Uncovering neuroanatomical correlates of impaired coordinated movement after pallidal deep brain stimulation

Background The loss of the ability to swim following deep brain stimulation (DBS), although rare, poses a worrisome risk of drowning. It is unclear what anatomic substrate and neural circuitry underlie this phenomenon. We report a case of cervical dystonia with lost ability to swim and dance during active stimulation of globus pallidus internus. We investigated the anatomical underpinning of this phenomenon using unique functional and structural imaging analysis. Methods Tesla (3T) functional MRI (fMRI) of the patient was used during active DBS and compared with a cohort of four matched patients without this side effect. Structural connectivity mapping was used to identify brain network engagement by stimulation. Results fMRI during stimulation revealed significant (Pbonferroni<0.0001) stimulation-evoked responses (DBS ON<OFF) in the supplementary motor area (SMA). Probabilistic tractography revealed that the patient’s VTAs engaged streamlines projecting to SMA. Compared with a cohort of matched controls, the stimulation-dependent change in blood oxygen level-dependent response at the SMA was 2.18 SD below the mean. Conclusions These stimulation-induced impairments are likely a manifestation of a broader deficit in interlimb coordination mediated by stimulation effects on the SMA. This neuroanatomical underpinning can help inform future patient-specific stimulation and targeting.

[1]  M. Tijssen,et al.  DBS for dystonia: Should we take our patients to the swimming pool? , 2022, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[2]  Bryan M. Li,et al.  Predicting optimal deep brain stimulation parameters for Parkinson’s disease using functional MRI and machine learning , 2021, Nature Communications.

[3]  A. Jacques,et al.  Deep Brain Stimulation and Swimming Performance: A Randomized Within-person Crossover Study , 2021 .

[4]  Suneil K. Kalia,et al.  Probabilistic Mapping of Deep Brain Stimulation: Insights from 15 Years of Therapy , 2020, Annals of neurology.

[5]  M. Okun,et al.  Case Report: Globus Pallidus Internus (GPi) Deep Brain Stimulation Induced Keyboard Typing Dysfunction , 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

[6]  D. Waldvogel,et al.  Author response: Beware of deep water after subthalamic deep brain stimulation , 2020, Neurology.

[7]  A. Crawley,et al.  3-Tesla MRI of deep brain stimulation patients: safety assessment of coils and pulse sequences. , 2020, Journal of neurosurgery.

[8]  H. Bergman,et al.  Deep brain stimulation: current challenges and future directions , 2019, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[9]  A. Engel,et al.  Adverse events in deep brain stimulation: A retrospective long-term analysis of neurological, psychiatric and other occurrences , 2017, PloS one.

[10]  A. Lozano,et al.  Programming Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor and Dystonia: The Toronto Western Hospital Algorithms , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[11]  A. Lozano,et al.  Probing and Regulating Dysfunctional Circuits Using Deep Brain Stimulation , 2013, Neuron.

[12]  Hugues Leblanc,et al.  Arm-leg coordination in recreational and competitive breaststroke swimmers. , 2009, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[13]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Threshold-free cluster enhancement: Addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference , 2009, NeuroImage.

[14]  C. Kennard,et al.  Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  J. Saint-Cyr,et al.  Primary Dystonia Is More Responsive than Secondary Dystonia to Pallidal Interventions: Outcome after Pallidotomy or Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation , 2004, Neurosurgery.

[16]  R. Simpson,et al.  Risks of common complications in deep brain stimulation surgery: management and avoidance. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery.