Modelling suppression difficulty: current and future applications

Improving decision processes and the informational basis upon which decisions are made in pursuit of safer and more effective fire response have become key priorities of the fire research community. One area of emphasis is bridging the gap between fire researchers and managers through development of application-focused, operationally relevant decision support tools. In this paper we focus on a family of such tools designed to characterise the difficulty of suppression operations by weighing suppression challenges against suppression opportunities. These tools integrate potential fire behaviour, vegetation cover types, topography, road and trail networks, existing fuel breaks and fireline production potential to map the operational effort necessary for fire suppression. We include case studies from two large fires in the USA and Spain to demonstrate model updates and improvements intended to better capture extreme fire behaviour and present results demonstrating successful fire containment where suppression difficulty index (SDI) values were low and containment only after a moderation of fire weather where SDI values were high. A basic aim of this work is reducing the uncertainty and increasing the efficiency of suppression operations through assessment of landscape conditions and incorporation of expert knowledge into planning.

[1]  Yu Wei,et al.  Spatial optimization of operationally relevant large fire confine and point protection strategies: model development and test cases , 2018 .

[2]  Changhui Peng,et al.  Application of machine-learning methods in forest ecology: recent progress and future challenges , 2018, Environmental Reviews.

[3]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Integrated national-scale assessment of wildfire risk to human and ecological values , 2011 .

[4]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  The Exposure Index: Developing firefighter safety performance measures , 2011 .

[5]  Bret W. Butler,et al.  Safe separation distance score: a new metric for evaluating wildland firefighter safety zones using lidar , 2017, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[6]  David E. Calkin,et al.  Engaging the fire before it starts: A case study from the 2017 Pinal Fire (Arizona) , 2019 .

[7]  David L. Martell,et al.  A Review of Initial Attack Fire Crew Productivity and Effectiveness , 1996 .

[8]  Alan A. Ager,et al.  AEGIS: a wildfire prevention and management information system , 2015 .

[9]  David E. Calkin,et al.  Characterising resource use and potential inefficiencies during large-fire suppression in the western US , 2017 .

[10]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  A real-time risk assessment tool supporting wildland fire decisionmaking , 2011 .

[11]  Michael C. Wimberly,et al.  Estimation of wildfire size and risk changes due to fuels treatments , 2012 .

[12]  David L. Martell,et al.  Productivity of Ontario initial-attack fire crews: results of an expert-judgement elicitation study , 2004 .

[13]  José G. Borges,et al.  Cohesive fire management within an uncertain environment: A review of risk handling and decision support systems , 2015 .

[14]  Thomas J. Cova,et al.  Identification of firefighter safety zones using lidar , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[15]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Spatial and temporal assessment of responder exposure to snag hazards in post-fire environments , 2019, Forest Ecology and Management.

[16]  James P. Minas,et al.  An integrated optimization model for fuel management and fire suppression preparedness planning , 2013, Annals of Operations Research.

[17]  Yu Wei,et al.  A stochastic mixed integer program to model spatial wildfire behavior and suppression placement decisions with uncertain weather , 2016 .

[18]  Bret W. Butler,et al.  A LiDAR-based analysis of the effects of slope, vegetation density, and ground surface roughness on travel rates for wildland firefighter escape route mapping , 2017 .

[19]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  A Risk-Based Approach to Wildland Fire Budgetary Planning , 2013 .

[20]  Francisco Rodríguez y Silva,et al.  Contribution of suppression difficulty and lessons learned in forecasting fire suppression operations productivity: A methodological approach , 2016 .

[21]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Application of Wildfire Risk Assessment Results to Wildfire Response Planning in the Southern Sierra Nevada, California, USA , 2016 .

[22]  Crystal S. Stonesifer,et al.  Fighting fire in the heat of the day: an analysis of operational and environmental conditions of use for large airtankers in United States fire suppression , 2016 .

[23]  Armando González-Cabán,et al.  'SINAMI': a tool for the economic evaluation of forest fire management programs in Mediterranean ecosystems , 2010 .

[24]  Patrick H. Freeborn,et al.  Towards improving wildland firefighter situational awareness through daily fire behaviour risk assessments in the US Northern Rockies and Northern Great Basin , 2017 .

