Efficient Behavior-consistent Calibration for Multi-agent Market Simulation

Order-driven market simulation mimics the trader behaviors to generate order streams to support interactive studies of financial strategies. In market simulator, the multi-agent approach is commonly adopted due to its explainability. Existing multi-agent systems employ heuristic search to generate order streams, which is inefficient for large-scale simulation. Furthermore, the search-based behavior calibration often leads to inconsistent trader actions under the same general market condition, making the simulation results unstable and difficult to interpret. We propose CaliSim, the first search-free calibration approach multi-agent market simulator which achieves large-scale efficiency and behavior consistency. CaliSim uses meta-learning and devises a surrogate trading system with a consistency loss function for the reproducibility of order stream and trader behaviors. Extensive experiments in the market replay and case studies show that CaliSim achieves state-of-the-art in terms of order stream reproduction with consistent trader behavior and can capture patterns of real markets.

[1]  Y. Liu,et al.  DSLOB: A Synthetic Limit Order Book Dataset for Benchmarking Forecasting Algorithms under Distributional Shift , 2022, ArXiv.

[2]  T. Balch,et al.  Learning to simulate realistic limit order book markets from data as a World Agent , 2022, ICAIF.

[3]  Xiao-Yang Liu,et al.  Deep Reinforcement Learning for Cryptocurrency Trading: Practical Approach to Address Backtest Overfitting , 2022, ArXiv.

[4]  J. Cartlidge,et al.  State Dependent Parallel Neural Hawkes Process for Limit Order Book Event Stream Prediction and Simulation , 2022, KDD.

[5]  J. Bian,et al.  Multi-Granularity Residual Learning with Confidence Estimation for Time Series Prediction , 2022, WWW.

[6]  Shueng-Han Gary Chan,et al.  TVConv: Efficient Translation Variant Convolution for Layout-aware Visual Processing , 2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[7]  Zhaoran Wang,et al.  FinRL-Meta: A Universe of Near-Real Market Environments for Data-Driven Deep Reinforcement Learning in Quantitative Finance , 2021, ArXiv.

[8]  H. Lam,et al.  Efficient Calibration of Multi-Agent Simulation Models from Output Series with Bayesian Optimization , 2021, ICAIF.

[9]  Le Wu,et al.  Stock Trend Prediction with Multi-granularity Data: A Contrastive Learning Approach with Adaptive Fusion , 2021, CIKM.

[10]  Novella Bartolini,et al.  Towards realistic market simulations: a generative adversarial networks approach , 2021, ICAIF.

[11]  Svitlana Vyetrenko,et al.  Learning who is in the market from time series: market participant discovery through adversarial calibration of multi-agent simulators , 2021, ArXiv.

[12]  Zijian Shi,et al.  The Limit Order Book Recreation Model (LOBRM): An Extended Analysis , 2021, ECML/PKDD.

[13]  Derya Birant,et al.  Machine learning and data mining in manufacturing , 2021, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  C. J. Schinas,et al.  Optimization of Backtesting Techniques in Automated High Frequency Trading Systems Using the d-Backtest PS Method , 2020 .

[15]  Samuel A. Assefa Generating synthetic data in finance: opportunities, challenges and pitfalls , 2020, ICAIF.

[16]  Chen Wang,et al.  Multi-agent reinforcement learning in a realistic limit order book market simulation , 2020, ICAIF.

[17]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Generating Realistic Stock Market Order Streams , 2020, AAAI.

[18]  D. Schoenmaker,et al.  A Finance Approach to Climate Stress Testing , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[19]  Manuela Veloso,et al.  Get real: realism metrics for robust limit order book market simulations , 2019, ICAIF.

[20]  Haruna Isah,et al.  Stock Market Analysis: A Review and Taxonomy of Prediction Techniques , 2019, International Journal of Financial Studies.

[21]  Maria Hybinette,et al.  ABIDES: Towards High-Fidelity Market Simulation for AI Research , 2019, ArXiv.

[22]  K. Maddulety,et al.  Machine Learning in Banking Risk Management: A Literature Review , 2019, Risks.

[23]  J. Rouchier,et al.  Trading Volume and Price Distortion: An Agent-Based Model with Heterogenous Knowledge of Fundamentals , 2018 .

[24]  Campbell R. Harvey,et al.  Backtesting , 2015, The Journal of Portfolio Management.

[25]  Kevin Dowd,et al.  Back‐Testing Market Risk Models , 2012 .

[26]  Stacy Williams,et al.  Limit order books , 2010, 1012.0349.

[27]  C. Chiarella,et al.  Asset Price and Wealth Dynamics in a Financial Market with Heterogeneous Agents , 2006 .

[28]  Carl Chiarella,et al.  The Impact of Heterogeneous Trading Rules on the Limit Order Book and Order Flows , 2004, 0711.3581.

[29]  Eli Feinerman,et al.  Risk and Probability Premiums for CARA Utility Functions , 1993 .

[30]  D. Skovmand Risk Management and Simulation , 2014 .

[31]  James Porter,et al.  Agent-Based Modelling for Financial Markets , 2012 .