Passenger head kinematics in abrupt braking and lane change events

Abstract Objective: A test track study was conducted to quantify patterns of adult front seat passenger head motion during abrupt vehicle maneuvers. Method: Eighty-seven men and women with a wide range of body sizes and ages participated in data collection on a closed test track in a passenger sedan under manual control by a test driver. Because a primary goal of the study was to gather “unaware” data, the participants were instructed that the study was concerned with vehicle dynamics and they were required to read from a questionnaire taped to the top of their thighs as the drive began. The first event was a hard brake (approximately 1 g) to a stop from 35 mph (56 kph). Within the space of approximately 5 min the participants also experienced an aggressive lane change, a sharp right turn with simultaneous hard braking, and a second hard braking event. A Microsoft Kinect v2 sensor was positioned to view the area around the front passenger seat. Head location was tracked using the Kinect data with a novel methodology that fit 3D head scan data to the depth data acquired in the vehicle. Result: The mean (standard deviation) forward excursion of the estimated head center of gravity (CG) location in the first braking event was 135 (62) mm. The forward head CG excursion in the second braking event of 115 (51) mm was significantly less than that in the first, but the difference was small relative to the within-condition variance. Head excursion on the second braking trial was less than that on the first trial for 69% of participants. The mean maximum inboard head excursion in lane-change maneuvers was 118 (40) mm. Forward head excursions in braking were significantly smaller for older passengers and those with higher body mass index, but the combined factors accounted for less than 25% of the variance. Inboard head excursion in the lane-change event was significantly related to stature, but only about 7% of variance was related to body size. Head excursions for men and women did not differ significantly after accounting for body size. Discussion: This is the first quantitative occupant dynamics study to use a large, diverse sample of passengers, enabling the exploration of the effects of covariates such as age and body size. Conclusions: The data demonstrate that a relatively large range of head positions can be expected to result from abrupt vehicle maneuvers. The data do not support simple scaling of excursions based on body size.

[1]  Karin Brolin,et al.  Driver kinematic and muscle responses in braking events with standard and reversible pre-tensioned restraints: validation data for human models. , 2013, Stapp car crash journal.

[2]  Richard Morris,et al.  Improved Understanding of Passenger Behaviour During Pre-Impact Events to Aid Smart Restraint Development , 2005 .

[3]  Karin Brolin,et al.  Passenger Kinematics and Muscle Responses in Autonomous Braking Events with Standard and Reversible Pre‐tensioned Restraints , 2013 .

[4]  Lotta Jakobsson,et al.  An Examination of Pre-crash Braking Influence on Occupant Crash Response Using an Active Human Body Model , 2016 .

[5]  Jac Wismans,et al.  The Occupant Response to Autonomous Braking: A Modeling Approach That Accounts for Active Musculature , 2012, Traffic injury prevention.

[6]  Jessica B. Cicchino,et al.  Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Matthew P. Reed,et al.  In-Vehicle Occupant Head Tracking Using aLow-Cost Depth Camera , 2018 .

[8]  Kristy B Arbogast,et al.  Kinematics and shoulder belt position of child rear seat passengers during vehicle maneuvers. , 2011, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[9]  Karin Brolin,et al.  A Human Body Model With Active Muscles for Simulation of Pretensioned Restraints in Autonomous Braking Interventions , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[10]  Susumu Ejima,et al.  Prediction of Pre-Impact Occupant Kinematic Behavior Based on the Muscle Activity During Frontal Collision , 2009 .

[11]  Frederic Robache,et al.  Determination of pre-impact occupant postures and analysis of consequences on injury outcome. Part I: a driving simulator study. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Wolfgang Sinz,et al.  Factors influencing occupant kinematics during braking and lane change maneuvers in a passenger vehicle , 2014 .

[13]  Stefan Kirschbichler,et al.  Passenger Kinematics in Braking, Lane Change and Oblique Driving Maneuvers , 2015 .

[14]  Karl-Heinz Baumann,et al.  The Efficiency of PRE-SAFE®Systems in Pre-braked FrontalCollision Situations , 2011 .

[15]  Johan Davidsson,et al.  Volunteer occupant kinematics during driver initiated and autonomous braking when driving in real traffic environments , 2011 .

[16]  Sang Min Lee,et al.  The AEB System with Active and Passive Safety Integration for Reducing Occupants' Injuries in High-Velocity Region , 2015 .

[17]  Yuko Nakahira,et al.  Development of a human body finite element model with multiple muscles and their controller for estimating occupant motions and impact responses in frontal crash situations. , 2012, Stapp car crash journal.