[25]  Domingos Xavier Viegas,et al.  A Mathematical Model For Forest Fires Blowup , 2004 .

[26]  Yu Wei,et al.  A mixed integer program to model spatial wildfire behavior and suppression placement decisions , 2015 .

[27]  Yu Wei,et al.  Risk Management and Analytics in Wildfire Response , 2019, Current Forestry Reports.

[28]  Susan L. Roberts,et al.  Principles of Effective USA Federal Fire Management Plans , 2015, Fire Ecology.

[29]  David E Calkin,et al.  Production and efficiency of large wildland fire suppression effort: A stochastic frontier analysis. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[30]  Bret W. Butler,et al.  Escape Route Index: A Spatially-Explicit Measure of Wildland Firefighter Egress Capacity , 2019, Fire.

[31]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  A review of challenges to determining and demonstrating efficiency of large fire management , 2017 .

[32]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  The influence of incident management teams on the deployment of wildfire suppression resources , 2017 .

[33]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  An empirical machine learning method for predicting potential fire control locations for pre-fire planning and operational fire management , 2017 .

[34]  Mike D. Flannigan,et al.  Potential climate change impacts on fire intensity and key wildfire suppression thresholds in Canada , 2017 .

[35]  T. D. Penman,et al.  Examining the relative effects of fire weather, suppression and fuel treatment on fire behaviour--a simulation study. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[36]  Michael J. Jenkins,et al.  Wildfire’s resistance to control in mountain pine beetle-attacked lodgepole pine forests , 2013 .

[37]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Rethinking the Wildland Fire Management System , 2018, Journal of Forestry.

[38]  David E. Calkin,et al.  Econometric analysis of fire suppression production functions for large wildland fires , 2013 .

[39]  Matt P. Plucinski,et al.  Contain and Control: Wildfire Suppression Effectiveness at Incidents and Across Landscapes , 2019, Current Forestry Reports.

[40]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Towards enhanced risk management: Planning, decision making and monitoring of US wildfire response , 2017 .

[41]  David L. Martell,et al.  A Review of Recent Forest and Wildland Fire Management Decision Support Systems Research , 2015, Current Forestry Reports.

[42]  Thomas J. Duff,et al.  Improving Fire Behaviour Data Obtained from Wildfires , 2018 .

[43]  Bret W. Butler,et al.  An empirically based approach to defining wildland firefighter safety and survival zone separation distances , 2017 .

[44]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Getting Ahead of the Wildfire Problem: Quantifying and Mapping Management Challenges and Opportunities , 2016 .

[45]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying the influence of previously burned areas on suppression effectiveness and avoided exposure: A case study of the Las Conchas Fire , 2016 .

[46]  Francisco Rodríguez y Silva,et al.  A methodology for determining operational priorities for prevention and suppression of wildland fires , 2014 .

[47]  Sarah McCaffrey,et al.  Defining Extreme Wildfire Events: Difficulties, Challenges, and Impacts , 2018 .

[48]  Abdul Alkalimat,et al.  From Black to eBlack: The Digital Transformation of Black Studies Pedagogy , 2012 .

[49]  Kevin G. Tolhurst,et al.  Operational wildfire suppression modelling: a review evaluating development, state of the art and future directions , 2015 .

[50]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  A framework for developing safe and effective large-fire response in a new fire management paradigm , 2017 .

[51]  Alexandre Arnhold,et al.  Multispectral characterization, prediction and mapping of Thaumastocoris peregrinus (Hemiptera: Thamascoridae) attack in Eucalyptus plantations using remote sensing , 2016 .

[52]  Matthew P. Thompson.  Social, Institutional, and Psychological Factors Affecting Wildfire Incident Decision Making , 2014 .

[53]  J. Beverly,et al.  Time since prior wildfire affects subsequent fire containment in black spruce , 2017 .

[54]  Crystal S. Stonesifer,et al.  Developing an aviation exposure index to inform risk-based fire management decisions , 2014 .

[55]  Carol Miller,et al.  Wildland fire as a self-regulating mechanism: the role of previous burns and weather in limiting fire progression. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[56]  Q. Mcnemar.  Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages , 1947, Psychometrika.

[57]  S. Zibtsev,et al.  An integrated approach for mapping fire suppression difficulty in three different ecosystems of Eastern Europe , 2016 .