Diagnostic reference levels and complexity indices in interventional radiology: a national programme

AbstractObjectivesTo propose national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for interventional radiology and to evaluate the impact of the procedural complexity on patient doses.MethodsEight interventional radiology units from Spanish hospitals were involved in this project. The participants agreed to undergo common quality control procedures for X-ray systems. Kerma area product (KAP) was collected from a sample of 1,649 procedures. A consensus document established the criteria to evaluate the complexity of seven types of procedures. DRLs were set as the 3rd quartile of KAP values.ResultsThe KAP (3rd quartile) in Gy cm2 for the procedures included in the survey were: lower extremity arteriography (n = 784) 78; renal arteriography (n = 37) 107; transjugular hepatic biopsies (THB) (n = 30) 45; biliary drainage (BD) (n = 314) 30; uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) (n = 56) 214; colon endoprostheses (CE) (n = 31) 169; hepatic chemoembolization (HC) (n = 269) 303; femoropopliteal revascularization (FR) (n = 62) 119; and iliac stent (n = 66) 170. The complexity involved the increases in the following KAP factors from simple to complex procedures: THB x4; BD x13; UFE x3; CE x3; HC x5; FR x5 and IS x4.ConclusionsThe evaluation of the procedure complexity in patient doses will allow the proper use of DRLs for the optimization of interventional radiology.Key Points• National DRLs for interventional procedures have been proposed given level of complexity • For clinical audits, the level of complexity should be taken into account. • An evaluation of the complexity levels of the procedure should be made.

[1]  E. Vañó,et al.  Clinical and technical determinants of the complexity of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures: Analysis in relation to radiation exposure parameters , 2000, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[2]  E Vañó,et al.  Patient dose related to the complexity of interventional cardiology procedures. , 2001, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[3]  P. Schnyder,et al.  How to set up and apply reference levels in fluoroscopy at a national level , 2007, European Radiology.

[4]  H. Bosmans,et al.  The SENTINEL project. , 2008, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[5]  Madan M. Rehani,et al.  ICRP Publication 121: Radiological Protection in Paediatric Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology , 2013, Annals of the ICRP.

[6]  Daniel K. Powell,et al.  Radiation protection in interventional radiology: survey results of attitudes and use. , 2013, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[7]  Donald L. Miller,et al.  Management of Patient and Staff Radiation Dose in Interventional Radiology: Current Concepts , 2014, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[8]  Importance of Dose Settings in the X-Ray Systems Used for Interventional Radiology: A National Survey , 2009, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[9]  G. Reitz,et al.  ICRP Publication 123: Assessment of Radiation Exposure of Astronauts in Space , 2013 .

[10]  H. Järvinen,et al.  A national patient dose survey and setting of reference levels for interventional radiology in Bulgaria , 2012, European Radiology.

[11]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[12]  R. Ruiz-Cruces,et al.  Patient dose in radiologically guided interventional vascular procedures: conventional versus digital systems. , 1997, Radiology.

[13]  Patient Dosimetry for X Rays Used in Medical Imaging , 2005 .

[14]  ICRP Publication 105. Radiation protection in medicine. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[15]  F. J. Díaz Romero,et al.  Estimation of effective dose in some digital angiographic and interventional procedures. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  E. Vañó,et al.  Patient Dose Reference Levels for Interventional Radiology: A National Approach , 2009, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[17]  Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging: review and additional advice. , 2001, Annals of the ICRP.

[18]  European Society of Radiology.  ESR statement on radiation protection: globalisation, personalised medicine and safety (the GPS approach) , 2013, Insights into Imaging.

[19]  Jack Valentin,et al.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[20]  J. Schneider,et al.  Radiation Exposure in Nonvascular Fluoroscopy-Guided Interventional Procedures , 2012, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[21]  C J Martin,et al.  ICRP Publication 113. Education and training in radiological protection for diagnostic and interventional procedures. , 2009, Annals of the ICRP.

[22]  Radiological protection and safety in medicine , 1996 .

[23]  Icrp.  Comprar ICRP Publication 37:Cost-Benefit Analysis in the Optimization of Radiation Protection,37 | ICRP | 9780080298177 | Elsevier , 2007 .

[24]  Adrian K. Dixon,et al.  Benefits and costs, an eternal balance , 2007 .

[25]  J. Valentin,et al.  Abstract: Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures, ICRP Publication 85 , 2000 .

[26]  R. Vetter.  ICRP Publication 103, The Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection , 2008 .

[27]  Icrp.  Chapters 3 and 4 , 2007 .

[28]  R. Nowotny,et al.  A pilot study exploring the possibility of establishing guidance levels in x-ray directed interventional procedures. , 2008, Medical physics.

[29]  Donald L. Miller,et al.  Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study: part I: overall measures of dose. , 2003, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.