Engaging stakeholders in the assessment of NBS effectiveness in flood risk reduction: A participatory System Dynamics Model for benefits and co-benefits evaluation.

There is an imperative worldwide need to identify effective approaches to deal with water-related risks, and mainly with increasingly frequent floods, as well as with severe droughts. Particularly, policy and decision-makers are trying to identify systemic strategies that, going beyond the mere risk reduction, should be capable to deal simultaneously with multiple challenges (such as climate resilience, health and well-being, quality of life), thus providing additional benefits. In this direction, the contribution of Nature Based Solutions (NBS) is relevant, although their wider implementation is still hampered by several barriers, such as the uncertainty and lack of information on their long-term behavior and the difficulty of quantitatively valuing their multidimensional impacts. The activities described in the present paper, carried out within the EU funded project NAIAD, mainly aim at developing a participatory System Dynamic Model capable to quantitatively assess the effectiveness of NBS to deal with flood risks, while producing a multiplicity of co-benefits. The adoption of a participatory approach supported both to increase the available knowledge and the awareness about the potential of NBS and hybrid measures (e.g. a combination of NBS and socio-institutional ones). Specific reference is made to one of the demos of the NAIAD project, namely the Glinščica river case study (Slovenia).

[1]  Nuno Videira,et al.  Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Participatory Modeling to Elicit Behavioral Drivers in Environmental Dilemmas: the Case of Air Pollution in Talca, Chile , 2018, Environmental Management.

[2]  A. Biswas,et al.  Built infrastructure is essential , 2015, Science.

[3]  Yang-Chi Chang,et al.  Integrated wetland management: an analysis with group model building based on system dynamics model. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  Emmanuelle Cohen-Shacham,et al.  Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges , 2016 .

[5]  Slobodan P. Simonovic,et al.  Simulation of Multiple Hydropower Reservoir Operations Using System Dynamics Approach , 2014, Water Resources Management.

[6]  Davide Geneletti,et al.  A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas , 2017 .

[7]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[8]  N. Videira,et al.  Modelling feedback processes underpinning management of ecosystem services: The role of participatory systems mapping , 2017 .

[9]  Jay W. Forrester,et al.  Lessons from system dynamics modeling , 1987 .

[10]  Nicolas Faivre,et al.  Translating the Sendai Framework into action: The EU approach to ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction , 2017, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[11]  Alessandro Pagano,et al.  Assessing stakeholders' risk perception to promote Nature Based Solutions as flood protection strategies: The case of the Glinščica river (Slovenia). , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  Siddharth Narayan,et al.  The Value of Coastal Wetlands for Flood Damage Reduction in the Northeastern USA , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[13]  Alessandro Pagano,et al.  Drinking water supply in resilient cities: Notes from L’Aquila earthquake case study , 2017 .

[14]  Yu-Pin Lin,et al.  Application of System Dynamics on Shallow Multipurpose Artificial Lakes: A Case Study of Detention Pond at Tainan, Taiwan , 2010 .

[15]  Katherine A. Daniell,et al.  Boundary matters: the potential of system dynamics to support sustainability? , 2017 .

[16]  Patrick Hirsch,et al.  Training decision-makers in flood response with system dynamics , 2016 .

[17]  M. Hinsberger,et al.  Flood partnerships: a participatory approach to develop and implement the Flood Risk Management Plans , 2017 .

[18]  Paolo D'Odorico,et al.  Manage water in a green way , 2015, Science.

[19]  Alessandro Pagano,et al.  Integrated Approach for Supporting Sustainable Water Resources Management of Irrigation Based on the WEFN Framework , 2019, Water Resources Management.

[20]  Jaroslav Mysiak,et al.  An assessment framework for climate-proof nature-based solutions. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  Davide Geneletti,et al.  An impact evaluation framework to support planning and evaluation of nature-based solutions projects , 2017 .

[22]  Shuai Wei,et al.  Application of System Dynamics to Water Security Research , 2013, Water Resources Management.

[23]  Siyu Zeng,et al.  Enhancing future resilience in urban drainage system: Green versus grey infrastructure. , 2017, Water research.

