Engineering the Black-Box Meta Model of Data Exploration

With an increasing amount and diversity of available data, data exploration is becoming critical for many businesses to create insights for business innovation. From an analysis and design perspective, however, data exploration is still dominated by IT-oriented modeling concepts that make it difficult to engage business users because they are not used to think in terms of (even conceptual) data structures, but rather in terms of business questions, intended insights, decision context, information quality, etc. This study elaborates requirements for conceptualizing data exploration from a business perspective, discusses to what extent existing business-oriented conceptualizations fulfil such requirements, and consolidates promising modeling concepts into a meta model proposal that links purpose, context, domain knowledge, exploration history, business question, available data, user, decision, business insight, presentation and non-user stakeholder as key concepts. The meta model is demonstrated by instantiating it to conceptualize five exemplary data exploration use cases, and first evaluative evidence is presented. The paper closes with a discussion how to transform the proposed meta model into an innovative data exploration analysis and design tool.

[1]  Inna Kouper,et al.  The Centrality of Data: Data Lifecycle and Data Pipelines , 2017 .

[2]  Rahul C. Basole,et al.  Designing Breadth-Oriented Data Exploration for Mitigating Cognitive Biases , 2018, Cognitive Biases in Visualizations.

[3]  Michelle X. Zhou,et al.  Characterizing Users' Visual Analytic Activity for Insight Provenance , 2008, 2008 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.

[4]  Kurt Geihs,et al.  A Comprehensive Context Modeling Framework for Pervasive Computing Systems , 2008, DAIS.

[5]  Hong Fan,et al.  A Visualization Approach to Air Pollution Data Exploration—A Case Study of Air Quality Index (PM2.5) in Beijing, China , 2016 .

[6]  Yves Pigneur,et al.  Designing Tools for Collectively Solving Ill-Structured Problems , 2018, HICSS.

[7]  Steve G. Sutton,et al.  Enhancing the Business Value of Business Intelligence: The Role of Shared Knowledge and Assimilation , 2013, J. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[9]  Duen-Ren Liu,et al.  Discovering competitive intelligence by mining changes in patent trends , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Yves Pigneur,et al.  Business Model Generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers and challengers , 2010 .

[11]  Ulrich Frank,et al.  Multi-perspective enterprise modeling: foundational concepts, prospects and future research challenges , 2014, Software & Systems Modeling.

[12]  Nikolaus Forgó,et al.  The Principle of Purpose Limitation and Big Data , 2017, New Technology, Big Data and the Law.

[13]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact , 2012, MIS Q..

[14]  Mohammed El Mohajir,et al.  CMCD: A data warehouse modeling framework based on goals and business process models , 2017, 2017 IEEE AFRICON.

[15]  Robert Winter,et al.  Blackboxing Data - Conceptualizing Data-Driven Exploration from a Business Perspective , 2019, The Art of Structuring.

[16]  Alireza Pourshahid,et al.  Toward a Goal-Oriented, Business Intelligence Decision-Making Framework , 2011, MCETECH.

[17]  Carsten Binnig,et al.  Towards a Benchmark for Interactive Data Exploration , 2016, IEEE Data Eng. Bull..

[18]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Strategic business modeling: representation and reasoning , 2014, Software & Systems Modeling.

[19]  Daqi Zhao - Frontiers of Big Data Business Analytics: Patterns and Cases in Online Marketing , 2016 .

[20]  Steven F. Roth,et al.  Enhancing data exploration with a branching history of user operations , 2001, Knowl. Based Syst..

[21]  Gerd Wagner,et al.  Conceptual modeling: Definition, purpose and benefits , 2015, 2015 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[22]  Q Shao,et al.  Statistical visualization for data exploration: a case study on Sydney Olympic Park. , 2003, Chemosphere.

[23]  Gary Klein,et al.  A Naturalistic Study of Insight , 2011 .

[24]  Alisa Sotsenko A Rich Context Model : Design and Implementation , 2017 .

[25]  Boris Otto,et al.  Management of the master data lifecycle: a framework for analysis , 2013, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[26]  Marko Bohanec,et al.  Decision-making framework with double-loop learning through interpretable black-box machine learning models , 2017, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[27]  Daniel Schwabe,et al.  Frameworks for Information Exploration - A Case Study , 2015, IESD@ISWC.

[28]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  A taxonomy of visualization techniques using the data state reference model , 2000, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2000. INFOVIS 2000. Proceedings.

[29]  Taizan Chan,et al.  Defining and Conceptualizing Actionable Insight: A Conceptual Framework for Decision-centric Analytics , 2016, ACIS.

[30]  Melanie Tory,et al.  Visualizing Dimension Coverage to Support Exploratory Analysis , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[31]  T. Davenport,et al.  Data to Knowledge to Results: Building an Analytic Capability , 2001 .

[32]  Richard D. De Veaux,et al.  Applying statistical thinking to ‘Big Data’ problems , 2014 .

[33]  Hunter Whitney Data Insights: New Ways to Visualize and Make Sense of Data , 2012 .

[34]  Daniel Bumblauskas,et al.  Big data analytics: transforming data to action , 2017, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[35]  M. El Arass,et al.  Data lifecycles analysis: Towards intelligent cycle , 2017, 2017 Intelligent Systems and Computer Vision (ISCV).

[36]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Emerging trends in business analytics , 2002, CACM.

[37]  Eric S. K. Yu,et al.  Business-driven data analytics: A conceptual modeling framework , 2018, Data Knowl. Eng..

[38]  Alexander Osterwalder,et al.  The business model ontology a proposition in a design science approach , 2004 .

[39]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  Cross-boundary teaming for innovation: Integrating research on teams and knowledge in organizations , 2017, Human Resource Management Review.