Two imaging techniques for 3D quantification of pre-cementation space for CAD/CAM crowns.

OBJECTIVES Internal three-dimensional (3D) "fit" of prostheses to prepared teeth is likely more important clinically than "fit" judged only at the level of the margin (i.e. marginal "opening"). This work evaluates two techniques for quantitatively defining 3D "fit", both using pre-cementation space impressions: X-ray microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) and quantitative optical analysis. Both techniques are of interest for comparison of CAD/CAM system capabilities and for documenting "fit" as part of clinical studies. METHODS Pre-cementation space impressions were taken of a single zirconia coping on its die using a low viscosity poly(vinyl siloxane) impression material. Calibration specimens of this material were fabricated between the measuring platens of a micrometre. Both calibration curves and pre-cementation space impression data sets were obtained by examination using micro-CT and quantitative optical analysis. Regression analysis was used to compare calibration curves with calibration sets. RESULTS Micro-CT calibration data showed tighter 95% confidence intervals and was able to measure over a wider thickness range than for the optical technique. Regions of interest (e.g., lingual, cervical) were more easily analysed with optical image analysis and this technique was more suitable for extremely thin impression walls (<10-15μm). Specimen preparation is easier for micro-CT and segmentation parameters appeared to capture dimensions accurately. CONCLUSIONS Both micro-CT and the optical method can be used to quantify the thickness of pre-cementation space impressions. Each has advantages and limitations but either technique has the potential for use as part of clinical studies or CAD/CAM protocol optimization.

[1]  Stig Karlsson,et al.  Fit of a new pressure-sintered zirconium dioxide coping. , 2004, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[2]  S. Campbell,et al.  Nondestructive, three-dimensional internal fit mapping of fixed prostheses. , 1989, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  Norman C. Craig,et al.  Physical Chemistry, 2nd Edition (Berry, R. Stephen; Rice, Stuart A.; Ross, John) , 2001 .

[4]  T Nakamura,et al.  In vitro fitting accuracy of copy-milled alumina cores and all-ceramic crowns. , 2000, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[5]  J Dejou,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns--validation of the silicone replica method. , 2007, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[6]  A W Miller,et al.  Factors affecting the retention and fit of gold castings. , 1987, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  C E Brukl,et al.  The fit of molded all-ceramic, twin foil, and conventional ceramic crowns. , 1987, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  S. Bayne,et al.  Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  S. Campbell,et al.  Use of an elastomeric material to improve the occlusal seat and marginal seal of cast restorations. , 1989, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  Pablo González de Villaumbrosia,et al.  Comparison of the marginal fit of Procera AllCeram crowns with two finish lines. , 2003, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[11]  S Newman,et al.  The effect of multiple layers of die-spacer on crown retention. , 1992, Operative dentistry.

[12]  F Toffenetti,et al.  Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports. , 2000, Quintessence international.