From Hunting Broken Components to Understanding Complex Systems , 2011 .

[12]  Adiel Teixeira de Almeida,et al.  Multidimensional risk evaluation of natural gas pipelines based on a multicriteria decision model using visualization tools and statistical tests for global sensitivity analysis , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Paul W. H. Chung,et al.  State-based modelling in hazard identification , 2003, Applied Intelligence.

[14]  Lars Harms-Ringdahl,et al.  Assessing safety functions--results from a case study at an industrial workplace , 2003 .

[15]  Andrew Hopkins The Problem of Defining High Reliability Organisations , 2007 .

[16]  Jochen Teizer,et al.  Ontology-based semantic modeling of construction safety knowledge: Towards automated safety planning for job hazard analysis (JHA) , 2015 .

[17]  Gianluca Pescaroli,et al.  Critical infrastructure, panarchies and the vulnerability paths of cascading disasters , 2016, Natural Hazards.

[18]  Cécile Fiévez,et al.  ARAMIS project: a more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[19]  Neil Barrett THE CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE , 1998 .

[20]  Cao Qinggui,et al.  Risk management and workers’ safety behavior control in coal mine , 2012 .

[21]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  Feng Li,et al.  A method for simulating the entire leaking process and calculating the liquid leakage volume of a damaged pressurized pipeline. , 2017, Journal of hazardous materials.

[23]  Norio Okada,et al.  Methodology for preliminary assessment of Natech risk in urban areas , 2008 .

[24]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  A new accident model for engineering safer systems , 2004 .