Exploring the inhibitory effect of membrane tension on cell polarization

Cell polarization toward an attractant is influenced by both physical and chemical factors. Most existing mathematical models are based on reaction-diffusion systems and only focus on the chemical process occurring during cell polarization. However, membrane tension has been shown to act as a long-range inhibitor of cell polarization. Here, we present a cell polarization model incorporating the interplay between Rac GTPase, filamentous actin (F-actin), and cell membrane tension. We further test the predictions of this model by performing single cell measurements of the spontaneous polarization of cancer stem cells (CSCs) and non-stem cancer cells (NSCCs), as the former have lower cell membrane tension. Based on both our model and the experimental results, cell polarization is more sensitive to stimuli under low membrane tension, and high membrane tension improves the robustness and stability of cell polarization such that polarization persists under random perturbations. Furthermore, our simulations are the first to recapitulate the experimental results described by Houk et al., revealing that aspiration (elevation of tension) and release (reduction of tension) result in a decrease in and recovery of the activity of Rac-GTP, respectively, and that the relaxation of tension induces new polarity of the cell body when a cell with the pseudopod-neck-body morphology is severed.

[1]  H. Meinhardt.  Models of biological pattern formation , 1982 .

[2]  Jonathon Howard,et al.  Turing's next steps: the mechanochemical basis of morphogenesis , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[3]  Ravi Iyengar,et al.  Mechanisms controlling cell size and shape during isotropic cell spreading. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[4]  David Sept,et al.  Modeling large-scale dynamic processes in the cell: polarization, waves, and division , 2014, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[5]  Manuel Théry,et al.  Simple and rapid process for single cell micro-patterning. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[6]  Weitao Chen,et al.  Modelling of Yeast Mating Reveals Robustness Strategies for Cell-Cell Interactions , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[7]  Yu Sun,et al.  Electrodeformation for single cell mechanical characterization , 2011, 2011 IEEE 24th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems.

[8]  G. Borisy,et al.  Cell Migration: Integrating Signals from Front to Back , 2003, Science.

[9]  Q. Ouyang,et al.  Dynamic equilibrium between cancer stem cells and non-stem cancer cells in human SW620 and MCF-7 cancer cell populations , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  Subra Suresh,et al.  Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[11]  Matthew F Krummel,et al.  Maintenance and modulation of T cell polarity , 2006, Nature Immunology.

[12]  Lidong Qin,et al.  Microfluidics separation reveals the stem-cell–like deformability of tumor-initiating cells , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Tobias Meyer,et al.  Synthetic Activation of Endogenous PI3K and Rac Identifies an AND-Gate Switch for Cell Polarization and Migration , 2008, PloS one.

[14]  Harikrishna Nakshatri,et al.  CD44+/CD24- breast cancer cells exhibit enhanced invasive properties: an early step necessary for metastasis , 2006, Breast Cancer Research.

[15]  M. Bornens.  Organelle positioning and cell polarity , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[16]  Manuel Théry,et al.  Anisotropy of cell adhesive microenvironment governs cell internal organization and orientation of polarity , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  A. Ridley.  Rho GTPases and actin dynamics in membrane protrusions and vesicle trafficking. , 2006, Trends in cell biology.

[18]  R. Hochmuth,et al.  Micropipette aspiration of living cells. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  Wouter-Jan Rappel,et al.  Computational model for cell morphodynamics. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[20]  S. Desmond Smith,et al.  Exploring the possibility of early cataract diagnostics based on tryptophan fluorescence , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[21]  J. Vörös,et al.  An aqueous-based surface modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane) with poly(ethylene glycol) to prevent biofouling. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[22]  A. Linstedt,et al.  Golgi positioning. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[23]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Cell Spreading and Lamellipodial Extension Rate Is Regulated by Membrane Tension , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  D E Ingber,et al.  Control of cytoskeletal mechanics by extracellular matrix, cell shape, and mechanical tension. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[25]  C. Luo,et al.  Degassing-assisted patterning of cell culture surfaces. , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[26]  Qing Nie,et al.  Noise filtering tradeoffs in spatial gradient sensing and cell polarization response , 2011, BMC Systems Biology.

[27]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Wave-pinning and cell polarity from a bistable reaction-diffusion system. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[28]  Daniel A. Fletcher,et al.  Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton , 2010, Nature.

[29]  Qing Nie,et al.  Signaling regulated endocytosis and exocytosis lead to mating pheromone concentration dependent morphologies in yeast , 2012, FEBS letters.

[30]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  A Comparison of Mathematical Models for Polarization of Single Eukaryotic Cells in Response to Guided Cues , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[31]  Kinneret Keren,et al.  Cell motility: the integrating role of the plasma membrane , 2011, European Biophysics Journal.

[32]  Axel Voigt,et al.  A DIFFUSE-INTERFACE APPROACH FOR MODELING TRANSPORT, DIFFUSION AND ADSORPTION/DESORPTION OF MATERIAL QUANTITIES ON A DEFORMABLE INTERFACE. , 2009, Communications in mathematical sciences.