[24]  Domenico Camarda,et al.  Fuzzy cognitive mapping to support multi-agent decisions in development of urban policymaking , 2019, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[25]  François Bousquet,et al.  Modelling with stakeholders , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[26]  Jochen Schanze,et al.  Nature‐based solutions in flood risk management – Buzzword or innovation? , 2017 .

[27]  N. Frantzeskaki,et al.  Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action , 2016 .

[28]  Stephen Darby,et al.  Evaluating sustainable adaptation strategies for vulnerable mega-deltas using system dynamics modelling: Rice agriculture in the Mekong Delta's An Giang Province, Vietnam. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[29]  Alessandro Pagano,et al.  Modelling the complexity of the network of interactions in flood emergency management: The Lorca flash flood case , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[30]  Alessandro Pagano,et al.  An index-based approach for the sustainability assessment of irrigation practice based on the water-energy-food nexus framework , 2017 .

[31]  Krystyna Anne Stave,et al.  Participatory system dynamics modeling for sustainable environmental management: Observations from four cases , 2010 .

[32]  Jessica Lamond,et al.  Recognising barriers to implementation of Blue-Green Infrastructure: a Newcastle case study , 2017 .

[33]  Alexis Tsoukiàs,et al.  A system dynamics model for supporting decision-makers in irrigation water management. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[34]  Dagmar Haase,et al.  The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[35]  K. Rich,et al.  Participatory systems approaches for urban and peri-urban agriculture planning: The role of system dynamics and spatial group model building , 2018 .

[36]  Martina Flörke,et al.  FCMs as a common base for linking participatory products and models , 2017 .

[37]  Leonard A. Smith,et al.  Overcoming uncertainty and barriers to adoption of Blue‐Green Infrastructure for urban flood risk management , 2018 .

[38]  Weiping Chen,et al.  Influences of setting sizes and combination of green infrastructures on community’s stormwater runoff reduction , 2015 .

[39]  Z. Ouyang,et al.  Drivers of β‐diversity along latitudinal gradients revisited , 2013 .

[40]  S. Keesstra,et al.  The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[41]  Suzanne A. Pierce,et al.  Modelling with stakeholders e Next generation , 2015 .

[42]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  Multi-criteria Approach for Selection of Green and Grey Infrastructure to Reduce Flood Risk and Increase CO-benefits , 2018, Water Resources Management.

[43]  Barbara Schröter,et al.  Addressing societal challenges through nature-based solutions: How can landscape planning and governance research contribute? , 2019, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[44]  Simon Peck,et al.  Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics , 1996, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[45]  J. Forrester Principles of systems : text and workbook, chapters 1 through 10 , 1968 .

[46]  Soojin You,et al.  Simulation modeling for a resilience improvement plan for natural disasters in a coastal area. , 2018, Environmental pollution.

[47]  Jesus R. Gastelum,et al.  The Use of System Dynamics Model to Enhance Integrated Resources Planning Implementation , 2018, Water Resources Management.

[48]  Sai Hin Lai,et al.  The state-of-the-art system dynamics application in integrated water resources modeling. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[49]  Huihui Wang,et al.  Intelligent simulation of aquatic environment economic policy coupled ABM and SD models. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[50]  Alessandro Pagano,et al.  Dealing with Uncertainty in Decision-Making for Drinking Water Supply Systems Exposed to Extreme Events , 2018, Water Resources Management.

[51]  Virgilio Hermoso,et al.  Designing a network of green infrastructure to enhance the conservation value of protected areas and maintain ecosystem services. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[52]  Alexis Tsoukiàs,et al.  Design Theory for Generating Alternatives in Public Decision Making Processes , 2019, Group Decision and Negotiation.

[53]  Carlos Alonso,et al.  Using fuzzy cognitive maps for predicting river management responses: A case study of the Esla River basin, Spain , 2017 .

[54]  Thuc D. Phan,et al.  Assessment of the vulnerability of a coastal freshwater system to climatic and non-climatic changes: A system dynamics approach , 2018 .

[55]  Fabio Masi,et al.  Integrated valuation of a nature-based solution for water pollution control. Highlighting hidden benefits , 2016 .

[56]  Edoardo Bertone,et al.  Evaluating a novel tiered scarcity adjusted water budget and pricing structure using a holistic systems modelling approach. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.