Normal cranial nerves in the cavernous sinuses: contrast-enhanced three-dimensional constructive interference in the steady state MR imaging.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Three-dimensional (3D) constructive interference in steady state (CISS) MR imaging is useful for demonstrating cranial nerves (CNs) in the cistern. The purpose of this study was to evaluate normal CNs III, IV, V1, V2, and VI in the cavernous sinuses by using contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional (3D), Fourier transformation CISS MR imaging. METHODS In 76 normal cavernous sinuses from 38 patients, detectability of CNs III-VI in the bilateral cavernous sinuses was evaluated by using contrast-enhanced 3D CISS MR imaging. In 40 cavernous sinuses from 20 patients, contrast-enhanced 3D CISS and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging were compared for the detectability of these CNs. RESULTS Each CN was separately demonstrated, and in 11 patients (29%), all CNs in the cavernous sinuses were identified on contrast-enhanced 3D CISS MR imaging. The images depicted the intracavernous segments of CNs III, IV, V1, V2, and VI in 76 (100%), 46 (61%), 70 (92%), 67 (88%), and 73 (96%) of the 76 sinuses, respectively. In comparison of imaging techniques, contrast-enhanced 3D CISS MR imaging had a detection rate significantly higher than that of enhanced T1-weighting imaging (P < .05) in all CNs except for CN III, which was detected in 100% of cases with both techniques. CONCLUSION Contrast-enhanced 3D CISS MR imaging provides clear images of each CN in the cavernous segment. This useful method may contribute to the diagnosis of diseases involving the cavernous sinuses, such as Tolosa-Hunt syndrome.

[1]  W. Nitz,et al.  Comparison of 2-D turbo spin echo and 3-D gradient echo sequences for the detection of the trigeminal nerve and branches anatomy. , 2001, European journal of radiology.

[2]  J. Dietemann,et al.  Is there a dural wall between the cavernous sinus and the pituitary fossa? Anatomical and MRI findings , 1998, Neuroradiology.

[3]  B. Eisenkraft,et al.  Imaging evaluation of cranial nerves 3, 4, and 6. , 2001, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[4]  M. Castillo.  Imaging of the upper cranial nerves I, III-VIII, and the cavernous sinuses. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[5]  R. Sigal,et al.  Visibility of cranial nerves at MRI. , 1990, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[6]  M. Takahashi,et al.  Cavernous sinus: correlation between anatomic and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging findings. , 1991, Radiology.

[7]  T A Yousry,et al.  Detailed magnetic resonance imaging anatomy of the cisternal segment of the abducent nerve: Dorello's canal and neurovascular relationships and landmarks. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[8]  W. Nitz,et al.  Comparison of 2D and 3D MRI of the optic and oculomotor nerve anatomy. , 2000, Clinical imaging.

[9]  M. Wiesmann,et al.  Visualization of cranial nerves I–XII: value of 3D CISS and T2-weighted FSE sequences , 2000, European Radiology.

[10]  M Takahashi,et al.  Contrast-enhanced CISS MRI of vestibular schwannomas: phantom and clinical studies. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[11]  C. Tulleken,et al.  The cavernous sinus syndrome an anatomical and clinical study , 1988, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[12]  C Fellner,et al.  MRI of inner ear anatomy using 3D MP-RAGE and 3D CISS sequences. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  J. Taptas.  The so-called cavernous sinus: a review of the controversy and its implications for neurosurgeons. , 1982, Neurosurgery.

[14]  V. Haughton,et al.  MR imaging of the cavernous sinus: value of spin echo and gradient recalled echo images. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  K. Mortelé,et al.  Imaging of the normal pontine cisternal segment of the abducens nerve, using three-dimensional constructive interference in the steady state MRI , 1999, Neuroradiology.

[16]  J. Casselman,et al.  Imaging of the IIIrd, IVth, and VIth cranial nerves , 1998 .

[17]  F. Umansky,et al.  The lateral wall of the cavernous sinus. With special reference to the nerves related to it. , 1982, Journal of neurosurgery.

[18]  I. Tekdemir,et al.  Duplication of the Abducens Nerve at the Petroclival Region: An Anatomic Study , 2003, Neurosurgery.

[19]  J. Dietemann,et al.  Anatomy and embryology of the lateral sellar compartment (cavernous sinus) medial wall. , 1998, Neurological research.

[20]  Marianne Dieterich,et al.  MR anatomy of the proximal cisternal segment of the trochlear nerve: neurovascular relationships and landmarks. , 2002, Radiology.

[21]  I. Tekdemir,et al.  Anatomical study of the lateral wall of the cavernous sinus, emphasizing dural construction and neural relations , 2000, Neurosurgical Review.

[22]  M. Ono,et al.  Microsurgical anatomy of the region of the tentorial incisura. , 1984, Journal of neurosurgery.

[23]  E. Kanal,et al.  Comparison of MR imaging, CT, and angiography in the evaluation of the enlarged cavernous sinus. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  V. Haughton,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the cavernous sinus. , 1985, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  A. Rhoton,et al.  Anatomy of the cavernous sinus. A microsurgical study. , 1976, Journal of neurosurgery.

[26]  F. J. Laine.  Cranial Nerves III, IV, and VI , 1996, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[27]  M Deimling,et al.  Constructive interference in steady state-3DFT MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle. , 1993, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[28]  W. Nitz,et al.  MR imaging of cranial nerve lesions using six different high-resolution T1- and T2(*)-weighted 3D and 2D sequences. , 2002, Acta radiologica.