OSCILLATOR: A system for analysis of diurnal leaf growth using infrared photography combined with wavelet transformation

BackgroundQuantification of leaf movement is an important tool for characterising the effects of environmental signals and the circadian clock on plant development. Analysis of leaf movement is currently restricted by the attachment of sensors to the plant or dependent upon visible light for time-lapse photography. The study of leaf growth movement rhythms in mature plants under biological relevant conditions, e.g. diurnal light and dark conditions, is therefore problematic.ResultsHere we present OSCILLATOR, an affordable system for the analysis of rhythmic leaf growth movement in mature plants. The system contains three modules: (1) Infrared time-lapse imaging of growing mature plants (2) measurement of projected distances between leaf tip and plant apex (leaf tip tracking growth-curves) and (3) extraction of phase, period and amplitude of leaf growth oscillations using wavelet analysis. A proof-of-principle is provided by characterising parameters of rhythmic leaf growth movement of different Arabidopsis thaliana accessions as well as of Petunia hybrida and Solanum lycopersicum plants under diurnal conditions. The amplitude of leaf oscillations correlated to published data on leaf angles, while amplitude and leaf length did not correlate, suggesting a distinct leaf growth profile for each accession. Arabidopsis mutant accession Landsberg erecta displayed a late phase (timing of peak oscillation) compared to other accessions and this trait appears unrelated to the ERECTA locus.ConclusionsOSCILLATOR is a low cost and easy to implement system that can accurately and reproducibly quantify rhythmic growth of mature plants for different species under diurnal light/dark cycling.

[1]  G. Rédei.  Supervital Mutants of Arabidopsis. , 1962, Genetics.

[2]  R. Halaban,et al.  The Circadian Rhythm of Leaf Movement of Coleus blumei x C. frederici, a Short Day Plant. II. The Effects of Light and Temperature Signals. , 1968, Plant physiology.

[3]  W. Engelmann,et al.  Leaf Movement Rhythm In Arabidopsis Thaliana , 1992 .

[4]  N. Mitsukawa,et al.  The Arabidopsis ERECTA gene encodes a putative receptor protein kinase with extracellular leucine-rich repeats. , 1996, The Plant cell.

[5]  S. Kay,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Drosophila period Gene Transcription in Living Animals , 1997, Journal of biological rhythms.

[6]  A. Millar,et al.  Circadian dysfunction causes aberrant hypocotyl elongation patterns in Arabidopsis. , 1999, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[7]  R. Amasino,et al.  Natural allelic variation identifies new genes in the Arabidopsis circadian system. , 1999, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[8]  C. R. McClung,et al.  Enhanced Fitness Conferred by Naturally Occurring Variation in the Circadian Clock , 2003, Science.

[9]  T. Hoshizaki,et al.  Photoelectric device for recording of leaf movements , 1970, Space life sciences.

[10]  Brad M. Binder,et al.  Arabidopsis Seedling Growth Response and Recovery to Ethylene. A Kinetic Analysis1 , 2004, Plant Physiology.

[11]  M. Ishiura,et al.  Large-scale screening of Arabidopsis circadian clock mutants by a high-throughput real-time bioluminescence monitoring system. , 2004, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[12]  Frank F. Millenaar,et al.  Ethylene-Induced Differential Growth of Petioles in Arabidopsis. Analyzing Natural Variation, Response Kinetics, and Regulation1 , 2005, Plant Physiology.

[13]  P. Koumoutsakos,et al.  Feature point tracking and trajectory analysis for video imaging in cell biology. , 2005, Journal of structural biology.

[14]  C. Robertson McClung,et al.  Plant Circadian Rhythms , 2006, The Plant Cell Online.

[15]  J. Benschop,et al.  Abscisic Acid Antagonizes Ethylene-Induced Hyponastic Growth in Arabidopsis1[OA] , 2006, Plant Physiology.

[16]  Cynthia Weinig,et al.  Shade avoidance and the regulation of leaf inclination in Arabidopsis. , 2006, Plant, cell & environment.

[17]  K. Chenu,et al.  PHENOPSIS, an automated platform for reproducible phenotyping of plant responses to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana permitted the identification of an accession with low sensitivity to soil water deficit. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[18]  Ezio Rosato,et al.  Circadian rhythms : methods and protocols , 2007 .

[19]  Andrew J Millar,et al.  Analysis of circadian leaf movement rhythms in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2007, Methods in molecular biology.

[20]  Stacey L. Harmer,et al.  Rhythmic growth explained by coincidence between internal and external cues , 2007, Nature.

[21]  John B. Hogenesch,et al.  WAVECLOCK: wavelet analysis of circadian oscillation , 2008, Bioinform..

[22]  J. Stinchcombe,et al.  A latitudinal cline and response to vernalization in leaf angle and morphology in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). , 2008, The New phytologist.

[23]  S. Munné-Bosch,et al.  Hyponastic leaf growth decreases the photoprotective demand, prevents damage to photosystem II and delays leaf senescence in Salvia broussonetii plants. , 2008, Physiologia plantarum.

[24]  M. van Zanten,et al.  Ethylene-induced hyponastic growth in Arabidopsis thaliana is controlled by ERECTA. , 2010, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[25]  J. Janssen,et al.  On the Relevance and Control of Leaf Angle , 2010 .

[26]  Ulrich Schurr,et al.  Diel time-courses of leaf growth in monocot and dicot species: endogenous rhythms and temperature effects , 2010, Journal of experimental botany.

[27]  B. Muller,et al.  Control of Leaf Expansion: A Developmental Switch from Metabolics to Hydraulics1[W][OA] , 2011, Plant Physiology.

[28]  J. Borevitz,et al.  Natural Genetic Variation for Growth and Development Revealed by High-Throughput Phenotyping in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2012, G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics.

[29]  A. Hetherington,et al.  High temperature exposure increases plant cooling capacity , 2012, Current Biology.

[30]  Winfried S Peters,et al.  Tailor-made composite functions as tools in model choice: the case of sigmoidal vs bi-linear growth profiles , 2006, Plant Methods.