Tuning domain size of block copolymers for directed self assembly using polymer blending: molecular dynamics simulation studies

A 10% batch-to-batch variation in molecular weight for a low polydispersity block copolymer (BCP) used for DSA lithography could result in more than a 6% change in critical dimension (CD). Therefore, there is a strong motivation and need to develop and understand methods for fine-tuning the domain size of DSA BCPs to meet the CD and pitch specifications that will be required for practical implementation of DSA processes. This study investigates two methods of fine-tuning the domain size of a specific batch of BCP through blending of the BCP with another polymer, either 1. a set of similar homopolymers (HPs) or 2. a similar BCP of different molecular weight. Each method was investigated and compared using a coarse grained molecular dynamics simulation. For BCP-HP blends, the domain size increases as the amount of HP increases because the HPs tend to slightly swell the BCP domains. A design heuristic was developed for guiding the determination of how much HP to add to obtain a desired pitch. For blends of different molecular weight BCPs, two different scaling regimes were identified; one regime is majority large chains and the other regime is majority small chains. Based on the simulation results, the domain scaling can be mapped across the full range of blends by simply measuring three points: the pure small chain domain size, the pure large chain domain size, and a 50/50 blend of the small and large chains. Comparing the two different blending methodologies, BCP blending with other BCPs is a more versatile approach because it can be used to either increase or decrease the domain size of a base BCP while HP blending can only increase the domain size. HP blending is also potentially problematic because the HPs tends to aggregate in the middle of each block’s half domain which can have a significant effect on CD uniformity due to the strong effect of local variations in the concentration of the HP and local variations in HP conformation. The use of BCP blends with other BCPs should be more favorable from a CD uniformity perspective because this approach is much less susceptible to initial local fluctuations than HP blends because all BCPs go to the A-B interface. The coarse grained molecular dynamics simulation is well suited for comparisons such as this and can produce design rules that are needed for experimental implementation of polymer blending with BCPs to tune domain size.

[1]  H. Kawai,et al.  Domain-Boundary Structure of Styrene-Isoprene Block Copolymer Films Cast from Solutions. 5. Molecular-Weight Dependence of Spherical Microdomains , 1980 .

[2]  L. Leibler Theory of Microphase Separation in Block Copolymers , 1980 .

[3]  A. Mayes,et al.  Equilibrium domain spacing in weakly segregated block copolymers , 1991 .

[4]  J. Vavasour,et al.  Self-consistent mean field theory of the microphases of diblock copolymers , 1992 .

[5]  K. Shull Mean-field theory of block copolymers: bulk melts, surfaces, and thin films , 1992 .

[6]  T. Hashimoto,et al.  Ordered structure in blends of block copolymers. 1. Miscibility criterion for lamellar block copolymers , 1993 .

[7]  A. Semenov PHASE-EQUILIBRIA IN BLOCK COPOLYMER HOMOPOLYMER MIXTURES , 1993 .

[8]  T. Hashimoto,et al.  Spatial distribution of homopolymers in block copolymer microdomains as observed by a combined SANS and SAXS method , 1994 .

[9]  T. Hashimoto,et al.  Ordered Structure in Blends of Block Copolymers.2.Self-Assembly for Immiscible Lamella-Forming Copolymers , 1994 .

[10]  F. Bates,et al.  Unifying Weak- and Strong-Segregation Block Copolymer Theories , 1996 .

[11]  Atsushi Noro,et al.  Effect of Composition Distribution on Microphase-Separated Structure from Diblock Copolymers , 2003 .

[12]  H. Yoshida,et al.  Nano-scale structure change of amphiphilic di-block copolymer by blend , 2006 .

[13]  G. Fredrickson,et al.  Microdomain Ordering in Laterally Confined Block Copolymer Thin Films , 2007 .

[14]  Joshua A. Anderson,et al.  General purpose molecular dynamics simulations fully implemented on graphics processing units , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[15]  J. Holoubek,et al.  Self‐assembled structures in blends of disordered and lamellar block copolymers: SAXS, SANS and TEM study , 2009 .

[16]  Marcus Müller,et al.  Theoretically informed coarse grain simulations of polymeric systems. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[17]  E. Kramer,et al.  SCFT Simulations of Thin Film Blends of Block Copolymer and Homopolymer Laterally Confined in a Square Well , 2009 .

[18]  Juan J. de Pablo,et al.  Interpolation in the Directed Assembly of Block Copolymers on Nanopatterned Substrates: Simulation and Experiments , 2010 .

[19]  Marcus Müller,et al.  Simulations of theoretically informed coarse grain models of polymeric systems. , 2010, Faraday discussions.

[20]  William D. Hinsberg,et al.  Self-assembly patterning for sub-15nm half-pitch: a transition from lab to fab , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[21]  Jillian M. Buriak,et al.  Rapid Assembly of Nanolines with Precisely Controlled Spacing from Binary Blends of Block Copolymers , 2011 .

[22]  J. D. de Pablo,et al.  Monte-Carlo simulation of ternary blends of block copolymers and homopolymers. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[23]  Clifford L. Henderson,et al.  Development of realistic potentials for the simulation of directed self-assembly of PS-PMMA di-block copolymers , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[24]  Ofir Montal,et al.  Directed self-assembly defectivity assessment. Part II , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[25]  Mark Somervell,et al.  Pattern scaling with directed self assembly through lithography and etch process integration , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[26]  Clifford L. Henderson,et al.  Detailed mesoscale dynamic simulation of block copolymer directed self-assembly processes: application of protracted colored noise dynamics , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[27]  Kris T. Delaney,et al.  Self-consistent field theory of directed self-assembly in laterally confined lamellae-forming diblock copolymers , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[28]  Peter Trefonas,et al.  Designing new materials and processes for directed self-assembly applications , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[29]  Hengpeng Wu,et al.  All track directed self-assembly of block copolymers: process flow and origin of defects , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[30]  Glenn H. Fredrickson,et al.  Directed self-assembly of laterally confined lamellae-forming diblock copolymers: polydispersity and substrate interaction effects , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[31]  Christophe Navarro,et al.  Pattern density multiplication by direct self assembly of block copolymers: toward 300mm CMOS requirements , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[32]  Clifford L. Henderson,et al.  Coarse grained molecular dynamics model of block copolymer directed self-assembly , 2013 .

[33]  Clifford L. Henderson,et al.  Effects of block copolymer polydispersity and χN on pattern line edge roughness and line width roughness from directed self-assembly of diblock copolymers , 2013, Advanced Lithography.