Analysis of stereothresholds for stimuli below 2.5 c/deg

We analyze published data on disparity detection thresholds for a wide range of conditions. This type of detection changes behavior dramatically at the spatial frequency of 2.5 c/deg; above this frequency threshold remains constant while below it threshold grows at a uniform rate. Many other types of threshold, such as upper disparity limits for depth perception and threshold amplitudes for stereo and monocular motion, show similar behavior. These data lead to the postulate that there are no foveal stereo channels peaking below 2.5 c/deg, so that foveal stimuli in the whole range below 2.5 c/deg are processed by a single channel tuned to this frequency. Consequently, disparity detection thresholds at frequencies below this frequency are controlled by the single parameter of effective contrast in the 2.5 c/deg channel, whose output depends jointly on the contrast and spatial frequency of the stimuli. We develop this idea to explain the relations between spatial and contrast tuning functions for disparity thresholds. To validate our conclusions, we describe an experiment with difference-of-Gaussian stimuli over a range of interocular widths and contrast differences. For a dichoptic width ratio of 2:1, the dichoptic contrast ratio required to minimize disparity detection thresholds was 1:4, just as predicted by the model.

[1]  T. Poggio,et al.  A computational theory of human stereo vision , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[2]  Gerald Westheimer,et al.  Spatial phase sensitivity for sinusoidal grating targets , 1978, Vision Research.

[3]  C. F. Stromeyer,et al.  Low spatial-frequency channels in human vision: Adaptation and masking , 1982, Vision Research.

[4]  Clifton Schor,et al.  Interocular differences in contrast and spatial frequency: Effects on stereopsis and fusion , 1989, Vision Research.

[5]  R. Blake,et al.  Spatial frequency tuning of human stereopsis , 1991, Vision Research.

[6]  N. Graham.  Visual Pattern Analyzers , 1989 .

[7]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  A stereoscopic view of visual processing streams , 1990, Vision Research.

[8]  B. Julesz.  Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[9]  D. Tolhurst.  Separate channels for the analysis of the shape and the movement of a moving visual stimulus , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  C. Schor,et al.  Spatial tuning of static and dynamic local stereopsis , 1984, Vision Research.

[11]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Stereopsis and contrast , 1989, Vision Research.

[12]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Sensory processing of binocular disparity , 1983 .

[13]  F. W. Campbell,et al.  An explanation for the visibility of low frequency gratings , 1981, Vision Research.

[14]  Russell L. DeValois,et al.  Early Visual Processing: Feature Detection or Spatial Filtering? , 1982 .

[15]  H. Wilson,et al.  Spatial frequency tuning of orientation selective units estimated by oblique masking , 1983, Vision Research.

[16]  E. Land,et al.  Lightness and retinex theory. , 1971, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[17]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  S. Klein,et al.  Hyperacuity thresholds of 1 sec: theoretical predictions and empirical validation. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[19]  R. Blake,et al.  How Contrast Affects Stereoacuity , 1988, Perception.

[20]  C. Schor,et al.  Disparity range for local stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency , 1983, Vision Research.

[21]  G. Legge,et al.  Binocular interactions in suprathreshold contrast perception , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  R. Watt,et al.  A theory of the primitive spatial code in human vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[23]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Computational reconstruction of the mechanisms of human stereopsis , 1994, Other Conferences.