[33]  A. Jimeno,et al.  More than Markers: Biological Significance of Cancer Stem Cell-Defining Molecules , 2010, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[34]  G. Bokoch,et al.  Characterization of Rac and Cdc42 Activation in Chemoattractant-stimulated Human Neutrophils Using a Novel Assay for Active GTPases* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Eukaryotic Chemotaxis: Distinctions between Directional Sensing and Polarization* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[36]  Falko Ziebert,et al.  Model for self-polarization and motility of keratocyte fragments , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[37]  Joanna E. Huddleston.  DNA repair: BRCA2 gets protective at forks , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[38]  D. Purich,et al.  Diffusion rate limitations in actin-based propulsion of hard and deformable particles. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[39]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Phosphoinositides and Rho proteins spatially regulate actin polymerization to initiate and maintain directed movement in a one-dimensional model of a motile cell. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[40]  A. Carlsson,et al.  Feedback mechanisms in a mechanical model of cell polarization , 2014, Physical biology.

[41]  A P Pisano,et al.  Deformation measurement of individual cells in large populations using a single-cell microchamber array chip. , 2012, Applied physics letters.

[42]  Alba Diz-Muñoz,et al.  Use the force: membrane tension as an organizer of cell shape and motility. , 2013, Trends in cell biology.

[43]  A. Mogilner,et al.  The physics of filopodial protrusion. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[44]  A. Mogilner,et al.  Model of polarization and bistability of cell fragments. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[45]  Wouter-Jan Rappel,et al.  Coupling actin flow, adhesion, and morphology in a computational cell motility model , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Frederick Sachs,et al.  Actin stress in cell reprogramming , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  S. Kellokumpu,et al.  Abnormal glycosylation and altered Golgi structure in colorectal cancer: dependence on intra‐Golgi pH , 2002, FEBS letters.

[48]  Q. Du,et al.  Modelling and simulations of multi-component lipid membranes and open membranes via diffuse interface approaches , 2006, Journal of Mathematical Biology.

[49]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Membrane Tension Maintains Cell Polarity by Confining Signals to the Leading Edge during Neutrophil Migration , 2012, Cell.

[50]  Shu Chien,et al.  Effects of cell tension on the small GTPase Rac , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[51]  C S Peskin,et al.  Cellular motions and thermal fluctuations: the Brownian ratchet. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[52]  Zhi-Ping Liu,et al.  Network screening of Goto-Kakizaki rat liver microarray data during diabetic progression , 2011, BMC Systems Biology.

[53]  Erin L. Barnhart,et al.  Membrane Tension in Rapidly Moving Cells Is Determined by Cytoskeletal Forces , 2013, Current Biology.

[54]  Richard A. Firtel,et al.  Localized Ras signaling at the leading edge regulates PI3K, cell polarity, and directional cell movement , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[55]  Fei Wang.  The signaling mechanisms underlying cell polarity and chemotaxis. , 2009, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[56]  L Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Regimes of wave type patterning driven by refractory actin feedback: transition from static polarization to dynamic wave behaviour , 2012, Physical biology.

[57]  K. Kaibuchi,et al.  Roles of Rho-family GTPases in cell polarisation and directional migration. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[58]  Paul Herzmark,et al.  Lipid products of PI(3)Ks maintain persistent cell polarity and directed motility in neutrophils , 2002, Nature Cell Biology.

[59]  H. Meinhardt.  Orientation of chemotactic cells and growth cones: models and mechanisms. , 1999, Journal of cell science.

[60]  George Oster,et al.  Force generation by actin polymerization II: the elastic ratchet and tethered filaments. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[61]  Olivier Hamant,et al.  The mechanics behind cell polarity. , 2012, Trends in cell biology.

[62]  A. Linstedt,et al.  A primary role for Golgi positioning in directed secretion, cell polarity, and wound healing. , 2009, Molecular biology of the cell.

[63]  D. L. Taylor,et al.  The actin-based nanomachine at the leading edge of migrating cells. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[64]  Chert,et al.  Applications of semi-implicit Fourier-spectral method to phase field equations , 2004 .

[65]  Daniel Kalman,et al.  Rac and Cdc42 play distinct roles in regulating PI(3,4,5)P3 and polarity during neutrophil chemotaxis , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[66]  P. Iglesias,et al.  Two complementary, local excitation, global inhibition mechanisms acting in parallel can explain the chemoattractant-induced regulation of PI(3,4,5)P3 response in dictyostelium cells. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[67]  C. McCulloch,et al.  Partners in Protection: Interdependence of Cytoskeleton and Plasma Membrane in Adaptations to Applied Forces , 2000, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[68]  A. Mogilner,et al.  Cell Polarity: Quantitative Modeling as a Tool in Cell Biology , 2012, Science.

[69]  A. Levchenko,et al.  Models of eukaryotic gradient sensing: application to chemotaxis of amoebae and neutrophils. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[70]  S. Grill,et al.  Cell polarity: mechanochemical patterning. , 2013, Trends in cell biology.

[71]  R. Weinberg,et al.  A Perspective on Cancer Cell Metastasis , 2011, Science.

[72]  Shuji Ishihara,et al.  A Mass Conserved Reaction–Diffusion System Captures Properties of Cell Polarity , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[73]  M. Textor,et al.  Surface engineering approaches to micropattern surfaces for cell-based assays. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[74]  Marten Postma,et al.  Chemotaxis: signalling modules join hands at front and tail , 2004, EMBO reports.

[75]  Danila Coradini,et al.  Isolation and in vitro propagation of tumorigenic breast cancer cells with stem/progenitor cell properties. , 2005, Cancer research.