Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong

There is an increasing complexity and interplay between all the issues associated with property portfolio decisions. This paper explores the relationships between financial, environmental and social parameters associated with building adaptive reuse. An adaptive reuse potential (ARP) model is developed and discussed in the context of its application to the Hong Kong market. The model can assist in the transformation of the traditional decision-making processes of property stakeholders towards more sustainable practices, strategies and outcomes, by providing a means by which the industry can identify and rank existing buildings that have high potential for adaptive reuse. This in turn enhances Hong Kong's ability for sustainable, responsive energy and natural resource management by allowing issues regarding excessive and inappropriate resource use to be identified and assessed, and enabling appropriate management strategies to be implemented. The ARP model proposed in this paper provides, illustrated by a real case study, an important step in making better use of the facilities we already have and the residual life embedded in them.

[1]  Keiichiro Zushi Potential Residential Buildings for Adaptive Reuse – Cincinnati’s CBD , 2005 .

[2]  John R. Mansfield Much discussed, much misunderstood: a critical evaluation of the term obsolescence , 2000 .

[3]  N. Doratli Revitalizing historic urban quarters: A model for determining the most relevant strategic approach , 2005 .

[4]  Craig Langston Life-Cost Approach to Building Evaluation , 2005 .

[5]  Grace Ding,et al.  A methodology for assessing the sustainability of construction projects and facilities , 2002 .

[6]  S. Tiesdell,et al.  Revitalising Historic Urban Quarters , 1996 .

[7]  D. Spennemann,et al.  The Future of Defunct Religious Buildings: Dutch Approaches to Their Adaptive Re-use , 2007 .

[8]  R. Shipley,et al.  Does Adaptive Reuse Pay? A Study of the Business of Building Renovation in Ontario, Canada , 2006 .

[9]  Rick Ball,et al.  Developers, regeneration and sustainability issues in the reuse of vacant industrial buildings , 1999 .

[10]  Charles J. Kibert,et al.  Developing indicators of sustainability: US experience , 1998 .

[11]  Dorothy Henehan,et al.  Building Change of Use : Renovating, Adapting, and Altering Commercial, Institutional, and Industrial Properties , 2003 .

[12]  Stephen Spector Creating Schools and Strengthening Communities through Adaptive Reuse. , 2003 .

[13]  John Abbotts,et al.  Building leasing at the department of energy's Hanford site: Lessons learned from commercial reuse , 2003 .

[14]  M. Pelt,et al.  Ecological Sustainability and Project Appraisal: Case Studies in Developing Countries , 1993 .

[15]  Donald F. Fournier,et al.  Integrating Sustainable Design Principles into the Adaptive Reuse of Historical Properties , 2004 .

[16]  Nathaniel Lichfield Economics in urban conservation: Planning for urban conservation , 1989 .

[17]  Nick Hanley,et al.  Are there environmental limits to cost benefit analysis? , 1990 .

[18]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Multicriteria evaluation in physical planning , 1990 .

[19]  Jeanne. McKeague,et al.  On adaptive reuse , 1978 .

[20]  N. Gallent,et al.  New uses for England's old airfields , 2000 .

[21]  David Gann,et al.  Flexibility in building use: the technical feasibility of converting redundant offices into flats , 1996 .

[22]  Craig Langston,et al.  Increasing the environmental performance of property developments: a developer's perspective , 2006 .

[23]  F. Meillaud,et al.  Evaluation of a building using the emergy method , 2005 .

[24]  Peter Abelson,et al.  Project Appraisal and Valuation of the Environment: General Principles and Six Case-Studies in Developing Countries , 1996 .

[25]  David Kincaid,et al.  Adaptability potentials for buildings and infrastructure in sustainable cities , 2000 .

[26]  Daniel C. Abel,et al.  Environmental Issues: Measuring, Analyzing, and Evaluating , 1998 .

[27]  William E. Rees,et al.  The built environment and the ecosphere: a global perspective , 1999 .

[28]  I. Seeley Building Economics: Appraisal and Control of Building Design Cost and Efficiency , 1972 .

[29]  S. Bell,et al.  Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable? , 1999 .

[30]  M. Lane,et al.  Conservation through Conversation: Collaborative Planning for Reuse of a Former Military Property in Sauk County, Wisconsin, USA , 2002 .

[31]  Peter A. Bullen Adaptive reuse and sustainability of commercial buildings , 2007 .

[32]  Tahir Husain,et al.  GreenPro-I: a risk-based life cycle assessment and decision-making methodology for process plant design , 2002, Environ. Model. Softw..

[33]  Craig Langston,et al.  Sustainable Practices in the Built Environment , 2008 .

[34]  Joe Doak Planning for the Reuse of Redundant Defence Estate: Disposal Processes, Policy Frameworks and Development Impacts , 1999 .

[35]  Tim Heath,et al.  Adaptive re-use of offices for residential use , 2001 .

[36]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Multicriteria analysis for land-use management , 1998 .

[37]  Craig Langston,et al.  Strategic Management of Built Facilities , 2002 .

[38]  Tara A. Johnson SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL ISSUES IN THE SUCCESSFUL ADAPTIVE REUSE OF CHURCHES , 2004 .

[39]  Sophie Francesca Cantell The Adaptive Reuse of Historic Industrial Buildings: Regulation Barriers, Best Practices and Case Studies , 2005 .

[40]  Harvey K. Newman Historic Preservation Policy and Regime Politics in Atlanta , 2001 .

[41]  Gordon H. Huang,et al.  A derivative algorithm for inexact quadratic program - application to environmental decision-making under uncertainty , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  Ben Ho-Sing Poon Buildings Recycled—City Refurbished , 2001 .

[43]  A. Leone Late Antique North Africa: Production and Changing Use of Buildings in Urban Areas , 2003 .

[44]  Gosa Shivers Once Is Never Enough , 2006 .