Inappropriate Detection of Supraventricular Arrhythmias by Implantable Dual Chamber Defibrillators: A Comparison of Four Different Algorithms

HINTRINGER, F., et al.: Inappropriate Detection of Supraventricular Arrhythmias by Implantable Dual Chamber Defibrillators: A Comparison of Four Different Algorithms. Inappropriate therapy of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias by an ICD is still a common problem. Dual chamber (DDD) ICDs provide additional atrial sensing and should result in higher specificity for detection of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, a direct comparison of different dual chamber algorithms has not been reported. The detection algorithms of four different DDD ICDs were tested: Phylax AV, Defender IV, Ventak AV III DR, and Gem DR 7271. Based on arrhythmias recorded from patients undergoing invasive electrophysiological studies and in many cases of catheter ablation at our institution, a library consisting of 71 supraventricular and 15 ventricular tachyarrhythmias was created. The library consists of episodes of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter with different AV conduction, typical and atypical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, AV reentrant tachycardia, sinus tachycardia, and ventricular tachycardia with and without ventriculoatrial conduction. Atrial fibrillation was appropriately classified by all four algorithms. However, the specificity for detection of other supraventricular tachyarrhythmias achieved by the Biotronik (12%) and the Guidant (11%) devices was significantly lower compared to the specificity of the ELA (28%) and the Medtronic DDD ICD (20%). This is due to the fact that the Biotronik and the Guidant algorithm classified all supraventricular tachyarrhythmias resulting in a stable ventricular rate as ventricular tachycardia, whereas the ELA and Medtronic algorithms performed a more detailed analysis by assessment of PR association, atrial onset, or timing of the atrial event relative to the ventricular event, respectively. Atrial fibrillation, the most common supraventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients with ICD, was detected by all devices.

[1]  V. Kühlkamp,et al.  Clinical Experience with the New Detection Algorithms for Atrial Fibrillation of a Defibrillator with Dual Chamber Sensing and Pacing , 1999, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[2]  M. Gold,et al.  A New Defibrillator Discrimination Algorithm Utilizing Electrogram Morphology Analysis , 1999, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[3]  P A Wolf,et al.  Prevalence, incidence, prognosis, and predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation: population-based estimates. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  A. Natale,et al.  Prospective Evaluation of New and Old Criteria to Discriminate Between Supraventricular and Ventricular Tachycardia in Implantable Defibrillators , 1998, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[5]  J. Brugada,et al.  Enhanced Detection Criteria in Implantable Defibrillators , 1998, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[6]  C. Schuger,et al.  Ventriculoatrial Conduction Capability and Prevalence of 1:1 Retrograde Conduction During Inducible Sustained Monomorphic Ventricular Tacbycardia in 305 Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Recipients , 1997, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[7]  J. Daubert,et al.  Preliminary Clinical Experience with the First Dual Chamber Pacemaker Defibrillator , 1997, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[8]  P. S. Chen,et al.  Discrimination of ventricular tachycardia from sinus tachycardia and atrial fibrillation in a tiered-therapy cardioverter-defibrillator. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  C. Schmitt,et al.  Significance of Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Patients with Implanted Pacing Cardioverter Defibrillators , 1994, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[10]  F. Marchlinski,et al.  Electrocardiographically Documented Unnecessary, Spontaneous Shocks in 241 Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators , 1992, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.