On the estimation of continuous mappings from cradle-style to 6-axis machines for face-milled hypoid gear generation

Abstract Modern Computer Numerically Controlled (CNC) machines for grinding face-milled hypoid and spiral bevel gears have six axes and are able to perform complex motions with almost free-form ease-off topography correction capabilities. However, in the gear literature and in the common practice machine-settings, corrections are usually performed within the classical cradle-style framework. We believe that, working in the 6-axis framework, may have advantages with respect to correction performances, and numerical conditioning of the resulting optimization problem. However, since for historical and practical reasons basic kinematic settings are usually given within the cradle-style framework, an imperative intermediate step is the translation of the cradle-style kinematics into the 6-axis (minimal) layout. Therefore, in this paper the estimation of the continuous mappings from the cradle-style to the 6-axis kinematics is investigated. In particular, the performances of two methods are assessed: (i) an existing central difference method (CDM) approach, and (ii) an original Least Squares Method (LSM) approach. Numerical results show that the LSM approach presents some advantages over the CDM approach in terms of accuracy of the reconstructed surface, numerical stability, and ease of implementation.

[1]  D. Zwillinger Handbook of differential equations , 1990 .

[2]  Janusz,et al.  Geometrical Methods in Robotics , 1996, Monographs in Computer Science.

[3]  Qi Fan,et al.  Higher-Order Tooth Flank Form Error Correction for Face-Milled Spiral Bevel and Hypoid Gears , 2008 .

[4]  Aizoh Kubo,et al.  Identification of the Machine Settings of Real Hypoid Gear Tooth Surfaces , 1998 .

[5]  Massimo Guiggiani,et al.  Optimization of the Loaded Contact Pattern in Hypoid Gears by Automatic Topography Modification , 2009 .

[6]  Yi-Pei Shih,et al.  Flank Correction for Spiral Bevel and Hypoid Gears on a Six-Axis CNC Hypoid Generator , 2008 .

[7]  Zhang-Hua Fong,et al.  Mathematical Model of Universal Hypoid Generator With Supplemental Kinematic Flank Correction Motions , 2000 .

[8]  F. Litvin,et al.  Gear geometry and applied theory , 1994 .

[9]  Marco Gabiccini A twist exponential approach to gear generation with general spatial motions , 2009 .

[10]  F. Park Computational aspects of the product-of-exponentials formula for robot kinematics , 1994, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[11]  Massimo Guiggiani,et al.  Robust Optimization of the Loaded Contact Pattern in Hypoid Gears With Uncertain Misalignments , 2010 .

[12]  Vilmos Simon Optimal Tooth Modifications in Hypoid Gears , 2005 .

[13]  Uwe Gaiser,et al.  The Ultimate Motion Graph , 2000 .

[14]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation , 1994 .

[15]  Yi-Pei Shih,et al.  Flank Modification Methodology for Face-Hobbing Hypoid Gears Based on Ease-Off Topography , 2007 .

[16]  Philip E. Gill,et al.  Practical optimization , 1981 .

[17]  Adi Ben-Israel,et al.  Generalized inverses: theory and applications , 1974 .