A Usability Checklist for the Usability Evaluation of Mobile Phone User Interface

In the last decade, the research of the usability of mobile phones has been a newly evolving area with few established methodologies and realistic practices that ensure capturing usability in evaluation. Thus, there exists growing demand to explore appropriate evaluation methodologies that evaluate the usability of mobile phones quickly as well as comprehensively. This study aims to develop a task-based usability checklist based on heuristic evaluations in views of mobile phone user interface (UI) practitioners. A hierarchical structure of UI design elements and usability principles related to mobile phones were developed and then utilized to develop the checklist. To demonstrate the practical effectiveness of the proposed checklist, comparative experiments were conducted on the usability checklist and usability testing. The majority of usability problems found by usability testing and additional problems were discovered by the proposed checklist. It is expected that the usability checklist proposed in this study could be used quickly and efficiently by usability practitioners to evaluate the mobile phone UI in the middle of the mobile phone development process.

[1]  Timo Jokela,et al.  When good things happen to bad products: where are the benefits of usability in the consumer appliance market? , 2004, INTR.

[2]  Connor Graham,et al.  A Review of Mobile HCI Research Methods , 2003, Mobile HCI.

[3]  Claire Paddison,et al.  Applying heuristics to perform a rigorous accessibility inspection in a commercial context , 2002, CUU '03.

[4]  Ebba Þóra Hvannberg,et al.  Analysis of strategies for improving and estimating the effectiveness of heuristic evaluation , 2004, NordiCHI '04.

[5]  E. Coiera.  Interaction Design , 2002 .

[6]  Elizabeth J. Simeral,et al.  Comparative analysis of heuristic and usability evaluation methods , 1997 .

[7]  Ebba Þóra Hvannberg,et al.  Basic concepts , 2020, Fluid Flow in Porous Media.

[8]  Jamea C. HoCreskey,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INSTRUMENT FOR MEASURING , 2008 .

[9]  Timo Jokela,et al.  The standard of user-centered design and the standard definition of usability: analyzing ISO 13407 against ISO 9241-11 , 2003, CLIHC '03.

[10]  Søren Lauesen,et al.  Six Styles for Usability Requirements , 1998, REFSQ.

[11]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Coordinating Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: A Review of Research Issues and Strategies , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[12]  W. Buxton.  Human-Computer Interaction , 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[13]  N. Kano,et al.  Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality , 1984 .

[14]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Usability Evaluation , 2001 .

[15]  JokelaTimo.  When good things happen to bad products , 2004 .

[16]  David A. Carr,et al.  Usability of mobile phones , 2003 .

[17]  Robert C. Williges,et al.  Criteria For Evaluating Usability Evaluation Methods , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[18]  Siegfried Treu.  User Interface Evaluation: A Structured Approach , 1994 .

[19]  Robin Jeffries,et al.  Usability testing vs. heuristic evaluation: was there a contest? , 1992, SGCH.

[20]  Jan Stage,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Techniques for Usability Testing of Mobile Systems in a Laboratory Setting , 2003 .

[21]  Titti Kallio,et al.  Improving the Effectiveness of Mobile Application Design: User-Pairs Testing by Non-professionals , 2004, Mobile HCI.

[22]  Kent L. Norman,et al.  Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface , 1988, CHI '88.